Opinion Bryce Mitchell turns.

"He sucks and who cares since he doesn't agree with who I support. Stick to sports"
 
Conspiracy theorists can never be appeased. Their reasoning changes frequently. With Trump being president for the second time. Its shocking theyve in large part have stayed loyal to him over these ~10 years.
Not that surprising. Trump is wildly inconsistent so it meshes with their wildly shifting beliefs
 
Not that surprising. Trump is wildly inconsistent so it meshes with their wildly shifting beliefs

Dont believe its that. Back in late 2015(?) when he announced his run for the republican nomination. First interview he did and endorsements he got was from Alex Jones. Who since then Trump has kept loyal by including him at some capacity.

In Trumps first campaign and term he was persistently stealing talking points directly from the Infowars show.
 
Can't wait to hear Bryce's take on wealth distribution and foreign policy.
 
Funny how Bryce says "he's sending our tax dollars to Israel and Ukraine" but doesn't mention Argentina...

<36>

Even as he hops on to the old bandwagons, he fails to recognize the current one.

Do they have internet wherever he's from?


Probably not. I would say he's a luddite but he does seem to love mouthing off on the Internet so fuck knows. I suppose it serves his purpose to devour flat earth podcasts he wouldn't otherwise have access to. He seems thick as fucking shit.
 
To add. His BJJ is good. But as a human being, Bryce has always struck me as a man who bites his own toenails after a hard day's graft dragging a plow in his field and then drinking moonshine while educating a few hogs on the deep Web.by educating I mean burping and farting, biting tiny bits of meat off a thigh bone and removing his checked shirt to sleep nude on hay in a horse stable. Rinse and repeat
 
It's funny how the crazier a right wing type gets, the more likely they are to view Trump as the POS he actually is.

I guess they go out the other end of the Overton window, whereas way, way, way too many people are sat happily inside it not really caring whether their leader is a corrupt megalomaniacal fucktard or not.
People don't care about him being a megalomaniacal fucktard, people care about him not being a nationalist.
The difference between right and left is right loves their families first and left loves outsiders first.
The left doesn't criticize Israel because they corrupt American politicians and funnel money out, they criticize Israel for their evil against Palestinians. The right criticizes Israel for both with focus on their corruption of USA.
 
I've never heard of him I've been out of the MMA loop for so long. I know Charlie Kirk, Nick Fuentes who were staunchly behind him turned on him with the Epstein files as well obviously.

/waits for the he's a can, Charlie was a can, and who's Fuentes onslaught.
q4PGZW.gif
 
People don't care about him being a megalomaniacal fucktard, people care about him not being a nationalist.
The difference between right and left is right loves their families first and left loves outsiders first.
The left doesn't criticize Israel because they corrupt American politicians and funnel money out, they criticize Israel for their evil against Palestinians. The right criticizes Israel for both with focus on their corruption of USA.

Yeah, although I wouldn't say it went down to family level. I think everyone loves their family.

But the left are more keenly attuned to injustice even if it doesn't directly affect them.

The right tune that shit the fuck out and rarely care about anyone else's suffering. I'd even say they're not really attuned to their own suffering/issues as they're less likely to seek therapy and mental health care or blame the correct people for their day-to-day problems such as not being paid enough by rich assholes. They might spend all day telling themselves to STFU, in which case I can understand why they have to say the same to everyone else.
 
Yeah, although I wouldn't say it went down to family level. I think everyone loves their family.

But the left are more keenly attuned to injustice even if it doesn't directly affect them.

The right tune that shit the fuck out and rarely care about anyone else's suffering. I'd even say they're not really attuned to their own suffering/issues as they're less likely to seek therapy and mental health care or blame the correct people for their day-to-day problems such as not being paid enough by rich assholes. They might spend all day telling themselves to STFU, in which case I can understand why they have to say the same to everyone else.
I see your point but science shows that it's lopsided. People with left leaning views more frequently come from broken homes, more frequently suffer from mental disorders and more often display narcissistic traits. They certainly use therapy more often as a result of above factors.

That data suggests, that their "activism" is performative, but regardless the outcome and the differentiation is at that level. Right prefers the ingroup, left prefers the outgroup. Which is unique across any other ethnicity/political leaning combination.
 
