Reports: Conor McGregor Could Face Perjury Charges in Sexual Assault Appeal

[mmacrisis]

The sooner we are all rid of this piece of crap the better. Conor's fighting career has been over for a while and now he is an influencer at best, which is something I personally have zero need for.

 

[Benoitthegr8]

word has it that the the evidence pulled is a left handed 4oz glove that is soaked with biological fluid, nobody knows what or who Mac’s put his paws on.

 

[fedorthegoat777]

You'd think a character like this wouldn't be able to attract a single vote should he put to an election.

But the family values crowd consistently back this kind of candidate and will probably claim he is a victim of a witch hunt.

Because even a drunk coke head is better than letting a bunch of immigrants and terrorists take over the country.

 

[Benoitthegr8]

coke and alcohol fueled binges are pretty common with McGregor these days

 

[Mohawk Banditó]

Because even a drunk coke head is better than letting a bunch of immigrants and terrorists take over the country.

 

[TITS]

"Conor, why'd you do it?"

 

[Kung Fu Kowboy]

"Conor, why'd you do it?"

Dude went full Sherdogger.. no punches pulled.

 

[Siver!]

Because even a drunk coke head is better than letting a bunch of immigrants and terrorists take over the country.

Think of it as getting a lift from someone.

Do you want the driver to be a) a drunk cokehead or b) someone who doesn't overtly hate foreigners.

 

[Smooth Princess]

I'll be curious to see how this all shakes out, especially as I'm not really knowledgeable about criminal law in Ireland. In the US typically you can't be charged with perjury if you withdraw the false statements prior to the conclusion of the trial.

 

[koa pomaikai]

@koa pomaikai

Liar. Don’t lie. When did I ever say he would be found innocent?

I said there was new evidence and asked people if that evidence could lead to innocence. Don’t be a misleading prick.

Here’s the actual thread, and I already posted about the evidence being withdrawn too.

News Thread 'Conor Mcgregor’s appeal of sex assault verdict about to be heard; new eye witness evidence to be examined to show Mcgregor’s innocence.'

Jun 27, 2025

We are closing in on July when Mcgregor will have his sexual assault verdict appeal be heard.

His lawyers have prepared bombshell evidence that includes neighbors witnessing the alleged victim’s partner attacking her and assaulting her after the alleged attack by Conor. Mcgregor’s lawyer states this is what caused the bruising that Ms. Hand claims was from Mcgregor.

McGregor legal team submits bombshell evidence to sexual assault appeal

McGregor’s lawyers are putting forth evidence they say proves their client was not the one responsible for the bruising on victim Nikita Hand’s body.

www.mmamania.com

“Ms. O’Reilly described seeing Mr. Redmond push Ms. Hand and Ms. Hand fell to the...

• koa pomaikai
• Replies: 23
• Forum: The Lightweights

• 

Thread 'Conor Mcgregor’s right against self incrimination allegedly infringed. The rape case appeal hearing of Ms. Hand. Evidence also withdrawn.'

Jul 1, 2025

“Opening the appeal, Mr Farrell described as of “totemic importance” a ground of appeal alleging errors of law in how Mr Gordon and the trial judge approached Mr McGregor’s “no comment” responses, made when interviewed by gardaí after giving them a statement in response to Ms Hand’s claim of rape.

Questions from Mr Gordon suggesting the no comment responses were at odds with Mr McGregor saying he co-operated fully with gardaí, involved an effort to go behind the privilege against self-incrimination, counsel submitted.”

Also Mcgregor in an effort to stay true to the law also withdrew his...

• koa pomaikai
• Replies: 18
• Forum: The War Room

• 

 

[Söze Aldo]

 

[Shaolin Alan]

​

Conor McGregor’s appeal of being found civilly liable for sexual assault last year has taken an interesting turn.

According to a reports from BBC.com and the Irish Mirror, the Court of Appeal hearing concluded on Wednesday, with a full decision expected at a later date. Perhaps the most noteworthy happening occurred when McGregor’s legal team elected to withdraw what would have been significant evidence in his case at the beginning of the appeal on Tuesday.




This past November, the former UFC two-division champion was found civilly liable for sexually assaulting Hand at a Dublin hotel in December 2018 and ordered to pay the victim nearly $260,000 in damages. During the civil case, Hand alleged to have suffered a number of injuries on her body from the encounter, including bruising.

The aforementioned evidence in the McGregor appeal came from Samantha O’Reilly and Steven Cummins, who were former neighbors of the victim, Nikita Hand. They alleged to have witnessed an altercation between Hand and her partner on the same night, prior to her meeting McGregor. During a preliminary hearing it was suggested that the bruising on Hand’s body came from that dispute rather than McGregor. Hand denied the claims and was prepared to take the stand as a witness during cross examinations.

