1. Where did your likes go? Please Read This Thread »

Do Republicans hate the constitution?

Discussion in 'The War Room' started by The Accuser, Feb 16, 2016.

  1. The Accuser Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2014
    Messages:
    2,607
    Likes Received:
    9
    Under the constitution the POTUS has the right and the duty to appoint justices to the SCOTUS. Nowhere in the constitution it says that this right ceases to exist in the last year of the presidency or when potential future candidates have started their race to become candidates in the next election.

    And it's not last week of December, Obama's term goes for almost another year, that's 25% of the term he has been elected for.

    Does it say in the constitution that certain rights or duties go only for 75% of the term? Do we want Obama to pull a Hendricks?

    Should Senators whose seat will be up for grabs come November not vote on Obama's nominee then?
     
  2. LucasWithLidOff Double Yellow Card Double Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2012
    Messages:
    10,858
    Likes Received:
    0
  3. second sight We have officially entered the "Age of Deception"

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2014
    Messages:
    11,025
    Likes Received:
    6
    New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, a powerful member of the Democratic leadership, said Friday the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush “except in extraordinary circumstances.”

    “We should reverse the presumption of confirmation,” Schumer told the American Constitution Society convention in Washington. “The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito.”



    Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2007/...ew-bush-high-court-picks-005146#ixzz40L4nLkZx

    the op is wrong, the president nominates, the senate confirms
     
  4. oldshadow Steel Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    29,222
    Likes Received:
    77
    Location:
    Virginia U.S.A.
    Missed this part?

     
  5. VulcanNervPinch Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2009
    Messages:
    15,331
    Likes Received:
    37
    :D

    Nicely done
     
  6. The Accuser Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2014
    Messages:
    2,607
    Likes Received:
    9
    Where does it say that he has to wait and abstain when he is in the last 25% of his term?
     
  7. OverCoronavirus Pressure Mayberry = War Room, WR = OT. Shit. Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2015
    Messages:
    63,002
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    5/7/89 Grateful Dead show, Frost amphitheatre
    As an independent who tries to be reasonable, I'll say that both the GOP and the DNC are cafeteria-style Constitutionalists.
     
  8. second sight We have officially entered the "Age of Deception"

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2014
    Messages:
    11,025
    Likes Received:
    6
    when Schumer suggested this in 2007, Bush had 17 months left
     
  9. oldshadow Steel Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    29,222
    Likes Received:
    77
    Location:
    Virginia U.S.A.
    Where does it say his political opponents must approve his nomination no matter how long he has left in his term?

    You know the same thing the democrats said they would do to Bush.

    I would say much depends on who he nominates and the statement he tries to make.
     
  10. machidafan99 Silver Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2014
    Messages:
    13,988
    Likes Received:
    2
    Checks & balances. The Dems & the Pres are getting checked.
     
  11. Edison Exotic Excellence of execution belt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    25,976
    Likes Received:
    452
    Republicans hate everything except the second amendment. And they especially hate Obama. For reasons.
     
  12. Dolomite Red Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    9,145
    Likes Received:
    0
    Politically, how is this any different than the Democrats who want to do away with the electoral college?
     
  13. The Accuser Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2014
    Messages:
    2,607
    Likes Received:
    9
    Well the electoral college allows for the candidate with less popular votes to win, which is contrary to democracy. The Senate is the place where the status of the states is protected.
     
  14. Jack V Savage Secretary of Keepin' It Real/Nicest Guy on Sherdog Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    73,230
    Likes Received:
    258
    It doesn't, but the notion that they will simply refuse to appoint anyone is clearly a problem if you believe in the checks and balances as laid out in the Constitution. As I pointed out to you earlier, there's a difference between saying that a particular candidate is not a good one and saying that you simply don't accept the president's right to fulfill his Constitutional obligations.

    Not really. One Democrat said that he felt fooled by Bush's nominations and that they should be especially careful going forward. The party as a whole didn't outright say that they wouldn't even give a hearing to anyone nominated by the president because there was some arbitrary amount of time left in his term.

    And anyway, you're not arguing against the idea that that this is improper; you're just inaccurately asserting that others have done the same thing. That's only a legitimate argument if you support what you falsely think that Democrats did.

    Of course it should depend on who he nominates. No one is saying that any choice should automatically be accepted. People just believe that the process should be carried out as the Constitution calls for.
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2016
  15. The Accuser Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2014
    Messages:
    2,607
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ofc they can vote his nominee down. But if it is because he should not nominate anybody in the first place it would speak of a disregard for the constitution. If it is beause he chooses an extremist it is justified. If they say they will block whoever, that's against the constitution imo.
     
  16. Fawlty Elizabeth Double Yellow Card Double Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2015
    Messages:
    41,341
    Likes Received:
    356
    Location:
    War Room Lounge
    I think the most stinging question to ask the right is this:

    What would Scalia have wanted? The answer is obvious.
     
  17. oldshadow Steel Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    29,222
    Likes Received:
    77
    Location:
    Virginia U.S.A.
    Because we live in a constitutional republic not a democracy.

    You know the whole civil rights thing.
     
  18. oldshadow Steel Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    29,222
    Likes Received:
    77
    Location:
    Virginia U.S.A.
    If he nominated a conservative they would vote that person in.

    But they know the chances of that are none.

    He still may nominate someone that can get enough support to be confirmed.
     
  19. kpt018 Gold Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    24,125
    Likes Received:
    1
    Unfortunately Dems do not show up to vote in off year elections and when we have a Rep controlled house this is what we get.
     
  20. The Accuser Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2014
    Messages:
    2,607
    Likes Received:
    9
    You are right but electoral college has nothing to do with civil rights or a republic. It's a (slight) diminishment of democracy with no added bonus to civil rights, rule of law or any other principle relating to our freedom.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.