News *** Conor McGregor Found Civilly Liable for 2018 Sexual Assault MEGA THREAD ***

[dogsdonutsdragons]

You are talking out of your ass. The doctors and reporters that saw the pictures of her injuries said this were beyond what they had seen. There is a difference between rough sex and battery. She had a tampon encrusted into her vagina that had to be surgically removed. Conor denied that any of those injuries came from his intercourse with her.

You have clearly not read or heard the briefing of the case.

i did and i honestly do not buy it. they were both fucked up having rough sex.

 

[MarioLemieux]

i did and i honestly do not buy it. they were both fucked up having rough sex.

girl: please beat the shit out of me and have sex with me while my tampon is still in, said no girl ever. Sounds like you have no experience with the fairer sex.

Lest we not forget both of Conor's two victims were attacked in the middle of the night by arsonists or men in masks before the trials to stop them out of fear.

 

[dogsdonutsdragons]

girl: please beat the shit out of me and have sex with me while my tampon is still in, said no girl ever. Sounds like have no experience with the fairer sex.

Lest we not forget both of Conor's two victims were attacked in the middle of the night by arsonists or men in masks before the trials to stop them out of fear.

ive had sex with plenty of drunk ass women . consented sex. both drunk. they forgot they had a tampon in. has happened. some people are like this. i dont understand it but i also dont use tampons or get periods.


i could see conor being directly tied to people who would try a mob style scare off. for sure. i could also seeing him do this if he was innocent to avoid the public and potential risk of being proven guilty when hes innocent. i also think someone not connected to conor at all could do that. who knows. all speculation. even the what the "doctors" and "reporters" said. you havent lived much or you live a very privileged life if you truly believe everything you hear from people in professional positions .

 

[krelianx]

i did and i honestly do not buy it. they were both fucked up having rough sex.

Do you understand that the doctors, the experts that testified to the occurrence, when interrogated about these injuries being possibly the result of consensual sex said they had never seen bruising like that. The tampon wasn't just in, it tore into her vagina while she was menstruating. You are being not only extremely presumptuous, but conflating things in a way that shows incredible arrogance. This was a case overseen by legal experts, doctors, reporters, and a jury. You haven't even seen the photos, yet choose to question the opinion of every single expert that commented on them, and of the jury. Not to mention, the victim's testimony.

Conor denied any of this was of his making. He did not say they had rough sex or sex during her period. He said they had athletic sex. Nobody in that court argued that the injuries incurred from possibly rough consensual sex.

You are not only calling the jury's verdict and Nikita Hand's testimony into question, but the doctors, experts, and even Conor's own testimony of what happened.

Conor's team did not bring in medical experts to contest the testimony of the doctors and experts called by Hand's team. Why do you think that is?

You are being deliberately obtuse, projecting on the basis of anecdotal speculation since "you've had experiences of rough sex that were consensual with girls on their period." But this is not about you or whatever you might have experienced: professionals who work on cases of assault professionally and see cases regularly said this was unlike what they had seen in hundreds of cases. Reporters and even Conor himself claimed to be shocked by what he saw in the photographic evidence.

You can choose to ignore what we know, what has been said, to concoct your own narrative on the basis of your own life experiences, but the facts are there:

She was injured badly, had to have a tampon surgically removed, had extended bruising all throughout her body, neck, arms, torso, wrists, and every expert that testified said this was abnormal degree of injury. Conor denies that any of these injuries occurred from him having intercourse with her, and not a single member of Conor's defense claims any of this resulted from consensual but rough sex.

So, I ask you again, what alternative explanation is there?

 

[Pockets18]

i did and i honestly do not buy it. they were both fucked up having rough sex.

That's because you delusional Conor fanboys are braindead and blindly defend your idol like your life depends on it, doesn't matter the situation.

 

[MarioLemieux]

ive had sex with plenty of drunk ass women . consented sex. both drunk. they forgot they had a tampon in. has happened. some people are like this. i dont understand it but i also dont use tampons or get periods.


i could see conor being directly tied to people who would try a mob style scare off. for sure. i could also seeing him do this if he was innocent to avoid the public and potential risk of being proven guilty when hes innocent. i also think someone not connected to conor at all could do that. who knows. all speculation. even the what the "doctors" and "reporters" said. you havent lived much or you live a very privileged life if you truly believe everything you hear from people in professional positions .

