Elections Trump Indicted On 91 Counts

[LangfordBarrow]

And even if all of the allegations against hunter were true, that wouldn't absolve Trump from his crimes. It's a stupid whataboutism.

Can't you see that it proves the Deep State has weaponized the DoJ and FBI against Trump and MAGA? Something must be done about this! Democrats must be purged from all agencies so MAGAgrifters can run them to save the country! America First!

 

[Joe]

I dont care about trump says the guy who keeps trying to desperately to make about something else than trump because they dont have a defense

 

[andnowweknow]

I just like seeing who I get a reaction out of. See above.

You're really dunking on everyone brochacho...keep it up..

 

[Joe]

They cutoff trump because they are afraid of another lawsuit lol

 

[panamaican]

They cutoff trump because they are afraid of another lawsuit lol

Now that sounds like something they agreed to when they settled that case. That they would overtly provide factual information rather than spread disinformation as it relates to Trump's claims of election fraud.

 

[sickc0d3r]

Well how could I vote for Trump if he was convicted of a crime .

You going to vote for creepy Joe if he runs?

You’re saying Joe’s imaginary crimes are so imaginarily awful that you’d vote for a guy who’s been federally indicted (by a grand jury, in his home state of FL) for actual crimes. I’d vote third party or not at all in that situation, personally.

But, that’s not really the point. The point is, I first responded to you because you claimed democrats or liberals or “the left” or whatever wouldn’t care if Joe breaks the law. It’s that big ole’ witch hunt, I tells ya. But, in reality, you’re the one willing to give your guy a pass. AKA, you’re full of shit.

 

[AnGrYcRoW]

They need to charge crack baby then see what happens when they squeeze him. Not going to happen unless the Republicans get off their ass and put pressure on.

You need to ask yourself why they haven't already.

 

[AWilder]

You need to ask yourself why they haven't already.

I wouldn't be surprised if hunter gets some kind of indictment. The gun stuff sounded pretty straight forward. But the law works pretty slow and deliberate. Especially for high profile cases with political angles. I doubt trump will see a court room for at least 12 months. More realistically 18-24.

 

[Joe]

You’re saying Joe’s imaginary crimes are so imaginarily awful that you’d vote for a guy who’s been federally indicted (by a grand jury, in his home state of FL) for actual crimes. I’d vote third party or not at all in that situation, personally.

But, that’s not really the point. The point is, I first responded to you because you claimed democrats or liberals or “the left” or whatever wouldn’t care if Joe breaks the law. It’s that big ole’ witch hunt, I tells ya. But, in reality, you’re the one willing to give your guy a pass. AKA, you’re full of shit.

One thing is that the right has no issue lying to their base to rile them up. They have to constantly keep them mad. So when nothing happens. They wont ask were we lied to? No its the system thats crooked and against us. Thats why nothing happened!

 

[SurferH2O]

Hillary? I thought you were griping about Hunter. Which is a pretty solid acquiescence to the point I was making.

As for the Hillary thing, you have the exact same situation -- identifiably criminal behavior vs. identifiably unethical behavior.

You're full of crap and just a Democratic Party shill.

Hillary Clinton dictated to the DOJ that her lawyers (without clearances) would be reviewing Top Secret material to decide what was to be deleted BEFORE she turned it over to the DOJ. Those servers were under Federal Subpoena, which she ignored. Those servers were then hit with Bleach Bit and then turned over. Her IT Staff was given full immunity for some reason.

Hillary Clinton had her staff destroy with hammers 5 phones and devices that were under Federal Subpoena. The staff that destroyed them were given full immunity for some reason.

Instead of being indicted, like Trump, she was give a complete walk by James Comey as he admitted she broke multiple laws.

Hillary was just "unethical". You're ridiculous. Even James Comey stood up in front of a microphone and stated that she broke the laws... and then gave her a full pass.

 

[oldshadow]

You’re saying Joe’s imaginary crimes are so imaginarily awful that you’d vote for a guy who’s been federally indicted (by a grand jury, in his home state of FL) for actual crimes. I’d vote third party or not at all in that situation, personally.

But, that’s not really the point. The point is, I first responded to you because you claimed democrats or liberals or “the left” or whatever wouldn’t care if Joe breaks the law. It’s that big ole’ witch hunt, I tells ya. But, in reality, you’re the one willing to give your guy a pass. AKA, you’re full of shit.

