- Joined
- Jun 4, 2016
- Messages
- 2,016
- Reaction score
- 1,183
i would redefine what a down opponent his to allowed some grounded knee but not the one in the gif and allow 12-6
I like the idea of knees to the head of an opponent on his knees/failed TD position...i would redefine what a down opponent his to allowed some grounded knee but not the one in the gif and allow 12-6
There's too much "gamesmanship" with that shit... One hand down means you can't kick someone when they're down, but you can do this if they haven't quite landed on their ass...@Buff I had to vote back of the head strikes based on the gifs. I can't stand guys "intelligently defending" themselves face down on the ground exposing the back of their head because it's not allowed to be attacked.
I can do without knees to grounded opponent like this gif. But I'd say someone up to their knees or with a hand down (especially when it's gaming the rule) I'd enjoy being allowed.
Yeah.. cuz it's a foulGroin strikes would bring the most entertainment value IMO. There's a reason they show 20 replays of it when it occurs.
No, the permanent damage there is much more immediate, so it'd be way more dangerous.It would also be safer than most other illelgal techniques. It just looks bad because culturally we associate groin strikes with being a cheap fighting technique.
It would hurt a lot, but I think it would be less likey to cause permanent damage, especially when factoring in cups.Yeah.. cuz it's a foul
No, the permanent damage there is much more immediate, so it'd be way more dangerous.
Excuse me but Yushin Okami was never a big MW.Easily Grounded Knees
I've wanted knees from the north-south position since Pride-days!