I haven’t followed your posts ITT closely enough to know which side you’re on in this debate, but that article is a great one that I think proves my point very well. It also links to stats released by the DOJ just a few weeks ago that I think are really interesting, so I’m going to summarize those below because I think everyone should see them. Regarding literal trespassers, it says this:
“Prosecutors also emphasized what they say is their restraint in deciding which defendants to charge. They’ve largely opted against charging people who trespassed on Capitol grounds but didn’t enter the building, and the Justice Department said that discretion has led them to decline about 400 cases presented for potential prosecution by the FBI.”
400 people trespassed, and weren’t even charged let alone locked up for years as is being claimed.
The article also linked to a DOJ site (this link
here) that had some interesting stats.
It says that out of 1583 cases:
- 608 have been charged with assaulting resisting, or impeding law enforcement agents or officers or obstructing those officers
- 180 have been charged with using or carrying a dangerous weapon
- 153 have been charged with destruction or theft of federal property
- 300 or so cases are still pending
Let’s do quick math. If we subtract those numbers above from 1583, that leaves 342 cases which could be our “trespassers” in question. And yet:
1100 people have already completed sentences! They’ve had their cases charged, litigated, convicted, sentenced, and served those sentences already.
This seems to pretty well bust the myth that we’re imprisoning people for years for minor stuff.