- Joined
- Feb 3, 2008
- Messages
- 40,120
- Reaction score
- 19,776
Sure, but we dont impeach presidents for what they'd probably do.
alls I know is that there's this whole Ukraine business doesn't look good. but I doubt he'll even get impeached.
Sure, but we dont impeach presidents for what they'd probably do.
What if it was held up a week before the call and released in September? Would that change your view on the impropriety of Trump's request?That defense money was already paid before the phone call.
I think trump wanted to hold it up, but it wasn’t
I see his words. Can you point to a question in thst statement? A plea? A command?
Nope. Just to much TDS to acknowledge reality.
Is North Korea continuing to test the nuclear delivery systems with their lips touching so it's ok? Putin's mouth is closed in a wide satisfied grin.I notice how you left out any specific criticism.
The bull in a china shop approach works. Ever heard of the madman theory?
I’m not sure if you’ve noticed, but our enemies are hiding and keeping their mouths shut.
That’s a fancy way of admitting the text specifically said no QPQ.
I was paraphrasing. And you must be talking about what the guy was asking not to leave a text trail said. He was responding to an indignant diplomat that said it was crazy to tie our aid to their assistance in this witch hunt.A) that’s not what was said
B) private texts specifically state no QPQ.
The fact you have you lie about your claim says everything.
Is North Korea continuing to test the nuclear delivery systems with their lips touching so it's ok? Putin's mouth is closed in a wide satisfied grin.
How is it appropriate to ask The President's lawyer to investigate anything. Rudy trying to cover his ass but let's wait and see if they offer up a scapegoat.Rudy on FOX:
"I never talked to a Ukrainian official until the State Department called me and asked me to do it. And then I reported every conversation back to them. Laura, I’m a pretty good lawyer, just a country lawyer, but it’s all right here, right here. The first call from the State Department.”
I was paraphrasing. And you must be talking about what the guy was asking not to leave a text trail said. He was responding to an indignant diplomat that said it was crazy to tie our aid to their assistance in this witch hunt.

Bobby's so heavily invested he'll go down with the ship.2 texts from a Ukrainian diplomat cited QPQ. Then 2 responses from a person who had previously donated 1 million dollars to Trump immediately asks for the in-writing convo to cease because it’s damning evidence to the politician whose pockets Sondland just lined.
“Are we now saying that security assistance and WH meeting are conditioned on investigations?” Taylor wrote on September “Call me,” Sondland answered.
Eight days later, Taylor wrote: “As I said on the phone, I think it’s crazy to withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.” Sondland responded by denying that this was the case — and urging him not to text about the matter anymore.
Hmmmm... wondered what they talked about on the phone. Seems clearly it was the topic of withholding security assistance.
Funny how you have to remove any context from the texts in your argument. Pretending this being a million dollar trump donator denying trump did wrong while also shitting his pants any time the conversation occurred in writing doesn’t mean anything is very dumb. Wonder why he was so scared to have this in writing?
You're falling on your sword for the word should while avoiding the context and that it's been reported he broached the topic with the Chinese in an earlier conversation.Im saying he didnt ASK China to do anything. Your hatred of Trump won't let you acknowledge that fact.
Can you read? There were more than one text.
You have to be handicapped to consider the notion of context as something “fancy”.
“Why would someone who gave a politician a million dollars not admit in writing that politician broke a law that could get them impeached. Derp”
How is it appropriate to ask The President's lawyer to investigate anything. Rudy trying to cover his ass but let's wait and see if they offer up a scapegoat.
Did you give him an American history book when you heard him say that?
Bobby's so heavily invested he'll go down with the ship.
1. Wait for the transcripts to come out. As I stated it was reported so needs to be investigated. That code word level secure server is going to be a treasure trove.So 1) show me him asking for assiassist from China and 2) admit that the DNC recieved foreign assistance in 2016.
You're cherry picking...That’s a fancy way of admitting the text specifically said no QPQ.
If that is provided at some point will you change your opinion?I don't disagree with anything you said except that he asked China to investigate.
If you can point to him ASKING China to do it or name the Chinese official that he made a request to.
1. As I stated it was reported so needs to be investigated.