Evidence Withdrawal in McGregor Appeal Surprises Judges​

However, the proposed new evidence was withdrawn by McGregor’s legal team on the grounds that there was no corroboration from the witnesses. According to the report, the judges on the appeal panel did not understand why the decision was made. Meanwhile, Hand’s lawyer demanded an apology for being “put through the wringer” regarding the evidence, which had already been made public in the media.

As a result, Hand’s lawyer requested that the Court of Appeal refer the matter to the Director of Public Prosecutions, which will determine whether perjury occurred and if any of the involved parties could face criminal prosecution.

McGregor did not appear at the appeal hearing.




READ HERE

Reports: Conor McGregor Could Face Perjury Charges in Sexual Assault Appeal

Conor McGregor’s appeal of

www.sherdog.com

Spoiler

@HHJ

@fujitsugroundnpound

@Neck&Neck
@Arqueto @BroRogan @Carl Drogo @lsa
@StonedLemur @Fight Professor @TerrorTimmy @Elvis. @ryun253 @don't ask @C0NCH3TO @MEAN357 @Cooliox @mudrubble @Bobby Boulders @Simple Southerner @svmr_db @Luthien @BoxerMaurits @Neck&Neck @SeattleFightFan @Ares Black @SalvadorAllende @Arm Barbarian @Blanqa Blanqua @Royce's Gi @Cooliox @Krixes @MXZT @wisdom blows @nonoob @Mohawk Banditó @JKS @SuperNerd @2004 account @Mammothman @Bushwhacker B @Siver! @TITS @Cowboy Kurt Angle @Jose Beehive @MEAN357 @NoBiasJustMMA @FlyingDeathKick @Doughie99 @13Seconds @CPH @Kenny Powerth @OldBoy91 @Kryptt @Paynebringer @HI SCOTT NEWMAN @Poirierfan @SenorFranko @MMALOPEZ @Hellowhosthat @Get To Da Choppa @BangBang @Substance Abuse @John makfresshi @Islam Imamate @Wong_Wongster_Irish @TCE @Jackonfire @helax @Iroh

@koa pomaikai

@Kowboy On Sherdog is the GOAT admin for allowing us to call out @koa pomaikai garbage Rape Apologist PR account!!

 

[Mohawk Banditó]

Liar. Don’t lie. When did I ever say he would be found innocent?

Probably in every hope and dream you've had since.

 

[rear naked ankle pick]

funny how all internet "fight" fans care more about drama than actual fighting. Grow up, you're like 30

 

[koa pomaikai]

A channel 4 news story covering Mcgregor as a fighter and his supporters/opposition in Ireland.

 

[Lord Pyjamas]

Who was the idiot insisting McGregor was going to be 'found innocent' from this new evidence?

It was me.
But to my defence I was really drunk and had not read up much about it.

 

[Mohawk Banditó]

funny how all internet "fight" fans care more about drama than actual fighting. Grow up, you're like 30

We're talking about Conor. "Fighting" is completely irrelevant in this discussion.

 

[Aurelian]

 

[Pilo]

What the fuck does this irrelevant shit news and person have to do with MMA/UFC at this point?

lol

 

[Captain Herb]

Idk, seems rather vague

Their claims have now been totally withdrawn by McGregor - with Ms Hand's Counsel seeking an apology from him over the ordeal. It comes after Mr Gordon had asked the Judges yesterday that the court “ought to allow me to cross-examine Ms. O'Reilly and her partner and Mr. Staines and then refer the matter for perjury proceedings to the Director of Public Prosecutions and subornation of perjury against Mr. McGregor.”

Reserving their judgement on McGregor’s actual appeal, main Judge Isobel Kennedy said she was referring the matter to the DPP. The DPP will examine whether any potential perjury has occurred and anyone found to be suspected or that could face criminal prosecution.

But then later:

The couple had sworn affidavits claiming they heard a row between Ms Hand and her then partner on the night of 9 December 2018, after the alleged rape, with Ms O'Reilly claiming she saw the row from her bedrooom in a house across the road.

She claimed Ms Hand's then boyfriend pushed her and she saw him moving his arms and hips as though he was punching and kicking her.

Mr Cummins had claimed he was woken by screams and shouts coming from Ms Hand's house but said he did not see what had happened. Their claims were been totally withdrawn by McGregor on Tuesday - with Judge Kennedy criticising the “last minute” move.

But then it returns to:

He indicated that he had intended to cross examine Ms O’Reilly on the contents of that documentation before her evidence was withdrawn by McGregor.

He told the court that the claims made by the couple had been opened in court and widely reported in the media - claims that McGregor’s side he said were now conceding were “lies.”

So the responsibility seems to be pointed in multiple directions at different times

Right, they're saying the couple lied in the affidavit but McGregor asked them to do it, which is the subornation of perjury charge.