Do you know how people can see you're simply biased?
- Beating Costa who could not make weight and just got his soul taken by Izzy just does not do it for me. Tim was a very good fighter and in his prime that only lost to champs, much like Marvin
yes, let's ignore that not cutting weight means Costa didn't even have to deplete himself, let's also ignore the fact that Costa, without depleting himself, went 5 rounds and didn't gas when normal Costa usually starts to slow down in the third, let's also ignore how Costa vs Vettori went. Nope, let's just focus on "b-b-but Costa had his soul taken by Izzy so he must be weaker! Costa couldn't even make weight!"
Dude, stop embarrassing yourself. Oh, and "only lost to champs" lol kid you can't even fathom that champs doesn't mean powerful across time and is comparable to all champs in all periods, it just mean they were the best during that time. A champ could be not even top 10 in certain time periods. Your entire argument is vague and general. Next time, try saying who those champs were and why losing to them means something and don't ignore facts just to help your argument. You're not winning money by winning arguments, it's just a forum discussion, no need to lie and be that biased.