I already made clear my lack of knowledge of the details of the case, to wit,
"I wasn't on the jury. I was not present in court while the evidence was presented, so I don't know if your claim is true or not. The decision wasn't up to me. But he was found liable and IIRC it was just recently upheld on appeal. They're the ones who say he did it. Since he lost, the benefit of the doubt goes to the victim, not that walking bag of orange shit."
LOL @ the suggestion I'm trying to come off as having made "an informed choice"
Very judgemental for someone who is illiterate.