That's a bizarre claim. I'm laying next to my woman right now and asked her and she says the pain would be horrific (fucking with a tampon)... and no it's not a common thing for women to fuck with tampons on and have them removed with forcepts at a hospital after because they are lodged so deep. Actually this is the first time I've ever heard of such a scenario.

As far as the rest is concerned the doctors examined this girl and said she was in among the most beaten up physical and emotional state they had seen someone. Saying that they're lying is absurd.

And then the attacks on the women pre-trial to scare them off. Conor has mob ties that are actually able to pull things like this off and get away with it. Some demented fanboys would not be able to pull that off.

Sounds like you listen to too much Andrew Tate, while in the real world Conor is cancelled...and for good reason. Anyone with sound logic would reach the same verdict.

 

[TITS]

ive had sex with plenty of drunk ass women . consented sex. both drunk. they forgot they had a tampon in. has happened. some people are like this. i dont understand it but i also dont use tampons or get periods.

You don't say?

i could see conor being directly tied to people who would try a mob style scare off. for sure. i could also seeing him do this if he was innocent to avoid the public and potential risk of being proven guilty when hes innocent. i also think someone not connected to conor at all could do that. who knows. all speculation. even the what the "doctors" and "reporters" said. you havent lived much or you live a very privileged life if you truly believe everything you hear from people in professional positions .

You might have the worst case of aspergers I've ever seen.

 

[1King]

Such a liar that she risked being on the hook for a million if she had lost. Such a liar that a nurse testified that out of all the years at the trauma rape center that she had never seen someone so horrifically beat the hell up. Such a liar that the Dr, the therapist, and nurse all testified that they all agreed that she has been raped.

I trust the people that do that shit for a living. Conors DNA was inside her bloody vagina as well. Conors only defense on how she got beat up was that she had been partying for days, no one gets beat the fuck up from partying for days.

Nikita Hand was brutally raped, the fact that people are still disputing this is insane witj all the evidence. I guesd you could try and argue that you can’t prove it was Conor, but there literally isn’t any sort of way she wasn’t raped

 

[MarioLemieux]

View attachment 1074124

You don't say?



You might have the worst case of aspergers I've ever seen.

Yeah that's beyond a retarded/fake claim. In his delusional version of reality, women would be showing up at hospitals all the time because they have tampons lodged so deep up their cervix they need to be removed with forcepts lol Maybe this poster has .5 inch dick or something

 

[Graceland]

ive had sex with plenty of drunk ass women . consented sex. both drunk. they forgot they had a tampon in. has happened. some people are like this. i dont understand it but i also dont use tampons or get periods.


i could see conor being directly tied to people who would try a mob style scare off. for sure. i could also seeing him do this if he was innocent to avoid the public and potential risk of being proven guilty when hes innocent. i also think someone not connected to conor at all could do that. who knows. all speculation. even the what the "doctors" and "reporters" said. you havent lived much or you live a very privileged life if you truly believe everything you hear from people in professional positions .

Why do you refer to professional doctors and reporters as «doctors» and «reporters», as if we should all rather trust the anecdotes of a random moron on the interwebz?

 

[Ghostpepper]

You are talking out of your ass. The doctors and reporters that saw the pictures of her injuries said this were beyond what they had seen. There is a difference between rough sex and battery. She had a tampon encrusted into her vagina that had to be surgically removed. Conor denied that any of those injuries came from his intercourse with her.

You have clearly not read or heard the briefing of the case.

What evidence is there that Conor inflicted those injuries?

Nikita's friend Danielle was only a few feet away in thr adjoining room when Nikita answered Conor where having sex. When they came out of the room Danielle said said she didn't notice any signs of such injuries or that anything was wrong.

Nikita Hand then went on to grope and kiss James Lawrence in the elevator after she decided she wanted to go back to the hotel with him having been in a taxi on the way home with him.

