- Joined
- Feb 2, 2015
- Messages
- 10,941
- Reaction score
- 4,307
Brock was 106-5 in division 1 college wrestling. That is more than a enough to get a shot in UFC.It's like these dudes forgot about CM Punk and Brock Lesnar lol
Brock was 106-5 in division 1 college wrestling. That is more than a enough to get a shot in UFC.It's like these dudes forgot about CM Punk and Brock Lesnar lol
Not to mention won the title. How can someone be unworthy if they are the best at what they do?Brock was 106-5 in division 1 college wrestling. That is more than a enough to get a shot in UFC.
Winning the title doesn't mean you're the best. Brock Lesnar was never the best heavyweight in MMA, or even the UFC.Not to mention won the title. How can someone be unworthy if they are the best at what they do?
More to do with placing Brock in same category as CM Punk rather than if Brock was the best hw or not. He still wore the symbol and was briefly ranked as the n.1 hw OVER Fedor, Reem, Cain, Werdum etc in fall of 2010. So technically you could say at one moment in time he indeed was the best hw at least in the ufc and everything else is subjective.Winning the title doesn't mean you're the best. Brock Lesnar was never the best heavyweight in MMA, or even the UFC.
The UFC title is controlled by the UFC, meaning its a promotional tool. It's not like you have to literally beat every elite fighter to get the title. Lesnar won the title from someone who shouldn't have even been champion due to inactivity.
Not to mention many people outside the UFC or even at the UFC's 205 division would have beaten Randy Courture at that point.
Brock beat one really good guy in his prime, Frank Mir, and another live contender who didn't fight many guys, Shane Carwin (which he barely won). That isn't evidence to support he was the best HW. Velasquez at the very least was always better.
That's because there has always been a favoritism to ranking the UFC champ as #1 on rankings. That still doesn't mean that he was the best, and there isn't much evidence to support that he really was.More to do with placing Brock in same category as CM Punk rather than if Brock was the best hw or not. He still wore the symbol and was briefly ranked as the n.1 hw OVER Fedor, Reem, Cain, Werdum etc in fall of 2010. So technically you could say at one moment in time he indeed was the best hw at least in the ufc and everything else is subjective.
Oh yeah completly a hyperbole I agreeThat's because there has always been a favoritism to ranking the UFC champ as #1 on rankings. That still doesn't mean that he was the best, and there isn't much evidence to support that he really was.
Comparing CM Punk with him is really silly, that's true. But I think it's still hyperbolic to say Brock was the best.
Does Glory not pay very well? Why are all these kickboxing crossing over to MMA?
Ottoni is just a joke lol pereira was green at mma, the two others could be something dangerousJust looked and Ottoni also hasn't fought in over two years.
Brock was 106-5 in division 1 college wrestling. That is more than a enough to get a shot in UFC.
He's fighting in two weeks to make up for it.
I'm not surprised they passed on Belgaroui. He could be a fun signing for someone like ONE though.2 out of 3 are out (Ottoni and Belgaroui).
Let's see if Vakhitov can make it.