Crime Trump loses appeal against E Jean Carroll for sexual abuse and defamation

[jefferz]

Correct. The guy im quoting puts stock in verdicts, but I know he doesn't agree with that one. Im demonstrating to him that its possible to disagree with a verdict, because he does the same thing. Follow?

Oh, we all know what you're doing.
There's no reason to beat around the bush.

 

[Bob Gray]

Oh, we all know what you're doing.
There's no reason to beat around the bush.

No reason to do exactly what you're doing in this post? Just say it. I've been completely direct in this entire thread.

 

[Khaosan]

I wonder how many rapist apologists in here have daughters.

 

[idrankyourbeer]

I wonder how many rapist apologists in here have daughters.

i wonder how many of them think of their daughters the way that dopey mcgropey thinks about his? once, when talking about ivanka, he asked if it was weird to find your daughter more attractive than your wife. ivanka was 13 at the time.

this is not to mention all the times that doe 174 has sexualized his daughter with rush limbaugh and friends. and did you know the one thing that the mandarin molester and his daughter have the most in common? molestini cheetolini said the answer is sex. and remember that time where dopey mcgropey raw dogged some whore from the gangbang videos right after telling her that she reminded him of his daughter? the courts sure do after an impartial panel of jurors selected by zesto molesto's lawyers and company found him guilty on 34 felony counts.

 

[rearnakedchoke]

I wonder how many rapist apologists in here have daughters.

I’ve been saying this for a while. When trump said “I’ll be dating her in 10 years” to a 10 year old on the escalator, the sherchuds in here would have yucked it up with Donny, thinking it was hilarious. Even if it were their daughter.

 

[Confucamus]

Certainly it happens but none come to mind.

If we were talking about cases where you feel a black person was railroaded, you most definitely would have a massive list to copy and paste.

Often it involves suppression of evidence or bad eye witness. Lots of cases are overturned during appeal or overturned because further evidence becomes available like DNA tests. As with the OJ trial, the prosecution messed up and the lead investigator was proven to be a lying racist if I remember correctly. So, one could point to problems with the trial.

Or that jurors on that trials admitting their decision was influenced by the Rodney King trial, as they considered it payback?

Trump had a jury trial where his team approved of the jury. He lost. He had numerous appeals and lost them all.

What do you see that all these people are missing?

Yeah, that they made their decision based off of no evidence other than the testimony of a woman who couldn't remember many details including what year it even happened in, has a history of false rape allegations, and said Trump got semen on a dress she was wearing which wasn't even being sold yet at the time of the "assault." That's just a few pieces that come to my mind.

I know enough to understand you probably see a lot of yourself in that idiot man child.

Why does maga have such a man crush on that idiot kid?

I wouldn't be able to convince you otherwise, so there's no point responding to that dumb question. You don't know shit about the case. If you want to revive the Rittenhouse thread so we don't derail here, I'd be happy to educate you on that case. It's the exact opposite of the E Jean Carroll case in that there is actual indisputable evidence of Rittenhouse's innocence.

 

[HomeCheese]

If we were talking about cases where you feel a black person was railroaded, you most definitely would have a massive list to copy and paste.


Or that jurors on that trials admitting their decision was influenced by the Rodney King trial, as they considered it payback?


Yeah, that they made their decision based off of no evidence other than the testimony of a woman who couldn't remember many details including what year it even happened in, has a history of false rape allegations, and said Trump got semen on a dress she was wearing which wasn't even being sold yet at the time of the "assault." That's just a few pieces that come to my mind.


I wouldn't be able to convince you otherwise, so there's no point responding to that dumb question. You don't know shit about the case. If you want to revive the Rittenhouse thread so we don't derail here, I'd be happy to educate you on that case. It's the exact opposite of the E Jean Carroll case in that there is actual indisputable evidence of Rittenhouse's innocence.

What the heck are you talking about, "black person was railroaded"? Where are you pulling this shit?

So you disagree with the evidence, are you a lawyer or in the legal field? I'm gonna trust various judges and a jury over your untrained opinion unless you can give a good reason otherwise. I have heard Trump brag about doing exactly what she said he did so it's not hard for me to imagine she is telling the truth.

I'll go back to what you said earlier, you suggested I had TDS. Try to take a look for 30,000 feet, without your emotions. Various appeals judges and a duly appointed jury sifted through everything a found the verdict just. You imagine yourself smarter than all of them and believe you know the real truth even though Trump said he does exactly what she said he did.

Have you ever considered you might have TDS?

 

[Confucamus]

What the heck are you talking about, "black person was railroaded"? Where are you pulling this shit?

Considering how much racist shit you spew on here, it's pretty obvious.

So you disagree with the evidence, are you a lawyer or in the legal field?

I don't need to be. Is every juror a lawyer?

I'm gonna trust various judges and a jury over your untrained opinion unless you can give a good reason otherwise.

There's no reason possible that would change your mind. This is the result you wanted most.

I'll go back to what you said earlier, you suggested I had TDS.

Suggested is putting it lightly.

Try to take a look for 30,000 feet, without your emotions. Various appeals judges and a duly appointed jury sifted through everything a found the verdict just. You imagine yourself smarter than all of them and believe you know the real truth even though Trump said he does exactly what she said he did.

We all heard what the jurors heard in the Carroll case. You're free to pretend that you agree with the jurors verdict. However, can you explain why the American voters didn't buy this story either and chose to re-elect Trump to a second term, winning the popular vote and sweeping every swing state? Do you imagine you're smarter than them?

