Star Wars Megathread

[Myrddin Wild]

For the people posting ITT, outside Star Wars, who/what are your favourite:

Sci Fi movies
Directors
Sci fi related comics
books
writers
artists
games

I’m just wondering the gamut of people’s tastes

Don't forget to share yourz bro

Sci Fi movies - I'm just as big of a Matrix fan as I am Star Wars.
Directors - Guy Ritchie, Stallone
Sci fi related comics - I only read SW's comics
books - I like informative books about health, Finance, metaphysics, psychology etc...
writers - Stuart Wilde
artists - George Redhawk & M.C. Escher sticks out of the pack for me.
games - The New Tetris, Motorstorm, Super Star Dust, Oblivion Elder Scrolls are some of the last games I really spent some time on, but I had to give it up due to the time it takes away from other things (ie... 400 hrs at least on Elder Scrolls.)

George Redhawk

Here's a shoop I did of a RedHawk art

 

[The Elemental O]

The Drinker has spoken.

More like, The Girl Who Kept Putting Her Foot In Her Mouth On Social Media

What is clear is that Gina liked to post stupid and potentially offensive stuff as well as misinformation about the pandemic, which was potentially dangerous. People called her out on her bullshit. Disney told her to stop. She refused to stop. She doubled down with a clumsy holocaust meme. Now she is out of a job. Let's not treat her like an innocent victim or martyr, she was simply a moron who believed being an anti-masker was a political belief and Disney obviously tried to protect her giving her warnings and being a cold blooded business like Disney, "3 strikes and you're out".

 

[GearSolidMetal]

More like, The Girl Who Kept Putting Her Foot In Her Mouth On Social Media

More like The Girl Who Was Constantly Harrassed On Social Media, Was Told To Not Defend Herself, And Defended Herself..

If there's anything we've learned from this snowflake culture its snowflakes will say they're 'offended' by anything. "Oh Gina posted something about questioning the effectiveness of masks! Fire her!" Or "Oh she posted how propaganda brainwashed Germany into hating Jews! Cancel her!"

Meanwhile, other Disney actors and employees have posted far worse social media posts, and not only have they been not fired, they've been promoted.

Don't bullshit us, Gina Carano was fired for posting things the Disney Execs disagreed with. Period.

 

[Crawler89]

Oh for fucks sake I hate all you cunts who have to be team va team b, usually right vs left.

First things first. Who owns most the media and bullshit despite "its the leftist media" unless you've been living under a rock assholes like Rupert Murdoch aint exactly left wing.

Second. She got told to stop with the idiot comments and memes by her contracted employer. She didn't. The fuck you expect

Third. She compared being anti vax to the holocaust. So here we have a) an anti science idiot using science to post her shit b) a fucking moron trying to compare being a fucking moron to the fucking holocaust.

What do you expect to happen. Oh no free speech. Sure have free speech. But if your gonna be a fucking anti facts, science, realist idiot then fuck off and die.

Doesn't matter if your leftie or rightie.

Its called common sense and decency.

Also why is it always fucking rich white people bitching about how there persecuted. Oh your being lead to the ovens bro.

Anyway.

I read high republic issue 2. Fun and a bit silly but I liked the intro of the nihil.

 

[Thrawn33]

Please keep the Gina firing shitshow in the Mando thread or the War Room.

We're talking Star Wars here..and the topic is already all over the forum for you to pick sides.

(This is directed at everyone)

 

[Proud American]

Oh for fucks sake I hate all you cunts who have to be team va team b, usually right vs left.

First things first. Who owns most the media and bullshit despite "its the leftist media" unless you've been living under a rock assholes like Rupert Murdoch aint exactly left wing.

Second. She got told to stop with the idiot comments and memes by her contracted employer. She didn't. The fuck you expect

Third. She compared being anti vax to the holocaust. So here we have a) an anti science idiot using science to post her shit b) a fucking moron trying to compare being a fucking moron to the fucking holocaust.

What do you expect to happen. Oh no free speech. Sure have free speech. But if your gonna be a fucking anti facts, science, realist idiot then fuck off and die.

Doesn't matter if your leftie or rightie.

Its called common sense and decency.

Also why is it always fucking rich white people bitching about how there persecuted. Oh your being lead to the ovens bro.

Anyway.

I read high republic issue 2. Fun and a bit silly but I liked the intro of the nihil.

Does Disney pay you to polish their boots?

And most media is not run by “right wingers” lol. About zero. It’s all run by left wing neoliberal globalists.

and she didn’t compare anything to the Holocaust. She just said people are being indoctrinated to hate their neighbors, and she’s right.

 

[Proud American]

Please keep the Gina firing shitshow in the Mando thread or the War Room.

We're talking Star Wars here..and the topic is already all over the forum for you to pick sides.

