- Joined
- Oct 12, 2006
- Messages
- 62,004
- Reaction score
- 16,716
You mean the part where I said I agreed these were bad people?Avoiding the question isn't making your concession any less transparent.
Mick.... Mickey. Come on. You can do it.
You mean the part where I said I agreed these were bad people?Avoiding the question isn't making your concession any less transparent.
Yes, he is. Burgess has explicitly said that he is a villain.
Avoiding the question isn't making your concession any less transparent.
Then you agree he's a villain. Yes, we're all square. We're on the same page.You mean the part where I said I agreed these were bad people?
Mick.... Mickey. Come on. You can do it.
Either, doesn't matter. In the film it's never implied that Alex's behavior is "normal". Nor does any perceived trend negate that it is made clear that Alex knows the difference between right and wrong, and that he relishes in doing evil.are we talking the film or the novel, because they're two different things.
I swear to Athena.Moral relativism brah; all the hipsters are doing it.
baby wants to fuck!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Either, doesn't matter. In the film it's never implied that Alex's behavior is "normal". Nor does any perceived trend negate that it is made clear that Alex knows the difference between right and wrong, and that he relishes in doing evil.
The thing is. If he's the protagonist, he can't be the villain. We're meant to sympathize with Alex, aren't we? About how society has made him what he is and now tries to keep him tucked away, but in doing so fucks it all up?
Clarence J. Boddicker
I think it's fair to regard him however you will. To me Alex is simply representative of this villainous culture, a figurehead. Which is further reinforced via the "rehab" metaphor. Here's the deal: A CLOCKWORK ORANGE doesn't have a villain in the sense of a good versus bad story, and that's just one of my major criteria for " film villain." Without this dynamic, I tend not to think too much of this cadre of bad dudes. Not with pieces of shit like Clarence Boddicker and Nurse Ratchehtfcj. However you spell it. She's a stone bitch.it's been a while since i seen a clockwork orange, but don't we only really sympathize with alex after he's gone through the procedure and is trying to turn his life around but his past keeps catching up to him?
I think it's fair to regard him however you will. To me Alex is simply representative of this villainous culture, a figurehead. Which is further reinforced via the "rehab" metaphor. Here's the deal: A CLOCKWORK ORANGE doesn't have a villain in the sense of a good versus bad story, and that's just one of my major criteria for " film villain." Without this dynamic, I tend not to think too much of this cadre of bad dudes. Not with pieces of shit like Clarence Boddicker and Nurse Ratchehtfcj. However you spell it. She's a stone bitch.
Don't get me wrong. I get that people are measuring these characters by an If They Were Real yardstick. I just prefer the classic Good Vs Evil structure.
It's always a generational criticism, but in truth reveals that in fact WE are the villains yadda yadda yadda. I swear to god CLOCKWORK ORANGE and it's hippy granola bullshit, man .... just fuckin entertain me, Kubrick! THAT'S ALL I WANT. Not this put everything in the center of frame mathematic nonsense! SHIT!nice points. i'd say if anyone is the villain in a clockwork orange, it'd be society at large.
It's always a generational criticism, but in truth reveals that in fact WE are the villains yadda yadda yadda. I swear to god CLOCKWORK ORANGE and it's hippy granola bullshit, man .... just fuckin entertain me, Kubrick! THAT'S ALL I WANT. Not this put everything in the center of frame mathematic nonsense! SHIT!