Have you ever considered you might have TDS?

No, because I didn't have an emotional breakdown because of Trump winning the 2016 election.

 

[HomeCheese]

Considering how much racist shit you spew on here, it's pretty obvious.


I don't need to be. Is every juror a lawyer?


There's no reason possible that would change your mind. This is the result you wanted most.


Suggested is putting it lightly.


We all heard what the jurors heard in the Carroll case. You're free to pretend that you agree with the jurors verdict. However, can you explain why the American voters didn't buy this story either and chose to re-elect Trump to a second term, winning the popular vote and sweeping every swing state? Do you imagine you're smarter than them?


No, because I didn't have an emotional breakdown because of Trump winning the 2016 election.

Glad to you didn't have an emotional breakdown in 2016. Odd flex but okay.

Several times you mentioned black people getting railroaded and I did think of a good example, the Central Park five. Trump still says they are guilty even though they were cleared on appeal. The justice system prevailed in the end but not before fucking these kids over completely.

How come Trump didn't win any of his appeals?

Clearly he's more guilty than the Central Park five. What kind of slack does Trump cut these kids once they got off? None. He still claims they are guilty.

On one side we have a duly appointed jury, a trial judge, various appeals judges and the entire justice system and on the other side we have Confucamus and Bob Grey.

Who is more likely to have TDS? LOL!

 

[Confucamus]

Glad to you didn't have an emotional breakdown in 2016. Odd flex but okay.

Wish I could say the same for you.

Several times you mentioned black people getting railroaded and I did think of a good example, the Central Park five. Trump still says they are guilty even though they were cleared on appeal. The justice system prevailed in the end but not before fucking these kids over completely.
How come Trump didn't win any of his appeals?

Clearly he's more guilty than the Central Park five. What kind of slack does Trump cut these kids once they got off? None. He still claims they are guilty.

On one side we have a duly appointed jury, a trial judge, various appeals judges and the entire justice system and on the other side we have Confucamus and Bob Grey.

Even with this silly comparison, you still won't touch the actual evidence. So we're done here. I have my answer.

 

[Deaths Head]

Here is her literally on CNN saying this batshit crazy shit.

You realize the assault took place 30 or so years ago right ? Most women would be spotty if they had the same experience with him I’m sure the other dozen women he sexually assaulted has some type of mental disorder in one form or other .

And what about this ? Trump also filed a motion asking to exclude from evidence the the "Access Hollywood" tape from 2005 in which Trump joked about women letting him sexually assault them because he is "a star."

We get it you support Pete “ O File he’s all over this forum your just one of many backing it on here but you guys are shrinking , just remember garbage don’t stay around to long it stinks up the place and just fades away sooner then later .

 

[idrankyourbeer]

I’ve been saying this for a while. When trump said “I’ll be dating her in 10 years” to a 10 year old on the escalator, the sherchuds in here would have yucked it up with Donny, thinking it was hilarious. Even if it were their daughter.

i wonder how many of molestini cheetolini's ass-eaters on this forum would be willing to leave their own daughters alone with the mandarin molester inside of a bergdorf goodman's?

you know just as long as it bothers a libtard or two i'm sure that there would be a couple.

 

[HomeCheese]

Wish I could say the same for you.


Even with this silly comparison, you still won't touch the actual evidence. So we're done here. I have my answer.

You never provided any reason to doubt the various verdicts. When someone looses a trial and various appeals that is considered proof. It doesn't get any more solid than that.

You don't like the Central Park five comparison so why don't you give me an example of someone you think is innocent even after loosing a trial and various appeals besides Trump.

Trump wasn't even brave enough to testify in his own defense.

Face it, you see life through orange colored glasses.

 

[UFCUCF]

Today the Appeals Court further upheld the $83 Million Judgment against the Sexual Assaulter in Chief.

Pretty gross--we should use our power as a society to discourage deplorable actions like rape and sexual assault. We should not make a person like this President.

Cue the "family values" party to trash the victim and stick up for the assaulter. Make Rape Great Again.

 

[Prutfis]

You never provided any reason to doubt the various verdicts. When someone looses a trial and various appeals that is considered proof. It doesn't get any more solid than that.

You don't like the Central Park five comparison so why don't you give me an example of someone you think is innocent even after loosing a trial and various appeals besides Trump.

Trump wasn't even brave enough to testify in his own defense.

Face it, you see life through orange colored glasses.

Trump on the stand would be a bigger disaster than Alex Jones lawyer sending the entire contents of his phone to the opposition.

 

[heloder]

Trump on the stand would be a bigger disaster than Alex Jones lawyer sending the entire contents of his phone to the opposition.

I forgot about that.

 

[HOLA]

NEW YORK, Sept 8 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Monday refused to throw out an $83.3 million jury verdict against U.S. President Donald Trump for damaging the reputation of the writer E. Jean Carroll in 2019 when he denied her rape claim.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan rejected Trump's argument that the January 2024 verdict should be overturned because he deserved presidential immunity from Carroll's lawsuit.

 

[HARRISON_3]

LAWFARE!!

 

[LeonardoBjj]

NEW YORK, Sept 8 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Monday refused to throw out an $83.3 million jury verdict against U.S. President Donald Trump for damaging the reputation of the writer E. Jean Carroll in 2019 when he denied her rape claim.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan rejected Trump's argument that the January 2024 verdict should be overturned because he deserved presidential immunity from Carroll's lawsuit.

- Come to post that