Opinion Did Charlie Kirk have extremist thoughts and opinions?

[fingercuffs]

In this case: "It was definitely your Dad's fault".

Pretty ridiculous know-nothing take, TBH.

But I doubt we're in any danger of anyone misinterpreting his take as intelligent, so while it's clearly gonna be incendiary for you, I'm in favour of dropping the dork's talking points at this stage. Nothing worthwhile can come from such silliness. It's probably not even genuine.

He isn't with us anymore but when Daps wasn't away from his phone for 5 seconds in the Plats section a poster called him insufferably immature.
I would have hoped fatherhood might have made him grow up, not regress to laughing about rape.

 

[avenue94]

I read that he called him corrupt and said he should be in prison and face the death penalty for his crimes against America.

I don’t agree with that at all.. but that is not him saying that Biden should be publicly executed ???

Is there another clip somewhere I haven’t seen?

The death penalty for dubious corruption charges is a tad extreme. That shit rarely, if happens, even happens in your Singapores.

 

[Da Speeit]

"I don't care what you think"
"I don't care what you think"
"I don't care what you think"

But... thank you ultimately for caring what I think, I feel validated or whatever reaction you expected.

mocking a married man trying to console a woman having a meltdown on a Karate forum doesn’t really constitute as caring, but whatever you need to cope with brotha

 

[Da Speeit]

He isn't with us anymore but when Daps wasn't away from his phone for 5 seconds in the Plats section a poster called him insufferably immature.
I would have hoped fatherhood might have made him grow up, not regress to laughing about rape.

Unbelievable this is your take all while trying ti lecture people about morality.

I am immature tho. Would never trade my life for yours. Hope it works out for you though.

 

[fingercuffs]

@Siver! he's been doing this needy shit stirring thing for years. Literally I can remember him crying about losing a ton of posts when a thread was deleted in the plats...probably in 2010?

 

[Andy Capp]

You didn't address my argument. My argument is about paradigms. I'm specifically asking about epistemic justification. His foundation is still Prot/classical liberal. Switching up rhetoric or alliances don’t change the paradigm he’s operating from. He's still milktoast.

Y'all must be deliberately trying to trigger me with this repeated misspelling of milquetoast, like 20 times in the last few pages of this thread. Give it a rest already.

With zero evidence he wanted Joe Biden tossed in a hole and then executed in public. That's not extreme to you?

@joy2day I look forward to your explanation as to how that was taken out of context.

 

[Gutter Chris]

I would say advocating for the ending of the separation of church and state being an extremist view in American. That is a foundational tenet of our country.

By that line of logic do you also agree that anyone wanting to impose gun control is also an extremist or is that different and things change when it comes to that foundational tenet of our country ? Maybe you don't believe in that part so much so it's whatever?

It's also American to want to use the democratic process to ammend the constitution in the quest for a more perfect union and everyone gets a say in what that means.

 

[fingercuffs]

Unbelievable this is your take all while trying ti lecture people about morality.

I am immature tho. Would never trade my life for yours. Hope it works out for you though.

You literally laughed about it and blamed me for it.
Morality?

 

[USA!USA!]

The death penalty for dubious corruption charges is a tad extreme. That shit rarely, if happens, even happens in your Singapores.

Sure that is a good point. I’d agree with that.

All I was pointing out was saying that is a lot different than calling for a public execution.

 

[Source]

By that line of logic do you also agree that anyone wanting to impose gun control is also an extremist or is that different and things change when it comes to that foundational tenet of our country ? Maybe you don't believe in that part so much so it's whatever?

It's also American to want to use the democratic process to ammend the constitution in the quest for a more perfect union and everyone gets a say in what that means.

Do you not consider people that say they want the 2A abolished to be extremist? I certainly do. I think any changes to the bill of rights would be an extremist point of view. That didn’t work the way you thought it would did it?

 

[Da Speeit]

You literally laughed about it and blamed me for it.
Morality?

That’s literally not what happened

 

[Andy Capp]

Let's take a step back man. You're misunderstanding both the intentions and content of my post by making drastic assumptions.

First, I dont know nor do I care about planned parenthood as an organization. So, no, they have not "compromised" me as I have not interacted with them in any capacity. Second, I was speaking on abortions in general. Not just elective. Abortion law tends to be sweeping so I covered the whole gambit. Third, ALL rape based pregnancies are what I referred to. Not just kids. And all should receive the option to terminate.

