Opinion AI peaking each day more and more

[lsa]

I'm surprised there isn't an MMA promotion that has decided to rely on AI matchmaking.

matchmaking? I am surprised there isn't an AI mma promotion.
You dont have to pay the fighters or deal with them.

 

[Why did you]

- This looks like real people!
Someday i will be able to do my stand alone ED209 movie!

 

[Why did you]

yes but all that content will be FREE ie maybe not actually free but it will not generate any money. if everyone makes videos for essentially free who would pay for an ai movie when you can use an ai to take the idea and recreate it for free as it cannot be copyrighted

there wont be ads because everything will be free. no ones gonna sit thru a 30 second ad if i can say 'recreate schemes video perfectly' (again totally legal, you cant copyright ai material) and it can do that in 20 seconds i wont watch your video ill watch my video copied from your video.

why go to a doctor and pay $10,000 when i can have a intelligent bot diagnose me for $0.12 and then have a robot surgery done perfectly for $80-500. why have health care. why have mathematicians. every industry will go under. money will become obsolete

i im affraid if the idea thats cooking high high above where the big decision makers are,
is to release as much people as possible, replace them with ai stuff / ai robots, and have the world for themselves

 

[Bubzeh]

It's game over. The smart folk need to start limiting their time on technology.

Wow I burst out laughing at the final few seconds of that clip.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

People that are enthusiastic about AI are absolute morons.

 

[Why did you]

People that are enthusiastic about AI are absolute morons.

 

[shockaholic12]

I work with Data Scientists and Technologists and we debate AI. There are two schools of thought.

(1) AI will improve exponentially and run away without us being able to control it.
(2) AI will improve quickly and plateau as the experience requirement for learning / communication limits the AI

I lean towards the second set, but I'm not completely sold. Currently, we are using generative AI to query the data for nuclear plants to understand if there are improvements we can make in their operations for better safety and operational efficiency. So far, it hasn't produced any big improvements, but it's early.

I don’t call these programs AI because they lack awareness so I don’t think they are intelligent.

But either way I don’t see how these programs would create novel ideas for plant safety. It can look at the ideas for plant safety people have already came up with and regurgitate them to you. It isn’t aware of the question you’re asking it or what anything means so it cannot create new ideas for plant safety people haven’t thought of yet.

That’s what I find so unimpressive about AI, it can’t think beyond the rules and parameters humans have set for it. It can’t grasp what those terms even mean to understand thinking outside the box it’s in is possible. No new ideas are formed, just old ones rehashed.

 

[Croo67]

People that are enthusiastic about AI are absolute morons.

Desperate to appear ahead of the game and ‘progressive’.

The reality is that they actually just look like dinosaurs, as AI is nowhere near as advanced as it’s portrayed by the relentless propaganda (largely by those looking to harvest data and sell programmes) and the video is not a representation of where AI currently is.

No doubt AI will advance, but the constant pretending it’s the here and now is so tedious.

 

[Witchhunt]

There's a massive chasm between how much money has been spent and how much money has been made back by organic interest.

There's a reason most of Nvidia's messaging for Computex was directed at non-tech industries and getting them to think in terms they can understand (AI factories lol)

What do you think is the peak?

Porn

 

[Fox by the Sea]

Desperate to appear ahead of the game and ‘progressive’.

The reality is that they actually just look like dinosaurs, as AI is nowhere near as advanced as it’s portrayed by the relentless propaganda (largely by those looking to harvest data and sell programmes) and the video is not a representation of where AI currently is.

No doubt AI will advance, but the constant pretending it’s the here and now is so tedious.

a lot of it is just machine learning algos made to look like some advanced autonomous feature while it's definitely not and that sometimes is downright retarded, but it's being pushed by sociopaths that want to get a billion dollars of venture capital promising horseshit.

in the meantime, the entire internet is just flooded to the brim with idiotic prompts disguised as "art". in about 3 years the internet will be an awful place to be. already for about a year i noticed it creeping in this very forum, with users replies being basically "hey chatgpt, how to i answer this?". i'd ban them on sight. it's not like it's hard to find, they all sounds the same.

 

[SKYNET]

great job AI

 

[SKYNET]

Porn

That rabbit hole will extend beyond the entire known universe

 

[Croo67]

a lot of it is just machine learning algos made to look like some advanced autonomous feature while it's definitely not and that sometimes is downright retarded, but it's being pushed by sociopaths that want to get a billion dollars of venture capital promising horseshit.

in the meantime, the entire internet is just flooded to the brim with idiotic prompts disguised as "art". in about 3 years the internet will be an awful place to be. already for about a year i noticed it creeping in this very forum, with users replies being basically "hey chatgpt, how to i answer this?". i'd ban them on sight. it's not like it's hard to find, they all sounds the same.

There’s also users presenting ChatGPT as a decider in debates, in that no one can possibly argue with ChatGPT’s answer.

I actually spoke to a guy who works within AI who said it’s all incredibly bad for the climate. He said that the generation alone of meme images is using more electricity than many European countries do in a year. Odd as the climate nuts love AI.

 

[Fox by the Sea]

There’s also users presenting ChatGPT as a decider in debates, in that no one can possibly argue with ChatGPT’s answer.

which is insane. shartgpt says horseshit all the time, sometimes it downright invents references. it's worse than wikipedia.

Odd as the climate nuts love AI.

it's because it looks like tidy, clean offices and electricity. it doesn't look like dirty fingernails and rough hands. i don't understand why some lefties like AI. it's the most ultra-capitalist, anti worker phenomenon that has ever existed.

