Trump/Ukraine v26 Trump Impeachment Trial---The Jig Is Up! The God King Trump Rules On! Trump 2020!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Happy Man said:
what cover up? The house could have looking into ANYONE they wanted. They called who they wanted, and they got nothing.

now they want to blame their failure on something else.

we’ve heard this same spiel every year of trump.
Click to expand...

This is not true. There are about 15-20 subpoenas that have been ignored.
 
andnowweknow said:
I am in favor of Bolton at least, Mulvaney too in a perfect world...and Joe Biden. Of course others are fine to if the senate wants that. I think Joe Biden is a coward if he doesn't step up and call to be testified.
Click to expand...
I feel the exact same way. Why are you painting me as some Trump apologist now?
 
Hungry Joe said:
Is there any one who would argue that it Is in the best interest of the USA to not allow further witnesses in the impeachment trial? It seems obvious to me that any senator who votes against allowing a witness who is willing to testify under oath that they have relevant testimony is putting their parties interest before that of the nation.
Click to expand...

It's in the best interests of America to end this divisive political sham and move on.

Lots of people may want to testify during a high profile case. That doesn't mean you let everyone who simply wants to.
 
Da Speeit said:
I feel the exact same way. Why are you painting me as some Trump apologist now?
Click to expand...
Because your reply was all irrelevant GOP witnesses. There's a reason you had to state you're a registered Democrat.
 
Da Speeit said:
They can go to the Judiciary at any time. Why didn't they?
Why did they decline to pursue Bolton in the house?
Click to expand...

That's not how subpoenas work.

It is the responsibility of the subpoena'd party to dispute the validity of the subpoena in court. If you merely ignore the subpoena you are automatically held in contempt.
 
Rational Poster said:
This is not true. There are about 15-20 subpoenas that have been ignored.
Click to expand...
Yes, they were supposed to go to court where they’d have won. Nobody knows why they didn’t.

the Supreme Court would have upheld the subpoena power of congress. It’s bewildering that they didn’t.
 
Farmer Br0wn said:
It's in the best interests of America to end this divisive political sham and move on.

Lots of people may want to testify during a high profile case. That doesn't mean you let everyone who simply wants to.
Click to expand...
If we wanted to end this divisive political sham we would impeach Trump.
 
Happy Man said:
Yes, they were supposed to go to court where they’d have won. Nobody knows why they didn’t.

the Supreme Court would have upheld the subpoena power of congress. It’s bewildering that they didn’t.
Click to expand...
See my last post to @Da Speeit .

That is just not true.
 
Da Speeit said:
Dude, no lol
You believe that to be the case, but it's not. Sorry. If it were true we wouldn't even be discussing it right now. It's wrong. Factually wrong.
Click to expand...

No, it's not, you're wrong.
 
Happy Man said:
Yes, they were supposed to go to court where they’d have won. Nobody knows why they didn’t.

the Supreme Court would have upheld the subpoena power of congress. It’s bewildering that they didn’t.
Click to expand...
What's bewildering is that you won't acknowledge Trump's delay tactics. If they waited for the SCOTUS to rule on subpoenas the election would have come and gone.
 
LangfordBarrow said:
What's bewildering is that you won't acknowledge Trump's delay tactics. If they waited for the SCOTUS to rule on subpoenas the election would have come and gone.
Click to expand...
So "We don't have time to use the law"
okay. Great case
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,044
Messages
55,463,566
Members
174,786
Latest member
JoyceOuthw

Share this page

Back
Top