 

[SuperAlly]

eh maybe im a terrible judge of character

Yes.

 

[krelianx]

What evidence is there that Conor inflicted those injuries?

Nikita's friend Danielle was only a few feet away in thr adjoining room when Nikita answered Conor where having sex. When they came out of the room Danielle said said she didn't notice any signs of such injuries or that anything was wrong.

Nikita Hand then went on to grope and kiss James Lawrence in the elevator after she decided she wanted to go back to the hotel with him having been in a taxi on the way home with him.

The evidence is that they had sex, only his DNA was on her. And there are conflicting reports, Danielle said she didn't hear anything strange.

What plausible alternative explanation is there, that anyone has given?

 

[Chaotic Progressor]

The evidence is that they had sex, only his DNA was on her. And there are conflicting reports, Danielle said she didn't hear anything strange.

What plausible alternative explanation is there, that anyone has given?

Facts.

There's no evidence she saw any other man, they are consistent with sexual injuries of rape aka wrist bruising / him holding her down against struggle... right after they had sex and ONLY his DNA is in her. And he threw James' name into the ring / under the bus when he himself saw the injuries. Like, 'oh fuck I can't deny that, I better throw another man's name in her for confusion/bame' because that's all he had. Obvious as fuck.

 

[Chaotic Progressor]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14127227/conor-mcgregor-link-kinahan-cartel-organised-crime.html

So Nikita Hand and the 40 year old who Conor pushed off his yaught were both attacked in what appeared to be organized attacks to scare them out of taking on the civil trials. With the 40 year old it worked and she was feared into dropping the charges.

That's literally what fkn gangsters do, like Italian mobsters of the fkn 50s. Dude is out of control.

 

[Snoowpy]

Do you understand that the doctors, the experts that testified to the occurrence, when interrogated about these injuries being possibly the result of consensual sex said they had never seen bruising like that. The tampon wasn't just in, it tore into her vagina while she was menstruating. You are being not only extremely presumptuous, but conflating things in a way that shows incredible arrogance. This was a case overseen by legal experts, doctors, reporters, and a jury. You haven't even seen the photos, yet choose to question the opinion of every single expert that commented on them, and of the jury. Not to mention, the victim's testimony.

Conor denied any of this was of his making. He did not say they had rough sex or sex during her period. He said they had athletic sex. Nobody in that court argued that the injuries incurred from possibly rough consensual sex.

You are not only calling the jury's verdict and Nikita Hand's testimony into question, but the doctors, experts, and even Conor's own testimony of what happened.

Conor's team did not bring in medical experts to contest the testimony of the doctors and experts called by Hand's team. Why do you think that is?

You are being deliberately obtuse, projecting on the basis of anecdotal speculation since "you've had experiences of rough sex that were consensual with girls on their period." But this is not about you or whatever you might have experienced: professionals who work on cases of assault professionally and see cases regularly said this was unlike what they had seen in hundreds of cases. Reporters and even Conor himself claimed to be shocked by what he saw in the photographic evidence.

You can choose to ignore what we know, what has been said, to concoct your own narrative on the basis of your own life experiences, but the facts are there:

She was injured badly, had to have a tampon surgically removed, had extended bruising all throughout her body, neck, arms, torso, wrists, and every expert that testified said this was abnormal degree of injury. Conor denies that any of these injuries occurred from him having intercourse with her, and not a single member of Conor's defense claims any of this resulted from consensual but rough sex.

So, I ask you again, what alternative explanation is there?

Now I'm not saying he did or didn't rape her. But this is what druggy whored absolutely do. You think they're measured after a couple of days of coke, pills and alcohol?

If he did do it, he's a retard. If he didn't do it he's also a retard. He shouldn't have been there using drugs like a junkie. That's what got him into problems. So far this woman left her man, left her kids, lied about it. Went to Conors hotel. Got supposedly raped. Hung out with him, kissed him. Hooked up with his friend. Got into a cab, went back to the hotel, had sex again.