Stand by for cases. Will edit shortly.

He's a snotty nosed troll. Of course, he's making drastic assumptions.

 

[Andy Capp]

I read that he called him corrupt and said he should be in prison and face the death penalty for his crimes against America.

I don’t agree with that at all.. but that is not him saying that Biden should be publicly executed ???

Is there another clip somewhere I haven’t seen?

"The clip was taken from Charlie Kirk’s talk radio show, The Charlie Kirk Show, where he can be seen saying, “Joe Biden is a bumbling, dementia filled, alzheimer's, corrupt tyrant who should honestly be put in prison and or given the death penalty for his crimes against America.”"

--

"This isn’t the first time the late conservative influencer had expressed a passion for capital punishment. In another clip, he can be seen advocating for public executions and for children to be allowed to watch them.

"Death penalties should be public, should be quick, it should be televised. I think at a certain age, its an initiation...What age should you start to see public executions?" Kirk asked, adding, “At what age should you start to see public executions?”

Another man replies eagerly, “16.”

“I think you could do it earlier, like maybe age 12. Sixth grade or so,” replies Blake Neff."

Charlie Kirk called for Joe Biden to be executed in resurfaced video

Amid a whirlwind of online reactions, a recently shared clip on X appears to show Charlie Kirk calling for former President Joe Biden to be executed

www.themirror.com

 

[Gutter Chris]

Do you not consider people that say they want the 2A abolished to be extremist? I certainly do. I think any changes to the bill of rights would be an extremist point of view. That didn’t work the way you thought it would did it?

I didn't have a plan for how it would go I was just curious if your logic was consistent in regards to the bill of rights really.

No one's trying to dunk on you hoss I'm just curious about people's convictions when they say things some times. I think folks call it a conversation

It's not an extremist belief because I think in order for something to be extreme it can't be a wildly held common belief and sadly that is. However I think it is extremely misguided and that it does not jive with our constitution . It does seem extreme to me because it clashes so greatly with my own ideas about what should and shouldn't be.


However that other thing I said about ammendments is also a part of our system and people get a say on if it's something that they want or not in our way of life regardless how foolish and misguided I think they might be. If enough people want something regardless of what it is , that is the will of the people and it will be done. It's difficult to do so we don't do it on a whim when we are in our feelings but there is a path for anything and everything to be considered constitutional if the people really want it

 

[avenue94]

Sure that is a good point. I’d agree with that.

All I was pointing out was saying that is a lot different than calling for a public execution.

I think the jump from status quo to calling for the death penalty over supposed cooperation is bigger than the jump from the latter to public executions.

Frankly, there isn't that much of a difference between public and private executions in my book. We're just talking the veneer of respectability and public values at that point.

 

[fingercuffs]

That’s literally not what happened

Who was to blame in your head? You keep fannying about it.

 

[Da Speeit]

Who was to blame in your head? You keep fannying about it.

Quote the post
Quote the post
Quote the post

 

[Khaosan]

Yes.

 

[Source]

I didn't have a plan for how it would go I was just curious if your logic was consistent in regards to the bill of rights really.

No one's trying to dunk on you hoss I'm just curious about people's convictions when they say things some times. I think folks call it a conversation

It's not an extremist belief because I think in order for something to be extreme it can't be a wildly held common belief and sadly that is. However I think it is extremely misguided and that it does not jive with our constitution . It does seem extreme to me because it clashes so greatly with my own ideas about what should and shouldn't be.


However that other thing I said about ammendments is also a part of our system and people get a say on if it's something that they want or not in our way of life regardless how foolish and misguided I think they might be. If enough people want something regardless of what it is , that is the will of the people and it will be done. It's difficult to do so we don't do it on a whim when we are in our feelings but there is a path for anything and everything to be considered constitutional if the people really want it

Would you be fine with the tyranny of the majority eliminating the freedom of religion clause in the 1st Amendment? If that’s what the majority wanted. Just because it may be something the majority wants doesn’t mean it can’t be extremist.

 

[fingercuffs]

Quote the post
Quote the post
Quote the post

Which post?
Fuck me "supremely annoying" as you were called decades ago when you were a child strikes again.