- Joined
- Feb 13, 2014
- Messages
- 35,141
- Reaction score
- 951
GOAT
Last edited:
Superman sucks. Easily the worst "super hero" When a character is nigh invincible except for the biggest deus ex machina in comic existence as his only weakness (besides lack of sunlight) and even then it doesn't kill him just weakens him then you have a boring superhero. He's also got no character flaws. Just boring.
I think personally Batman is the best. Cause he is a human first and a superhero second. He wears the cape and cowl to hide his human identity. Superman is the complete opposite. Clark Kent is his secret identity. Batman is just infinitely more interesting. He has real flaws, has to actually use skill in battle and can die at any moment so it makes his universe more tense and have stakes.
I would say the superhero with the best powers though is The Flash. Dude is OP as hell. He can murderlize anything but vibrating through them.
Superman sucks. Easily the worst "super hero" When a character is nigh invincible except for the biggest deus ex machina in comic existence as his only weakness (besides lack of sunlight) and even then it doesn't kill him just weakens him then you have a boring superhero. He's also got no character flaws. Just boring.
Only Dr.Strange, and Silver Surfer stand a chance against Superman in the MCU. unless we start matching him up against the Celestials, or the Beyonder or something
I just go by reaction times. No regular man could honestly respond fast enough for superman if he went balls out. Comic logic lol
He has the same no killing rule most good guys have. The fact that he could easily kill all those guys and doesn't is kind of the point.Thing is Superman never goes balls out, I mean how many times has he break Lex Luthors neck ...exactly.
Clark going ballistic against some other hero in a fight is just VS topic logic, he never does it against Lex and Toyman who are actually villains.
Why hasn't any bad guy made kryptonite bullets?
![]()
He has the same no killing rule most good guys have. The fact that he could easily kill all those guys and doesn't is kind of the point.
Superman beats people up all the time. He can't really go nuts on humans because he'd turn them into a fine mist. He's put an absolute beating on guys in his weight class though. I mean he punched Lobo into space once because he forgot to hold back while punching him.Yes and no.
He could kill them, but he holds back a lot more than others (not just the no killing rule).
Lex has given him so much trouble and has never break his arms or something, in fact one time Lex became president of the USA and Superman just said he was not going to interfere.
Superman beating other guys will be out of characther, while other guys kicking Superman ass (in the case they could) isnt .
Superman beats people up all the time. He can't really go nuts on humans because he'd turn them into a fine mist. He's put an absolute beating on guys in his weight class though. I mean he punched Lobo into space once because he forgot to hold back while punching him.
Eh this is why most forums that debate this stuff seriously default to bloodlusted versions. Once you factor in the feels you can make an argument for any character to beat any other character regardless of power set. Boy scout rep or no he's put people down hard when he's needed to. Not being able to win against someone he can one shot with 1/100 of his strength is silly. Especially when he's literally thousands of times faster at a minimum.I mean look at the Deapool movie.
Colossus could easily kick Gina Caranos's characther ass. But his personality got in the way and he had to be saved from being choked.
Thinking Superman his going to blitz people and cut heads is more unrealistic than him holding back and getting his ass kicked .
He's beaten Mongol to a pulp many times, he beat Doomsday essentially to death. he's had crazy brawls with Lobo. He beat Darkseid to a pulp. He flew straight threw Kryptonite powered Metallo. He's beat up lots of dudes lots of times, he just doesn't punch guys into a paste like he couldSo he has to hold back and he only sometimes hits people full force when they are in his weight class , its basically what im saying.
I mean even in the Lobo case he only punched him once, its not like he beat him in to a pulp over and over again , wich actually Lobo could take since he has a godly healing factor.
He's beaten Mongol to a pulp many times, he beat Doomsday essentially to death. he's had crazy brawls with Lobo. He beat Darkseid to a pulp. He flew straight threw Kryptonite powered Metallo. He's beat up lots of dudes lots of times, he just doesn't punch guys into a paste like he could
Eh this is why most forums that debate this stuff seriously default to bloodlusted versions. Once you factor in the feels you can make an argument for any character to beat any other character regardless of power set. Boy scout rep or no he's put people down hard when he's needed to. Not being able to win against someone he can one shot with 1/100 of his strength is silly. Especially when he's literally thousands of times faster at a minimum.
I mean spiderman is a teddy bear too but he's one punched the punisher tons of times.
People go too far the other way. Characters like Batman, Daredevil, Spiderman, Superman etc have proven that while they won't kill, they also won't let themselves BE killed, and aren't above beating someone's ass when necessary.Bloodlust version makes no sense, it disregards who the characther is to begin .
I see why people do it in VS topics, but under those rules Zod/Superman will basically be the same characther, when "realistically" they will act very differently.