2014 War Room Awards

15*
And that was in response to you saying that a 16 year old was a "child".

yeah..thats hardly an extreme position to hold, I think you would find that a majority of people would agree with me there :icon_neut
 
yeah..thats hardly an extreme position to hold, I think you would find that a majority of people would agree with me there :icon_neut

You really want to go down that road again?
The only reason you called the 16 year old a child was because it was sex between two men, with one of the men being a supporter of democratic party. Pretty easy to see your homophobic right-wing agenda shine through once again. Here's a nice quote from you:
he fucked a child in the arse...hardly the same as a woman teacher riding her (lucky) 15 year old student.

You're despicable.

If anyone is interested in reading the shit-thread:
http://forums.sherdog.com/forums/f5...-obama-supporter-arrested-child-rape-2871763/
 
You really want to go down that road again?
The only reason you called the 16 year old a child was because it was sex between two men, with one of the men being a supporter of democratic party. Pretty easy to see your homophobic right-wing agenda shine through once again. Here's a nice quote from you:


You're despicable.

If anyone is interested in reading the shit-thread:
http://forums.sherdog.com/forums/f5...-obama-supporter-arrested-child-rape-2871763/

that was clearly a tongue in cheek comment....but by all means, hold on to it for as long as you can and use it at every opportunity. :rolleyes:
 
that was clearly a tongue in cheek comment....but by all means, hold on to it for as long as you can and use it at every opportunity. :rolleyes:

Oh I see. I guess I just don't understand your sophisticated humor.
So please, make it clear to me, how do you feel about a 15 year old boy having sex with an adult female (for the hell of it, let's say that she is 35 years old)? Would you call it child rape?
 
Oh I see. I guess I just don't understand your sophisticated humor.
So please, make it clear to me, how do you feel about a 15 year old boy having sex with an adult female (for the hell of it, let's say that she is 35 years old)?

well I wouldn't be happy if it happened to my son, but I would be much more enraged if some man sodomized my son, especially a prolific :eek::eek::eek::eek: piece of shit like that guy. they are both bad, but not equal
 
Mr. Fascists: I can remember his name, the guy arguing for pages (mostly with Dochtor) about black genes and their natural tendency for violence. He was knowledgeable but pretty scary.

Coldfront, I think. He's not all that different from Zank on that issue (probably regurgitation of "HBD" junk science from both of them).

Best Poster of the Year: JVS (except when he is accusing hard lefties who don't like all sharpton of being mainstream lol)

"Mainstream" might not be le mot juste, but there's a divide between blue-collar liberals like me and white-collar leftists like Ultra (in terms of our upbringing rather than where we currently are) that is reflected in our respective attitudes toward Sharpton (and, of course, there's also a divide among blue-collar liberals that would lead to a split there).
 
well I wouldn't be happy if it happened to my son, but I would be much more enraged if some man sodomized my son, especially a prolific :eek::eek::eek::eek: piece of shit like that guy. they are both bad, but not equal

19e48jge57ty5png.png


At least you have admitted that you would be more enraged if it was gay sex, rather than straight sex. So far so good.

Let's try again:
You're coming home one evening. you hear noises from your sons room. Kate Beckinsale (at 41 years old) is riding your 15 year old son.
9acef0404a6527f39ed2cabd16bc89a9_88020.JPEG


This is where you call the police and scream child rape?
 
I'm not going to jump through the hoops you present me with. PM me and stop trying to derail the thread. you wont get me with a "gotcha" like im somehow scared of being labelled a "homophobe", you have already called me a racist, xenophobe, homophobe, islamaphobe and probably some other things too. in your mind, a man bumming a teen boy is the same as two adults getting together, and for that I can never see eye to eye with you.
 
I'm not going to jump through the hoops you present me with. PM me and stop trying to derail the thread. you wont get me with a "gotcha" like im somehow scared of being labelled a "homophobe", you have already called me a racist, xenophobe, homophobe, islamaphobe and probably some other things too. in your mind, a man bumming a teen boy is the same as two adults getting together, and for that I can never see eye to eye with you.

Erhhhh. Are there any of those labels that doesn't fit with you? Do you even read your own posts and threads?
If it's not some Eurabia nonsense where you call all muslims for :eek::eek::eek::eek:'s (to be fair you like to call people :eek::eek::eek::eek:'s a lot), then it's about how disgusting homosexuals are.
So how exactly are you not any of that?

PS:
gotcha.
 
Coldfront, I think. He's not all that different from Zank on that issue (probably regurgitation of "HBD" junk science from both of them).



"Mainstream" might not be le mot juste, but there's a divide between blue-collar liberals like me and white-collar leftists like Ultra (in terms of our upbringing rather than where we currently are) that is reflected in our respective attitudes toward Sharpton (and, of course, there's also a divide among blue-collar liberals that would lead to a split there).