To add. His BJJ is good. But as a human being, Bryce has always struck me as a man who bites his own toenails after a hard day's graft dragging a plow in his field and then drinking moonshine while educating a few hogs on the deep Web.by educating I mean burping and farting, biting tiny bits of meat off a thigh bone and removing his checked shirt to sleep nude on hay in a horse stable. Rinse and repeat

That's one of the nicest things I have read about ol Bryce.
 
I see your point but science shows that it's lopsided. People with left leaning views more frequently come from broken homes, more frequently suffer from mental disorders and more often display narcissistic traits. They certainly use therapy more often as a result of above factors.

That data suggests, that their "activism" is performative

I'd be interested to see the 'science' of this, in terms of which studies, by whom, and what they actually said rather than how you have chosen to extrapolate and synopsise. In any case, I think that to go from People with left leaning views more frequently come from broken homes, more frequently suffer from mental disorders and more often display narcissistic traits, to That data suggests, that their "activism" is performative is something of a stretch and possibly more your interpretation of the data.

Just as one EG: if deh leftists come from broken homes, that would generally tend to suggest they will come from lower rather than higher socioeconomic strata, simply because broken homes in general have poorer economic outcomes. Classical 'leftist' themes of 'fighting for the oppressed (I'm deliberately simplifying) are pretty easy positions to come around to if you have started from a non-privileged position yourself. Or, at least, they are if you have empathy, and herein lies the crux I suspect.

The dismissal of 'leftist activism' as 'performative' just strikes me as the typical reductive characterisation that 'Deh Right' does, seemingly unable or unwilling to believe that empathy is a quality that is available to their political opponents (i have no idea of your political stance, I'm just speaking in general terms). We condemn the other side as 'virtue-signalling' when they show passion for the problems of others, but when we do it, why, that is deeply-felt, and deeply sincere, and issues from a vast well of empathy deep in my soul.

Anyways, I don't think anything in what you said really points to the activism of deh left as performative. i mean, whatever report/s were or weren't behind the 'science' here, I'll wager the conclusion of them really wasn't 'so we can see here that Deh Left's attitude of empathy for others and the most oppressed is empty and performative'
 
Last edited:
I'd be interested to see the 'science' of this, in terms of which studies, by whom, and what they actually said rather than how you have chosen to extrapolate and synopsise. In any case, I think that to go from People with left leaning views more frequently come from broken homes, more frequently suffer from mental disorders and more often display narcissistic traits, to That data suggests, that their "activism" is performative is something of a stretch and possibly more your interpretation of the data.

Just as one EG: if deh leftists come from broken homes, that would generally tend to suggest they will come from lower rather than higher socioeconomic strata, simply because broken homes in general have poorer economic outcomes. Classical 'leftist' themes of 'fighting for the oppressed (I'm deliberately simplifying) are pretty easy positions to come around to if you have started from a non-privileged position yourself. Or, at least, they are if you have empathy, and herein lies the crux I suspect.

The dismissal of 'leftist activism' as 'performative' just strikes me as the typical reductive characterisation that 'Deh Right' does, seemingly unable or unwilling to believe that empathy is a quality that is available to their political opponents (i have no idea of your political stance, I'm just speaking in general terms). We condemn the other side as 'virtue-signalling' when they show passion for the problems of others, but when we do it, why, that is deeply-felt, and deeply sincere, and issues from a vast well of empathy deep in my soul.

Anyways, I don't think anything in what you said really points to the activism of deh left as performative. i mean, whatever report/s were or weren't behind the 'science' here, I'll wager the conclusion of them really wasn't 'so we can see here that Deh Left's attitude of empathy for others and the most oppressed is empty and performative'
You drafted a very robust response to the opinion part of my post, not so much the data and context in which I provided it.

Virtue signalling is a symptom of narcissism and social disassociation, hence my opinion. Marching and organising protests by definition is performative. These same people could house and pay for the needy.

We are way off topic by the way.
 
Hopefully once the midterm elections are done Trump just comes clean about the Epstein stuff. It would mean a lot to the American people. There are tons of abryce Mitchell types who would otherwise love him but now don't because of this.
 
Back
Top