The Greta Thunberg phenomenon and why are the media doing this?

The global warming alarmists are cut from the radical leftist cloth so it's no surprise children are being used to send the message.

They like to brainwash kids and then rally everyone behind "young voters" which are the absolute last people you want influencing your democracy lol.
 
tonni said:
https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/10296/economics/top-co2-polluters-highest-per-capita/
You dumb fuck.
Click to expand...
There are other types of pollution angry man.
+_1f76f3d119609848f5e25baf89691fcc.gif
 
K-Bag said:
There are other types of pollution angry man.
+_1f76f3d119609848f5e25baf89691fcc.gif
Click to expand...
And how are they related to climate change (denial), which is what you were commenting on? I can’t see the image you posted.

Quickly, go try and find something “brown and yellow” people are worse at than Americans
 
tonni said:
And how are they related to climate change (denial), which is what you were commenting on? I can’t see the image you posted.

Quickly, go try and find something “brown and yellow” people are worse at than Americans
Click to expand...
Football.
 
If you made a list of all the things “shoved down our throats” right wingers would die before reading the end of the list.

The list is so long these days I don’t know how they have any room left in their throats.
 
Is that retard still a thing?...I thought her 15 minutes were already over...
 
Tropodan said:
The global warming alarmists are cut from the radical leftist cloth so it's no surprise children are being used to send the message.

They like to brainwash kids and then rally everyone behind "young voters" which are the absolute last people you want influencing your democracy lol.
Click to expand...
When you say " global warming alarmists" are you referring to basically the entire scientific community ?
 
bobgeese said:
Because democrats are emotionally driven, gullible people.
Click to expand...

Is that literally a comment in regards to a discussion where the opposition to Greta only hates her because they don't believe in science and logic and are themselves gullible idiots relying on emotion to deny her claims?

Odd you cant see the irony in calling people who accept scientific consensus the gullible and emotional ones when the opposition got their talking points from the Bible and Fox News.
 
AnGrYcRoW said:
When you say " global warming alarmists" are you referring to basically the entire scientific community ?
Click to expand...

No, I'm referring to a tiny minority of scientists most of which do not specialize in meteorology.

The idea that there is a strong consensus on global warming among scientists is a lie. Rememberber they stopped calling it global warming because there was no evidence? Now, because special needs children scream it on TV we forget that?

There is a reason why you hear "climate change" today.
 
jgarner said:
Is that literally a comment in regards to a discussion where the opposition to Greta only hates her because they don't believe in science and logic and are themselves gullible idiots relying on emotion to deny her claims?

Odd you cant see the irony in calling people who accept scientific consensus the gullible and emotional ones when the opposition got their talking points from the Bible and Fox News.
Click to expand...

The global warming alarmists are not relying on scientific consensus. They are employing the same tactics they use all across the political arena.

They spend most of their energy trying to make things appear like they are correct, instead of pursuing truth.

Special interest groups have funded the larger studies and the larger studies aren't all meteorologists. Their politically motivated scientists.

The evidence shows that our climate is changing and always has been, and hypothesis about rapid temperature rises in the near future are completely made up.
 
KBE6EKCTAH_CCP said:
WTF !!
Europe is spear-heading the fight on climate change so how does your post even make sense?
Do not mistake a handful of American rednecks as representative of "white people".

You Murrcans are seriously obsessed about skin color it's pathological.
Click to expand...

I'm not E Murican
 
Tropodan said:
No, I'm referring to a tiny minority of scientists most of which do not specialize in meteorology.

The idea that there is a strong consensus on global warming among scientists is a lie. Rememberber they stopped calling it global warming because there was no evidence? Now, because special needs children scream it on TV we forget that?

There is a reason why you hear "climate change" today.
Click to expand...
False :
Yes, the vast majority of actively publishing climate scientists – 97 percent – agree that humans are causing global warming and climate change. Most of the leading science organizations around the world have issued public statements expressing this, including international and U.S. science academies, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and a whole host of reputable scientific bodies around the world. A list of these organizations is provided here.

https://climate.nasa.gov/faq/17/do-scientists-agree-on-climate-change/
 
Tropodan said:
The global warming alarmists are not relying on scientific consensus. They are employing the same tactics they use all across the political arena.

They spend most of their energy trying to make things appear like they are correct, instead of pursuing truth.

Special interest groups have funded the larger studies and the larger studies aren't all meteorologists. Their politically motivated scientists.

The evidence shows that our climate is changing and always has been, and hypothesis about rapid temperature rises in the near future are completely made up.
Click to expand...

Except being completely wrong about all those points, you might have had something reasonable to say.

There is no major respected scientific organization studying climate models that doesn't accept human caused global climate change as a reality of our planet. You don't think climate scientists know about this crazy concept that the climate has been changing? You don't think they take that into account with their data and models? You, jackass #10 on the internet can figure that complicated concept of a changing environment over time out, but literal scientists aren't smart enough to compensate for that fact?

Since the industrial revolution there has been a sharp increase in the temperature globally that is perfectly accounted for by the yearly tonnage of carbon put out by humans. What the trend line should be without human influence is one thing that they know. Where it actually trends yearly and the difference between the two is something that we can verify with the data.

And only one side is politically motivated? Why the fuck would scientists care one way or another what policy dictates on climate change? They get paid to do science, not promote bullshit. Scientists submit peer reviewed papers globally and they all support climate change. Even companies like Exxon mobile accept climate change as a fact. Even the Department of Defense is investing in preparing for human caused climate change issues.

The only people who don't accept this reality are delusional douchebags who want hand pick what science they choose to believe or not believe based on nothing more than a personal feeling.

You can find a minor dissenting view on literally anything. I can find an idiot percentage of people who don't accept the world is round. That doesn't give it credibility. That's the same nonsense you're pulling with climate change. You're pointing to the idiot exceptions to the community as a valid reason to ignore the 97%.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

nhbbear
Social The hypocrisy of climate change activists.
8 9 10
Replies
194
Views
5K
mon
mon

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,237,098
Messages
55,467,445
Members
174,786
Latest member
plasterby

Share this page

Back
Top