Like I said : "No valid explanation against it."
You have a good night, 7437.
somethign being wasteful is not a valid reason not to do it. what a novel perspective.
Like I said : "No valid explanation against it."
You have a good night, 7437.
The "valid explanation" is that our southern border is not the problem. Our problem is legal ports of entry and visa overstays. Combined with Americans willingly hiring illegals to begin with.
Any money on a physical barrier would be better spent addressing the actual problem points.
I heard Alex Jones secretly really wants to join the NWO but both organizations already have Virgil & Konnan, they don't need another jobber.
Legal port of entrys??
You have 10,000 illegals entering in around the port of entrys..a week.
How is that not an issue?
Fake outageYou know that land is a vast majority private property, right? You want to pull the biggest government heist of citizens’ property in modern politics so we can address the thing that’s NOT the big issue with immigration? That sounds pretty stupid.
Fake outage
Legit belly laughWhich faction of the NWO was set back? I hear the Wolfpac is gaining steam ever since Sting joined.
why not make it 300 miles thick too? that would make tunneling difficult. \
because its a stupid waste.
Actually that is a great answer.Like I said : "No valid explanation against it."
You have a good night, 7437.
Source?
Source?
Hasn't literally every single congressman who has a district on the border, regardless of party, completely disagreed with the entirety of what you are saying?No offense man but judging by your posts you've never spent significant time on the southwest border.
I challenge anyone to spend a month in one of the border towns and tell me theres not an issue.
It's the wild west down there.
Actually that is a great answer.
Its not the argument 'against it' that needs to be made. There is no argument against making it 300 miles thick or driving it a mile below the ground to ensure no one would tunnel under it. that is a true statement.
Does that mean its a prudent and good use of resources, time and money? No. that is the debate that needs to be had, not that simply there is no valid explanation against it.
Why is this wild west atmosphere not reflected in the crime rates in places like for example El Paso?No offense man but judging by your posts you've never spent significant time on the southwest border.
I challenge anyone to spend a month in one of the border towns and tell me theres not an issue.
It's the wild west down there.
California drowns whatever shit state you live in with money in all likelihood. California literally farms better than every po dunk red area or state you've ever been to. You owe California for you not living in a 3rd world shithole if you're from a red state.LOL at California trying to sue Trump over the border wall. When the wall gets built they should stop at California so then all the Mexicans with their drugs and cartels and scum go right into California. They already are the leading sanctuary state for illegals. Give them what they ask for let them drown in them.
LOL at California trying to sue Trump over the border wall. When the wall gets built they should stop at California so then all the Mexicans with their drugs and cartels and scum go right into California. They already are the leading sanctuary state for illegals. Give them what they ask for let them drown in them.