• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Elections Trump Indicted On 91 Counts

corrupt clown court makes another decision to help out king clown. I can't believe how corrupt the GOP has become. Always pretty shady but now it's just blatant corruption with all these recent scotus rulings.
"I didn't get my way, everyone's corrupt"

It was a hit job, you know it
 
Trump immune from prosecution for official acts.

cope and seethe
LOL did you get those dubs by coping so well?

While I grant this opens up the disingenuous argument over which of his heinous acts are "official acts" and which are not, it won't get rid of all the charges against the convicted felon and big orange turd. But go ahead and keep cheering for a known criminal to get away with crimes. It's a great look with that double wide pissbelt.
 
Trump immune from prosecution for official acts.

cope and seethe

they have to be constitutional valid acts.

No cope needed. The things Trump is charged with aren’t even remotely close to official acts. I imagine that’s what lower courts will rule, and I don’t see how any court could disagree.

The main thing Trump gains from this is time, as I’m sure whatever the lower courts rule will be appealed, and around and around we’ll go again.
 
Not constitutional
It’s closer to being constitutional than what Trump did. The Constitution pretty clearly states that POTUS is commander in chief of the military. The Constitution gives no role to the POTUS, or even the Executive Branch, to the manner in which states run elections, count votes, and certify electors. Trump was just wayyy outside the scope of his presidential duties.

Now, I don’t think a POTUS can, or that Biden will, send a Tomahawk missile into Mar-A-Lago or something. But I do think it’s very irresponsible of SCOTUS to say that a President has immunity for some types of acts but not others—which seems painfully obvious anyway—but not define what constitutes official acts. That just opens the door to all manner of abuses.
 
No cope needed. The things Trump is charged with aren’t even remotely close to official acts. I imagine that’s what lower courts will rule, and I don’t see how any court could disagree.

The main thing Trump gains from this is time, as I’m sure whatever the lower courts rule will be appealed, and around and around we’ll go again.

<36>

Everything he did with regard to these "91 indictments" was constitutional. Regardless, both sides arguing what is and what is not constitutional will tie these ridiculous DOJ-sanctioned election interference cases up for decades.
 
Jack's smith illegal appointment is on the SCOTUS radar as well. This illegal appointment definitely needs to go the the Supreme Court.

lRlTMZb.png
 
Back
Top