Somewhere this tampon situation doesn't line up. Not saying he couldn't have done it. But if something is lodged in a cervix means a woman wouldnt be able to walk straight unless maybe on copious amounts of drugs. I'm not sure. The woman is a retard and so are the guys in this story. And no matter what happened this retard threw away what was left of his legacy.

 

[krelianx]

Now I'm not saying he did or didn't rape her. But this is what druggy whored absolutely do. You think they're measured after a couple of days of coke, pills and alcohol?

If he did do it, he's a retard. If he didn't do it he's also a retard. He shouldn't have been there using drugs like a junkie. That's what got him into problems. So far this woman left her man, left her kids, lied about it. Went to Conors hotel. Got supposedly raped. Hung out with him, kissed him. Hooked up with his friend. Got into a cab, went back to the hotel, had sex again.

Somewhere this tampon situation doesn't line up. Not saying he couldn't have done it. But if something is lodged in a cervix means a woman wouldnt be able to walk straight unless maybe on copious amounts of drugs. I'm not sure. The woman is a retard and so are the guys in this story. And no matter what happened this retard threw away what was left of his legacy.

The doctors testifying and experts spoke about the tampon and how it made her have difficulties moving and sitting. I think you are thinking of some drunk woman who gets into rough situations. This is not that. The doctors said the injuries Nikita sustained are not normal, and everyone who saw the photographic evidence claimed to be shocked, including Conor. I don't understand how many times I have to repeat this obvious fact: nobody, not a single person in Conor's legal team or Conor claimed her injuries resulted from rough consensual sex. They claim these injuries were somehow sustained outside this event. How? You're saying "this is what "druggy whores" do. But nobody has claimed that what happened was that she consented to rough sex to that extent., In fact, Conor has categorically denied that the injuries happened from him, and denied that the sex was "rough". Yet we know it couldn't have been the boyfriend, because she sent the pictures and messaged her friend before returning home.

The texts and communication time stamps were delivered and correspond to the evidence shown in the doctor's medical record. And again, this was before she went back home. Only his DNA was there.

But here's the other thing. If Nikita Hand was so drunk she could not even have the amount of consciousness to feel the pain of having a tampon torn into her vagina and getting battered up, then it was rape, full stop. Yet people here are saying majestically idiotic things like "well I've had rough sex with girls that wanted it rough".

This is the world we are living in. I'd grant Conor the benefit of doubt if there was a convincing alternative explanation. But there isn't.

 

[Ares Black]

So far this woman left her man, left her kids, lied about it. Went to Conors hotel. Got supposedly raped. Hung out with him, kissed him. Hooked up with his friend. Got into a cab, went back to the hotel, had sex again.

This is Conor McGregor's version of events. No wonder you are confused.

 

[Ares Black]

What evidence is there that Conor inflicted those injuries?

Nikita's friend Danielle was only a few feet away in thr adjoining room when Nikita answered Conor where having sex. When they came out of the room Danielle said said she didn't notice any signs of such injuries or that anything was wrong.

Nikita Hand then went on to grope and kiss James Lawrence in the elevator after she decided she wanted to go back to the hotel with him having been in a taxi on the way home with him.

If you're don't understand that her friend was paid to say that, you are unbelievably naive.

 

[DFresh1]

ive had sex with plenty of drunk ass women . consented sex. both drunk. they forgot they had a tampon in. has happened. some people are like this. i dont understand it but i also dont use tampons or get periods.


i could see conor being directly tied to people who would try a mob style scare off. for sure. i could also seeing him do this if he was innocent to avoid the public and potential risk of being proven guilty when hes innocent. i also think someone not connected to conor at all could do that. who knows. all speculation. even the what the "doctors" and "reporters" said. you havent lived much or you live a very privileged life if you truly believe everything you hear from people in professional positions .

You think an innocent man would use THE MOB to avoid public scrutiny? And that someone who doesn't give 2 shits about Conor would ' step in " to defend his honor FOR FREE?

You're just being stupid on purpose. It doesn't matter what you think. You're not on trial and the trial doesn't care what you think. Even if you were involved you would have been excused for you bias anyways.

Conors getting what's coming to him. But don't worry, hell he'll still be fine.