Zank has a social point of view, ie multiculturalism goes against support for socialism. I don't think he ever waded into the genetic arguments like cold front did.

And I was mostly complimenting you there (said you were best poster of the year), no need to thank me by repeating the coo coo.
 
Erhhhh. Are there any of those labels that doesn't fit with you? Do you even read your own posts and threads?
If it's not some Eurabia nonsense where you call all muslims for :eek::eek::eek::eek:'s (to be fair you like to call people :eek::eek::eek::eek:'s a lot), then it's about how disgusting homosexuals are.
So how exactly are you not any of that?

PS:
gotcha.

Another thing I have always hated about you is your ability to blatantly lie...I have never said that "all muslims are :eek::eek::eek::eek:'s", what a dumb thing to say. and attacking people who see islam as a threat to their way of life is a shitty thing to do...so fucking what if I find elements of radical islam as being basically evil..you do know what islam is, don't you?, you are aware of history..and even current events involving that death cult?, how the fuck can you be so obnoxious?
 
Zank has a social point of view, ie multiculturalism goes against support for socialism. I don't think he ever waded into the genetic arguments like cold front did.

My recollection is different, but I agree that multiculturalism works against not only support for socialism but generally support for public-goods provision and a safety net. What Wingslaught (and Jared Taylor) call "race consciousness" is spectacularly bad idea.

And I was mostly complimenting you there (said you were best poster of the year), no need to thank me by repeating the coo coo.

:) Thanks. I was just clarifying that issue, though. Not trying to restart anything.
 
Mr. Liberal: Jack V Savage
Mr. Libtard: Hollywood Nicky
Mr. Conservatard: There are plenty of potential candidates here. Of course, the low rung mouthbreathers like second sight, glennrod, Pem123 are obvious choices but I'd like to elect OldGoat. For all his ludicrous partisanship I actually quitelike the guy.
Mr. CT: IDL without shadow of a doubt.
Best Mod: Zankou
Worst Mod: Everyone likes Madmick but I'm really not keen on his approach to posting. By my reckoning, he has half the intelligence of Zankou yet twice the tendency to wade in and derive pleasure from his long-winded demolition jobs on clearly overmatched posters. That considered, I do agree with the majority of what he says.
Worst Poster of the Year: glennrod (also receives my nomination for 'most irritating overuse of sarcastic straw man posts followed by smilies')
Worst Troll of the Year: LucasWithLidOff
Best New Poster: Like A Bas
Worst New Poster: goldennirvana
 
I made another "worst poster of the year" award...sweet!, I had no idea that my traditional views rustled so many jimmies. I should learn to embrace things like gay marriage, and mass immigration of people who want to kill us if I want to improve my standing next year :rolleyes:
 
I made another "worst poster of the year" award...sweet!, I had no idea that my traditional views rustled so many jimmies. I should learn to embrace things like gay marriage, and mass immigration of people who want to kill us if I want to improve my standing next year :rolleyes:

...also receives my nomination for 'most irritating overuse of sarcastic straw man posts followed by smilies'...
 
Most Civil/Respectful Award: ripskater

Whether you disagree with his viewpoints, his beliefs or think he's a troll, he's the most civil poster on this sub-forum. This is the sub-forum for the crazies of Sherdog and the regulars seem to go off at the drop of the hat.

ripskater, no matter what you say to him, always remains respectful from what I see. If he is truly a troll, he has A LOT of restraint.
 
Thanks for the recognition. :cool:

Yes, it is true that, for the most part, I am more at home with the religious right. You deserve some credit for your insight into my posting tendencies. There have been posters (rod1 being one of them I think) who have rightly accused me of being Puritanical and I see that as a compliment.

I would say most of my views are influenced by religious thought more than anything. I am only an atheist in the sense that I don't believe in any of the god claims, but I think religion can be extremely important. I do feel religious leaders, like Pope Francis and the Dalai Lama, are extremely important figures in society and should be listened to.

Lol at DL and the most tolerant pope we have ever had as examples. Better examples for you would be someone to the right of Pat Roberts, maybe Doug Phillips.

Of course atheism has more to it than "no god". It implies more emphasis on science and rationality and less on morality and tradition. One of the reasons being that the latter can lead to boogeyman politics (def in your case), which like religion, has been used to keep the masses ignorant.

You may as well reject god but believe the world is flat for all the good your atheism is doing you.

Look it's just a username (I am not some Ghandi fanatic), yours just contrasts particularly with your "style" of posting.
 
:) Thanks. I was just clarifying that issue, though. Not trying to restart anything.


I noticed I did not get any noms this year. I think it is maybe because the conservatives have officially disowned me. I think Glenn is pretty dumb so I must be a hard lefty.
 
Back
Top