- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 67,365
- Reaction score
- 100,549
So we lower rates to zero or near zero. Then we have an actual recession. Now what?
So we lower rates to zero or near zero. Then we have an actual recession. Now what?
@Jack V Savage this reminds me of that Hill editorial.
Low interest rates to recover from a recession = "fed-driven economy"
Negative interest rates at peak of economy = sound economic policy
So Trump on Trump (criticizing the optical effect in the middle of a campaign).
Ah, wake up sheeple. I forgot one.
People like you are the reason this country is falling apart. just bend over, put your head in the sand and take it in the pooper. That about cover it?
Can't fix stupid...too dumb to remember that one huh?
Trump: "They're keeping the rates artificially low so that Obama can go out and play golf after January and say that he did a good job."
Are you still screaming into the void about the fed being illegal? Knock yourself out I guess.
So Trump on Trump (criticizing the optical effect in the middle of a campaign).
I thought you'd have Republicans decrying low interest rates as a matter of actual economic health. As I recall that has never really been their thing.
So Trump on Trump (criticizing the optical effect in the middle of a campaign).
I thought you'd have Republicans decrying low interest rates as a matter of actual economic health. As I recall that has never really been their thing.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ted-cruz-calls-for-monetary-policy-tied-to-gold"But if you look at working men and women, if you look at a single mom buying groceries, she sees hamburger prices have gone nearly 40 percent," he continued. "She sees her cost of electricity going up, her health insurance going up and loose money is one of the major problems, we need sound money."
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/transcript-sixth-republican-top-tier-debate-2016/And this is what we have to -- I -- I've got to tell you, when wages don't rise -- and they haven't for a lot of families for a number of years -- it's very, very difficult for them.
Part of the reason why it hasn't risen because sometimes we're not giving people the skills they need. Sometimes it's because the Federal Reserve kept interest rates so low that the wealthy were able to invest in -- in strong assets like the stock market when everybody else was left behind.
http://archive.jsonline.com/business/109572284.html/"There is nothing more insidious that a government can do to its people than to debase its currency," Ryan said.
Just as harmful, Ryan warns, is that the proliferation of newly printed dollars inevitably unleashes inflation and throws the economy out of kilter in other ways.
"Inflation is a killer of wealth. It wipes out the middle class. It eviscerates the standard of living for people who have retired or are living on fixed incomes," he said. "Name me a nation in history that has prospered by devaluing its currency."
How about any Republicans not named Ted Cruz, John Kasich, Sean Hannity or Paul Ryan?
Cruz is arguing to abolish the Fed, there, not against any specific inflation rate policy. He also represents the wing of libertarian outsiders when he voices that economic strategy (as owed to Paul).
Yeah, this is an example, but this is also an example of why Kasich is regarded as a centrist. He criticizes an artificially low interest rate policy is incentivizing investment for the wealthy, but not necessarily translating into higher wages (despite that the cost of everything is going up anyway).
I'm going to assume that you simply didn't read this link.
WTF are you talking about? I'm not the guy that believed the pathologically lying narcissist and voted for him.Oh yes....you are far too smart to be deceived. People with absolute power and money really love you, they care about you. Greed doesn't exist. Everything they tell you is for your own good. Sleep....sleeeeep.

Agreed, it is devaluing Sweden’s currency compared to the dollar and the euro, while it increases the risk for the housing bubble to burst.It totally contradicts 1) the idea that the economy is very strong now, 2) Trump's previous position, and 3) conservative movement orthodoxy over the past several years. In general, if cutting rates to 0 isn't enough to get the economy moving, going below 0 shouldn't be off the table, but it's not likely to be effective.