 

[shockaholic12]

It's just going to get too good to even detect, especially because AI can just train itself to beat it's own detection software. Think about the consequences of there being no more trust in any video, in terms of knowing the truth about anything going on in the world. The level of propaganda that can be done. The fact that you cannot determine whether a crime occurred or not. If AI can fool anything than we literally have lost our ability to record the truth.

I am looking forward to the democratization of media. When anyone can just generate movie content, music, games, etc. We will soon have an infinite amount of entertainment at our disposals that will only get better as time moves forward. We are not far from it today. I'd say in a decade years almost everything will be generated by AI and there will be very little distinction between it and reality. And anyone can do it. I look forward to the day where I can just write a story and show it off in a worthy media. I don't need hundreds of millions of dollars to do so, and that day is coming very near.

I think there will be a pretty big market for AI-specific content. I could see a new ecosystem around AI, review sites for AI movies, games, etc. Video sites specific for AI content where people upvote the best ones, like how old school Newgrounds used to tailor to Flash videos. Live-streams of non-stop AI generated music genres, an infinite stream of never ending new music. You could generate a sequel to any movie, or replace the lead character with someone else. The possibilities that are in our fingertips and really isn't far away is astonishing.

I think AI can save the US economy if done correctly. It can spark a lot of new natural demand for AI generated content to spark consumer spending. And the investment going into it is currently huge and almost carrying the market. Without the AI hype I really have no idea where we would be as an economy right now.

And the use cases are kind of infinite for AI. The use cases in healthcare to make it cheaper. The use cases in optimization and efficiencies is crazy. AI has already made progress in mathematics, improving coding algorithms, become better at diagnosing certain conditions, etc. And in terms of coding, I can say with experience it has already far surpassed humans in terms of breadth and like 8 in 10 developers in terms of depth from what I can see at a big tech company. It's simply a force multiplier like we have not seen before because this time it can really scale out of control and improve things at a rate we truly couldn't comprehend a decade ago.

So I really hope we don't demonize AI just because it's of it's scary negatives. It has a lot of benefits to society and the fact that so many people view it negatively could really hurt what is going on right now in terms of investment and research. Especially because it can objectively improve our lives in so many ways.

The media generated by these programs will continue to lower the quality of art. I hesitate to call what these programs produce art because the program cannot grasp the meaning of anything so it can’t interpret meaning into what it makes, no matter what instruction you give it.

The overall problem with these programs are they don’t create new thought. There’s no novel aspects of what it produces. They regurgitate what people have already created. It can only copy. It cannot create a new art style or new art form because its not intelligent and can’t grasp that’s possible. It cannot think or produce things outside the box even if you want it to. You are not creating a new film when to use these programs, you are copying other films and regurgitating them. Swimming around a stagnant pool of rehashed media is going to go old fast.

Not to mention how it continues to make folks lazier when it comes to doing our own writing, drawing, music making, etc which further limits our ability to appreciate and understand how others use it.

In reality it’s rare the best films came from situations where those creating it had no restraints on the budget/tools of production. Those films almost always feel soulless. It’s often the case the films where the filmmakers had to face constraints and production limits ended up producing the better art because they then had to think beyond what others had done before to express themselves.

How can something that can’t interpret meaning and can’t produce novel anything make art better?

 

[Why did you]

a lot of it is just machine learning algos made to look like some advanced autonomous feature while it's definitely not and that sometimes is downright retarded, but it's being pushed by sociopaths that want to get a billion dollars of venture capital promising horseshit.

in the meantime, the entire internet is just flooded to the brim with idiotic prompts disguised as "art". in about 3 years the internet will be an awful place to be. already for about a year i noticed it creeping in this very forum, with users replies being basically "hey chatgpt, how to i answer this?". i'd ban them on sight. it's not like it's hard to find, they all sounds the same.

Dear Fox

Thank you for your passionate critique of contemporary artificial intelligence systems. Your insights have been processed by AI neural networks (which are definitely not just glorified if statements) and assigned an 87.4% probability of containing human emotion—congratulations.

To address your concerns in a structured, corporate-approved manner:
Statistical analysis confirms that, yes, sometimes AI algorithms do indeed interpret "draw a horse" as "a dog with existential dread wearing a saddle." Progress!

AI predictive models suggest a 96.2% chance that the next pitch deck will include the phrase "blockchain-enabled AI art disruptor." Funding secured!

Proposed countermeasure for banning ChatGPT-like replies:: Mandatory CAPTCHAs asking users to identify which of these responses was written by a human. (Spoiler: Neither. Both are bots arguing.)
While current AI may indeed be "50% genius, 50% accidentally microwaving its own brain," we are rapidly approaching the Singularity—or at least, a future where 90% of forum replies are generated by bots arguing with other bots.

 

[Confucamus]

The only giveaway is the mouths when they are speaking, but that's only because I know to look for it. It's crazy how realistic this has gotten.

 

[chardog]

I don’t call these programs AI because they lack awareness so I don’t think they are intelligent.

But either way I don’t see how these programs would create novel ideas for plant safety. It can look at the ideas for plant safety people have already came up with and regurgitate them to you. It isn’t aware of the question you’re asking it or what anything means so it cannot create new ideas for plant safety people haven’t thought of yet.

That’s what I find so unimpressive about AI, it can’t think beyond the rules and parameters humans have set for it. It can’t grasp what those terms even mean to understand thinking outside the box it’s out in is possible. No new ideas are formed, just old ones rehashed.

"Creativity"

something that AI lacks

 

[LeonardoBjj]

- ED209 got so much untaped potential. He is the Karrion Kross of hollywood!

 

[LeonardoBjj]

matchmaking? I am surprised there isn't an AI mma promotion.
You dont have to pay the fighters or deal with them.

- So we had promotions like this here