- Joined
- Mar 26, 2016
- Messages
- 23,355
- Reaction score
- 2
oh wow congress, who cares about that cesspool
That's like saying who cares about USADA, but a hundred times dumber.
oh wow congress, who cares about that cesspool
Small joint manipulation = Steven Seagull domination+1 for headbutts
Changes backmount defense & clinch. Tito #1 P4P
oh really, I thought you called yourself a "libertarian". watered down libertarian just like the fights you like, huh?That's like saying who cares about USADA, but a hundred times dumber.
oh really, I thought you called yourself a "libertarian". watered down libertarian just like the fights you like, huh?
oh, ok, now I have to search through TWENTY THREE THOUSAND shitposts to prove that you said you were a libertarian. fuck offDid I now? Show me where:
http://forums.sherdog.com/search/76687729/?q=libertarian&o=relevance&c[user][0]=502609
I'll wait.
That's just silly.reasonable human beings should try to ignore congressman as most as they can. I think if you introduced these rules one by one congress wouldn't give a fuck. also, the UFC could always try to bribe those scumbags
yeah so they would implement knees to the head of a downed opponent and the congress would simply ban them. sureThat's just silly.
I don't know whether Congress would care about the changes. That wasn't the point. The point is that the UFC wouldn't be able to operate without the blessing of the American government. You can ignore them. The UFC can not.
You're not very bright. There are only 14 instances of me using the word 'libertarian'. They're all located on the page I just linked.oh, ok, now I have to search through TWENTY THREE THOUSAND shitposts to prove that you said you were a libertarian. fuck off
'would simply ban them' The reason they were unbanned (or rather allowed to operate in more states) in the first place is because they added more rules and took away brutal techniques like that.yeah so they would implement knees to the head of a downed opponent and the congress would simply ban them. sure
not sure if I trust this crapYou're not very bright. There are only 14 instances of me using the word 'libertarian'. They're all located on the page I just linked.
I say a big NO to the 12-6 elbows. if you have a strong ass dude in there, he could cave someone's face in big time. you can kill people with those. yea they're all banned for a reason because they're all dangerous, but 12-6 elbows would just be too much.12-6 Elbows / Elbows from any angle
Knees to the Head of a Grounded Opponent
Upkicks to a Grounded Opponent
Soccer Kicks / Stomps
again, there's nothing brutal aside soccer kicks and stomps. and maybe knees to the head. and that was like 20 years ago when MMA was a really niche sport'would simply ban them' The reason they were unbanned (or rather allowed to operate in more states) in the first place is because they added more rules and took away brutal techniques like that.
Okay. Tell that to the people in charge, not me. I don't want any of these techniques added. I agree with the people that made the decision to ban them.again, there's nothing brutal aside soccer kicks and stomps. and maybe knees to the head. and that was like 20 years ago when MMA was a really niche sport
And kos vs everyone...Knees to a downed opponent would force pussies to stop cheating like Weidman vs Mousasi and Poirier vs Alvarez.