I would vote for about anyone that was running ( if they they have a criminal record they can't run any way) other then what the democrats want for this country. Well unless you guys go out of your mind and run a blue dog democrat then let him pick the platform. Then I would vote for him over Trump.

 

[58miles]

How this thread about Trump getting indicted on 37 counts turn into a BUT HILLARY!!! BUT HUNTER!!! thread?

 

[Mark Hunts FIST]

If you want a target on your back, you might want to follow pretty basic laws.

 

[58miles]

You're full of crap and just a Democratic Party shill.

Hillary Clinton dictated to the DOJ that her lawyers (without clearances) would be reviewing Top Secret material to decide what was to be deleted BEFORE she turned it over to the DOJ. Those servers were under Federal Subpoena, which she ignored. Those servers were then hit with Bleach Bit and then turned over. Her IT Staff was given full immunity for some reason.

Hillary Clinton had her staff destroy with hammers 5 phones and devices that were under Federal Subpoena. The staff that destroyed them were given full immunity for some reason.

Instead of being indicted, like Trump, she was give a complete walk by James Comey as he admitted she broke multiple laws.

Hillary was just "unethical". You're ridiculous.

I have explained this over and over. Get the crack baby and squeeze him and see what comes out. There is plenty to do that and the crack baby was selling influence now to find out if he was lying or if dad was some way in on it.

I will say this very simply so the two deranged rangers will understand If you want whatabout Hillary!!! whatabout Hunter!!! start your own thread but until then stay on topic.

 

[Limbo Pete]

Sure if they have something squeeze away.

That's what she said

 

[oldshadow]

I will say this very simply so the two deranged rangers will understand If you want whatabout Hillary!!! whatabout Hunter!!! start your own thread but until then stay on topic.

It was on topic. I answered a question when asked.

 

[SurferH2O]

I will say this very simply so the two deranged rangers will understand If you want whatabout Hillary!!! whatabout Hunter!!! start your own thread but until then stay on topic.

It's the same topic if you have any critical thinking skills at all. Are you purposefully being myopic? Having a dual Justice System will destroy the nation. Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it's not 100% relavent... and quit being such a coward that you're afraid to discuss the similarities and differences.

We all now why you want to suppress this information, because Democrats get absolutely wrecked when it's brought up and you're a lockstep Democrat. You're either not a smart person or a complete piece of crap that does not want equal protection under the law and equal application of the law.

 

[58miles]

It's the same topic if you have any critical thinking skills at all. Are you purposefully being myopic? Having a dual Justice System will destroy the nation. Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it's not 100% relavent... and quit being such a coward that you're afraid to discuss the similarities and differences.

We all now why you want to suppress this information, because Democrats get absolutely wrecked when it's brought up and you're a lockstep Democrat.

In other words you have absolutely no reasonable defense for your lord and savior. Whatabout is not a defense it a sorry excuse. Btw try using whatabout in a court of law and see how you get. Stay on topic.

 

[SurferH2O]

In other words you have absolutely no reasonable defense for your lord and savior. Whatabout is not a defense it a sorry excuse. Btw try using whatabout in a court of law and see how you get. Stay on topic.

You just made a total idiot of yourself. I don't think much of Trump and I am 100% fine with him being held responsible for any crimes. What I am not 100% alright with is Democrats getting complete walks for the same crimes or worse. You are nothing but a Democratic Party homer that worships Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. You are Left Cult and you now it.

All I am advocating for is equal application of the law and that's not happening and scumbags like you are good with it. You're not intellectually honest or really stupid. I'm not sure which... yet.

 

[58miles]

You just made a total idiot of yourself. I don't think much of Trump and I am 100% fine with him being held responsible for any crimes. What I am not 100% alright with is Democrats getting complete walks for the same crimes or worse. You are nothing but a Democratic Party homer that worships Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. You are Left Cult and you now it.

All I am advocating for is equal application of the law and that's not happening and scumbags like you are good with it. You're not intellectually honest or really stupid. I'm not sure which... yet.

This thread is about Trump, his indictment on 37 counts and the possible 400 years he's facing if convicted along with any possible defenses he may have. If you and the other chuds you want to whine BUT HILLARY!!!, BUT HUNTER!! then start your own thread, don't derail this one.