International Tucker Carlson in Russia to interview Vladimir Putin UPDATE - Also Dugin

SandisLL said:
BTW Trumptards loves phrase " weapons pointed on Russia " and this is total idiotism...
What kind of weapons? While in reality dumb ukraine had deMilitarized 32 years in row and cryed that west even doesn't sell them 120 mm mortars....

Maybe for Ukraine really was worth to apply to be incorporated in Russia ? Cos west anyway isn't good for them at all and they should cope with reality .....

Westerners aren't effective and ....sorry ....
Such public buying Kremlin's propaganda is disaster and then better .....to tell reality that western world had lost vs China, Iran, North Korea, Belarus and Russia?
Click to expand...

Its very bizarre on how all these analogies Russia is the victim and only defends itself

Russia has more nukes and bases closer to NATO than viceversa, they have nukes in Kaliningrad very close to major European nations after all.
 
Rod1 said:
Its very bizarre on how all these analogies Russia is the victim and only defends itself

Russia has more nukes and bases closer to NATO than viceversa, they have nukes in Kaliningrad very close to major European nations after all.
Click to expand...
They always had nukes in St Pete and Kaliningrad...
Btw in city cos depots for torpedos with warheads...
 
Super_Nintendo said:
for being "an enemy of The People". ie. anyone who resists or opposes the left's agenda.

these dummies have fully bought into the us vs them divide and they're "on the right side of history". these are types that allow genocides to happen in plain sight.
Click to expand...

Weird, because Russia is pretty clear that its the West vs them, they repeatedly say so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cid
I have no problem with a Western journalist interviewing Putin. However, I object to Putin getting to cherrypick someone who is most likely not going to challenge him or ask any critical questions. Putin is going to use this as a propaganda opportunity to influence the American public and Tucker Carlson will most likely be content to sit back and let him do that.
 
Vergilius said:
I have no problem with a Western journalist interviewing Putin. However, I object to Putin getting to cherrypick someone who is most likely not going to challenge him or ask any critical questions. Putin is going to use this as a propaganda opportunity to influence the American public and Tucker Carlson will most likely be content to sit back and let him do that.
Click to expand...
Putin is former KGB ( FSB ) director and his hobby is to manipulate with ppl by using words.
Both these Patrushev and Putin IMHO better prefered to have as president Medvedev and manipulate behind scene ....while if vodka too much then they should step in scene as No1 and No2...
 
Vergilius said:
I have no problem with a Western journalist interviewing Putin. However, I object to Putin getting to cherrypick someone who is most likely not going to challenge him or ask any critical questions. Putin is going to use this as a propaganda opportunity to influence the American public and Tucker Carlson will most likely be content to sit back and let him do that.
Click to expand...
I called putin saying im not a fascist. Biden is the real fascist. Look what they are doing to trump.
 
SandisLL said:
When Trump will be elected most likely he will offer Putin some deal about Ukraine.
Most likely to cede part of Ukraine to Russia and to sign bunch of papers.....
In scenario A. UKR and Putin will sign all Putin and Trump will tell.
In scenario B. Putin will demand more and then Trump will push bill even more than 61 b for Ukr and Russia then will see HELL....
Click to expand...

Putin would likely be very happy with Trump offering Russia to keep parts of the Ukraine. The next step for them is their hope that someone like Trump will cause NATO to crumble as an alliance as he sowed division in the west the last time he was president and it seemed like Rusisa hoped it would be enough to not have the west unify to help Ukraine in light of their gas price warfare.

If they want to do that they would rearm as best as they can and then attack a fairly remote and insignificant part of NATO, like some part of northern Finland, with some pretense of wanting a buffer zone or something like that. That way they will test if NATO will respond to Article 5 for that, especially the US. If that doesn't happen the alliance is pretty much dead in practice. If NATO does respond it's not all that hard for Russia to back out as they won't have done damage to any significant region, so there's not that much risk of NATO going further than pushing the Russians back.

Whether they would dare to do something like that remains to be seen but it's a way to attack NATO without fully committing, so low risk compared to the possible reward.
 
Squarechoke said:
Putin would likely be very happy with Trump offering Russia to keep parts of the Ukraine. The next step for them is their hope that someone like Trump will cause NATO to crumble as an alliance as he sowed division in the west the last time he was president and it seemed like Rusisa hoped it would be enough to not have the west unify to help Ukraine in light of their gas price warfare.

If they want to do that they would rearm as best as they can and then attack a fairly remote and insignificant part of NATO, like some part of northern Finland, with some pretense of wanting a buffer zone or something like that. That way they will test if NATO will respond to Article 5 for that, especially the US. If that doesn't happen the alliance is pretty much dead in practice. If NATO does respond it's not all that hard for Russia to back out as they won't have done damage to any significant region, so there's not that much risk of NATO going further than pushing the Russians back.

Whether they would dare to do something like that remains to be seen but it's a way to attack NATO without fully committing, so low risk compared to the possible reward.
Click to expand...
There unfortunately is also another scenario where Putin might create mesh even without direct troops usage...

Moldova.
Poor country with high unemployment %....
So cheaper to hire traitors, hooligans and provocators than in EU. Considerably cheaper and this is very important...
+ seperatists controlled area in Transistria already does exist 30 years in row, and it is literally poor in huge dependence from Russia area with....a lot of weapons warehouses... and they had damn a lot of time to build bunkers and tunnels so Moldova doesn't have tools to kick them out ... .... ....
While separatists are in so huge dependence from Kremlin's support that can't resist for long term vs pressure from Kremlin: Kremlin is paying for natural gas they are using, supplying fuel etc....
___
Russia also wants to prevent Moldova to join EU and pressure EU with refugees influx.
.
So war in Moldova might be cheap for Kremlin tool to torture Ukraine and fill EU with more refugees + to prevent Moldova to get accepted in EU....

This also will warrant that IF Russia will decide to annex Moldova before accepted in EU, sanctions etc will be more soft ...

Then there are 2 poor regions controlled by separatists backed by Kremlin in Georgia.
Russia might force them to do famous " referendums " in order to get them deIure be incorporated in Russian federation .....otherwise threat with cutting OFF support and trade with them.....
 
USA!USA! said:
What compromise? Russia literally invaded a sovereign country lol - the Russians could have peace tomorrow if they wanted it.

Tucker has you right where Putin wants you.
Click to expand...

USA has invaded how many sovereign nations now? And the countries they invaded are halfway across the world. USA is bombing Syria right now, which is a sovereign nation. I suppose you have nothing to say about that though.

Meanwhile Putin is defending his backyard. He realizes how corrupt Ukraine is, and he has seen the west take advantage of that for the last ten years, as well as threaten nato expansion into the region. It's the west meddling that has caused all of this. Open your eyes fool.

Russia and Ukraine had a peace deal worked out just a short time into the conflict. Boris Johnson flew into Kiev and told Ukraine/zelensky not to make a peace deal and to keep fighting, promising billions of dollars and weaponry to do so.

The west is responsible for this entire war going back to 2014. They couldn't keep their hands out of the cookie jar. Now the poor ukranian people as well as Russian people are suffering the effects of a long drawn out war, all because of the west.

Russia cannot just leave and have peace now. Are you crazy?
 
Lazy question- has the interview happened yet? Is it available anywhere to see for my self?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

ShadowRun
International Hillary Clinton would nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize if he helps end war in Ukraine
2 3
Replies
42
Views
1K
HereticBD
HereticBD

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,275,240
Messages
57,976,773
Members
175,888
Latest member
MEthzale

Share this page

Back
Top