Law alien enemies act grants LEO permission to enter a home without a warrant.

Poor gangbangers

Half the people that they're claiming are gangbangers aren't.

...and Tren de Aragua was a Venezuelan prison gang that was crushed by that government years ago.

All the stuff about them having a presence in the US, rivaling the cartels and having influence over Maduro are just more fantastical lies from this clown administration.
 
Half the people that they're claiming are gangbangers aren't.

...and Tren de Aragua was a Venezuelan prison gang that was crushed by that government years ago.

All the stuff about them having a presence in the US, rivaling the cartels and having influence over Maduro are just more fantastical lies from this clown administration.
The idea that Trump, in obvious bad faith, would invoke a 1798 law that was already famous for allowing Japanese internment camps and claim that a Venezuelan street gang meets the legal threshold of an "invasion" by a foreign nation or government is just absurd. And the fact that these idiots are all seal-clapping in favor of it just shows how bereft of critical thinking and morally bankrupt they are.

This law and the Alien and Sedition Acts are often used as the textbook examples of government overreach and abuse of power during times of crisis and are generally regarded as being a black mark on early American history.

But it's okay to suspend basic human rights for a manufactured crisis because immigrants bad and the Supreme Court might just rubber stamp some obvious bullshit by hiding behind procedural excuses. Kind of shows you what the supposed Tea Party folks think about the actual Constitution though.
 
You're an idiot.

TS (my Sherbro Doctor Taco) got it wrong.

It's not the Alien Enemies Act that grants permission to pursue a criminal into a house, it's United States v. Santana (1976). There is nothing wrong with the memo as far as that goes.
The word pursue is never used in the document itself:

 
As a general rule I do not believe law enforcement should enter homes without a warrant. The only exception being exigent circumstances to save a life. Kicking in the door for an illegal should not qualify.

This becomes a slippery slope far too quickly.

If you have a suspected illegal in a home you wait for a warrant, wait for an opportunity outside the home or skip it altogether.

I acknowledge previous SCOTUS rulings, case law, and current ICE procedure. I am stating my opinion.
 
The word pursue is never used in the document itself:

Here is what happened. Memo was released and @Whippy McGee decided he needed to see what CatTurd, Baldy Tim Pool on any other corporate confirmation bias source he uses to spin this. Those sources gave him the pursuit Supreme Court case to throw him off the scent when the words pursue was never in the memo.
This is how MAGA influencers work. One comes up with a good spin and all of them repeat it in a unified voice, then the Cult Members spread it on other social media sites. One thing I will give MAGA is their ability to dupe their followers with half truths.
 
It is truly amazing how clueless so many people around here are about what probable cause is and is not. No wonder Trump enjoys such easy acceptance from his supporters when he shits on the constitution over and over.
 
Last edited:
how come nobody called out the government for being tyrannical for flooding your country with illegals so they could suppress your wages, dilute the vote, increase the cost of living and make you feel unsafe in your own streets as unpunished violent crime skyrockets ?
 
how come nobody called out the government for being tyrannical for flooding your country with illegals so they could suppress your wages, dilute the vote, increase the cost of living and make you feel unsafe in your own streets as unpunished violent crime skyrockets ?
Whataboutism. Please address the topic at hand before bringing up your grievances. Or maybe start a thread about it and discuss it there.
 
Whataboutism. Please address the topic at hand before bringing up your grievances. Or maybe start a thread about it and discuss it there.
I am addressing the topic at hand by pointing out the stupidity and inconsistency of topic premise
 
how come nobody called out the government for being tyrannical for flooding your country with illegals so they could suppress your wages, dilute the vote, increase the cost of living and make you feel unsafe in your own streets as unpunished violent crime skyrockets ?

Funny how illegals both dilute the vote and at the same time makes Democrats lose elections.

Also illegals can't vote, but as i said in another thread, MAGA doesn't considers Latinos as "real citizen" so no wonder they have this idea.
 
Memo says nothing about pursuit, that was just a stupid ass argument of @Whippy McGee who didn't even read the memo and thought that usatoday:COM was somehow an official government channel or something.
This is what AI says about your claim


The DOJ memo issued by Attorney General Pam Bondi on March 14, 2025, which outlines the pursuit of suspected Tren de Aragua members, is a document hosted on DocumentCloud at the link you provided: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25915967-doj-march-14-memo-alien-enemies-act/#document/p1. However, both the USA TODAY article and the DocumentCloud link indicate that the full text of the memo is not publicly accessible in a paginated format for direct viewing in the search results or linked sources. Instead, the USA TODAY article summarizes key excerpts, and the DocumentCloud link points to a document that requires access to view the full content.
Identifying the Page for “Pursuit”
Since I cannot directly access the full memo on DocumentCloud, I’ll rely on the USA TODAY article’s detailed summary to infer where the pursuit-related directives are likely located:
• Key Excerpt on Pursuit: The article states, “It purports to grant authority for police to enter a suspected ‘Alien Enemy’s residence’ if ‘circumstances render it impracticable’ to first obtain a warrant.” This is one of the primary sections addressing pursuit, as it authorizes law enforcement to enter homes without a warrant to apprehend suspects.
• Additional Pursuit Directive: The article also mentions, “Due to a ‘dynamic nature of law enforcement procedures’ officers are free to ‘apprehend aliens’ based on their ‘reasonable belief’ they meet the definitions, the memo states.” This further elaborates on the conditions under which pursuit can occur, relying on officers’ discretion.
Likely Page Location
The DocumentCloud link indicates the document starts at page 1 (#document/p1), and the memo is described as a relatively concise directive (not a lengthy report), likely spanning a few pages. Based on standard memo structure:
• Page 1: Typically includes introductory information, such as the memo’s purpose, date, and issuer (Attorney General Pam Bondi, March 14, 2025). It might also state the legal basis (Alien Enemies Act) for the directives.
• Page 2 or 3: Operational details, such as the pursuit directives, are usually provided after the introduction. The specific language about entering homes without a warrant (“if ‘circumstances render it impracticable’ to first obtain a warrant”) and apprehending based on “reasonable belief” is likely on one of these early pages, as they are core to the memo’s guidance for law enforcement.
Given that the USA TODAY article highlights these pursuit directives as central to the memo, they are probably located on page 2 or page 3, following an introductory section. The memo also attaches an “Alien Enemy Validation Guide,” which might be an appendix or later section, so the pursuit directives would precede that.
Why Exact Page Numbers Are Unclear
• The full memo isn’t directly viewable in the search results or linked sources, so I can’t confirm the exact page numbers.
• The DocumentCloud link requires access to view the document’s content beyond the metadata (e.g., title and hosting details).
• The USA TODAY article summarizes the memo without citing specific page numbers, focusing instead on the content of the directives.
Conclusion
The parts of the DOJ memo that discuss pursuit—specifically the authorization to enter a suspected “Alien Enemy’s residence” without a warrant if “circumstances render it impracticable” and the allowance to apprehend based on “reasonable belief”—are likely found on page 2 or page 3 of the document, following an introductory section. These directives are central to the memo’s guidance for law enforcement on deporting suspected Tren de Aragua members under the Alien Enemies Act. If you have access to the full memo via DocumentCloud, you can confirm the exact page by looking for these phrases in the early operational sections. If you’d like to explore other aspects of the memo, let me know!
 
Back
Top