- Joined
- Jun 13, 2014
- Messages
- 1,971
- Reaction score
- 0
Wand is awesome. Fuck the system.
What I love most about this argument is that you guys aren't discussing weather or not he cheated. People are trying to argue that no one quite had the authority to catch him cheating.
NSAC is a joke.
You can beat the mother of your children - as Floyd did - go to jail, and be welcomed back with open arms. You know, because money.
You can fail a test due to steroids, then fail ANOTHER drug test years later, and the commission will welcome you back to the state, and insist that your next fight is in Nevada.
Or, you can try to run. If your name is Overeem, you get nine months. If your name is Wand - you get life. What a joke.
I don't even like Wand all that much (I was hoping to see Chael put Wand on his ass - until they both failed or ran from tests) but this is nonsense. Wouldn't expect anything else from NSAC.
It doesn't need to be to place him under their jurisdiction. He is a fighter. Who just announced his plans to fight within their bounds. He also has a contract with the UFC, who are also bound by the authority of the ACs.
What I love most about this argument is that you guys aren't discussing weather or not he cheated. People are trying to argue that no one quite had the authority to catch him cheating.
Pathetic.
please tell me how he does this while under contract to the UFC?
your two points above the part in bold are 100% on the money.
But the Overeem and Wand cases are not the same and people need to stop saying they are.
Overeem ran (UFC 146) but came back immediately when informed he would be in serious trouble if he didn't. He took the test and failed.
Wand ran and when told to come back, fled to brazil.
what is the logic behind zuffa wanting wanderlei banned?
Do I honestlyu believe he cheated? Absolutely. But if you think that is a more important point of discussion than the extent of a government's authority, you're pretty narrow minded.
The cases are also different in that Overeem was a licensed fighter who had just fought under that license in a sanctioned event(and had beaten the shit out of his opponent). Wanderlei was not licensed, not pursuing a license, and had not fought nor was contracted to fioght anyone under NSAC jurisdiction. If you can see the difference you pointed out but not this, you must have some sort of selective blindness.your two points above the part in bold are 100% on the money.
But the Overeem and Wand cases are not the same and people need to stop saying they are.
Overeem ran (UFC 146) but came back immediately when informed he would be in serious trouble if he didn't. He took the test and failed.
Wand ran and when told to come back, fled to brazil.
your two points above the part in bold are 100% on the money.
But the Overeem and Wand cases are not the same and people need to stop saying they are.
Overeem ran (UFC 146) but came back immediately when informed he would be in serious trouble if he didn't. He took the test and failed.
Wand ran and when told to come back, fled to brazil.
They were only able to test Vitor because Vitor allowed them to, and signed a contract to that effect. Even then, they did not punish him because at that time they did not believe they had the jurisdiction to do so since he wasn't licensed. Wand didn't even sign the testing contracts, so they would have even less jurisdiction regarding to this situation.
The regulation defines contestant, but I don't see where it says they have automatic jurisdiction over anyone who fits that definition. "Any person who engages in unarmed combat for remuneration" is an incredibly broad definition.
As I stated before, I believe that a professional fighter who has spent the last ~8 months promoting and training for a fight is absolutely under the authority of the Athletic commissions to drug test. Plain and simple.
This is not a matter of governmental over-reach. The didn't test and then try to fine my grandmother. This is a matter of a guy trying to cheat and exploit the system and the system saying "LOL no."
Do I honestlyu believe he cheated? Absolutely. But if you think that is a more important point of discussion than the extent of a government's authority, you're pretty narrow minded.
Right. So the NSAC has complete jurisdiction over anyone and everyone who trains to fight and has shown intention to fight anywhere in the world. Why then, did they bother to bring several pages worth of contracts for Wanderlei to sign before taking the test? Surely with their omnipresent jurisdiction that wouldn't be necessary. And why did they not punish Vitor when he failed his drug test? He had a "potential intention" to fight in Nevada as well, doesn't that instantly grant them unlimited power?As I stated before, I believe that a professional fighter who has spent the last ~8 months promoting and training for a fight is absolutely under the authority of the Athletic commissions to drug test. Plain and simple.
This is not a matter of governmental over-reach. The didn't test and then try to fine my grandmother. This is a matter of a guy trying to cheat and exploit the system and the system saying "LOL no."
Ends justify means?
Police break down the door without a warrant, and find Marijuana/weapons.
We found weapons! Who cares about a warrant! Ends justify means!
Yeah!
What the hell happened to due process?
Pathetic that people only use the end result and don't care that the gov't was out of line, like they usually are.
As I stated before, I believe that a professional fighter who has spent the last ~8 months promoting and training for a fight is absolutely under the authority of the Athletic commissions to drug test. Plain and simple.
This is not a matter of governmental over-reach. The didn't test and then try to fine my grandmother. This is a matter of a guy trying to cheat and exploit the system and the system saying "LOL no."
Okay, if the commission did not have the power to fine Silva, and Silva is not going to seek a lisence in the state anymore, why would he be paying his lawyer to fight the decision in court?
Second, since Silva had had a license in Navada before he falls under this provision of the commission rules....
"NAC 467.089  Effect of expiration of license on jurisdiction of Commission. (NRS 467.030)  The expiration of a license does not deprive the Commission of jurisdiction to:
1.  Proceed with an investigation of the licensee;
2.  Proceed with an action or disciplinary proceeding against the licensee;
3.  Render a decision to suspend or revoke the license; or
4.  Otherwise discipline the licensee."
http://leg.state.nv.us/NAC/NAC-467.html