Ok, so, you're typing, so I know you can read and type... I guess it's just in the comprehension portion that you fall down?
The Rolling Stone article tells the story of a black reporter that was there filming/reporting on the riot. He wasn't instigating shit, he wasn't AntiFa, and he doesn't even vote ffs. What IS interesting is that he says the resistance to the rioters wasn't anything close to that faced by the BLM people in Portland when he was reporting on that shit show.
Sure enough he hates Trump, but he has an absolutely valid reason for being there and the FBI thought his work was valid, 'cause after questioning, and taking his footage, he was released.
The Fox article details the same crowd funded journalist's story from a slightly more right slighted angle.
He's easy to spot, since he's one of the few black folks attending the Redneck Rumble.
Neither puts forward evidence of AntiFa or BLM's prescence.
Is that all you got?