(This is directed at everyone)

Sorry. Dipping out. I don’t watch the new shows and won’t.

 

[FyrFytr998]

@Aegon Spengler

I guess for artists I meant visual but if there’s a sci-fi music scene I’m interested! John Byrne, Arthur Adams, John Romita jr.

Out of those movies, just for me personally, I like Alien 1 and 2. There are good scenes and moments in the rest of them but I don’t like them as whole movies. Agreed

I love both Judge Dredd movies. They are both action-comedy at its finest imo. I know the second one is kind of sad and serious but it’s also very darkly comical to me Agreed, Stallone’s Dredd gets too much shit. It was good.

For Trek, I go all in for all the original movies, even the first one and the one with the giant head at the centre of the galaxy. “What does GOD need with a starship??? You’re not our buddy guy”

I like first contact and generations but the next two piss me off

For directors: If you could pick between Jar Jar Abrams and R. Johnson who do you go with? JJ, Every time I see RJ, I want to punch him in the face.

For games I have heard of Hearthstone. You ever do Starcraft? Nah, I used to be big into Guild Wars as well.

 

[Deleted member 110072]

I think your pov is... "<45>"
...and I think it's disrespectful to mock me like that.

You obviously see that it was when Vader talked about putting his sister in danger (in ep. 6 in the emperor's chamber...) that Luke SNAPPED... yet you continue to tell me I'm wrong about that. That's called a "paradox." Your alternate agenda in creating that paradox is because you hate The Last Jedi & you don't want to admit that Luke just snapped in the moment when he saw his loved ones dying & being in pain due to Kylo's actions.

You reduced that scene down to "Luke wanting to kill Kylo because of a feeling he had." That's when I quoted you for the first time & said you were exaggerating. I showed you proof from the movie that it had been an ongoing thing & that it was in fact much more than a feeling he got in the moment. Now you're just sticking to those guns & trying to mock me about something that's clearly in the movie.

Odd that you deny it since his dialog during that scene says that he was triggered & snapped in that moment. You can even hear Luke's loved ones screaming in the background due to the pain Kylo will cause them. So it's strange that you give me that rolling smiley face emoji to mock me for saying something accurate.

....& I'm going to answer your last post to me at some point this weekend. I've been working & away from the computer so I haven't had time.

At a quick glance I have to say that you & me having a conversation isn't working out. After you reduced Luke pulling the saber on Kylo to "a feeling" he had in the moment... I literally have said at least a half dozen times to you "It's all in the movie" that this has been on going prior to this & that it was more than just a feeling. I even dictated the scenes that prove it was more than just a feeling he got that night. In the very post you quoted I said "It's all in the movie." So what was your take away? "So you're saying that I need to read the novel to understand it all?"





I don't know how to reason with someone who twists things like that... & it's all just so you won't have to admit that you exaggerated. You exaggerated. Just admit it & let it go.

There's no debate as to whether it spells out exactly in the movie that Luke had seen Kylo going dark prior to that night. There's no debate that he snapped. I dictated in the movie from 2 different scenes that verify that. So you could never make the point that someone has to read the novel in order to understand that. What you're doing now is just shifting away from admitting that you had that a little wrong. It's okay... try saying it. I do it all the time in these threads when I feel like I've mis-represented something. It will be an incredible weight off your shoulders to quit beating this dead horse you insist on continuing.

There's not a single person on earth who hasn't made a mistake. Join the rest of us & quit trying to pretend like you're perfect & never fuck up.

Sorry but you really are far too intolerant of other peoples opinions here and prone to taking offence, that was just a jokey use of a smiley and you jump down my throat again and respond with another massively long winded post which doesnt even make any refference to my post.

I don't see any point in responding to you because you don't pay any attension to those responses, not even the relatively short one highlighting how Luke's breaking in ROTJ is built up, you just post the same thing again and again, in this case falling back to the same semetic arguement again and again even though I made my position far clearer than that.

 

[FyrFytr998]

This sums up all discussion about the ST. If you like them cool. If you don't, just stop acknowledging their existence in media. I mean it'll be hard to ignore all the clearance bins filled with ST crap at the stores, but you know what I mean.


I've come to this conclusion thinking about the Star Trek thread where I happen to love the Jar Jar reboots, but realize there might be some hard core Trekkies that hate them. No sense chasing my tail trying to convince people who are incapable of having their minds changed.

Gonna take it day by day. If F&F can't overcome the SJW leftist crap with quality content, I'll move on from SW. If they can, just maybe Disney can convince me to put my hard earned money back into their service.

 

[Myrddin Wild]

Sorry but you really are far too intolerant of other peoples opinions here and prone to taking offence, that was just a jokey use of a smiley and you jump down my throat again and respond with another massively long winded post which doesnt even make any refference to my post.

I don't see any point in responding to you because you don't pay any attension to those responses, not even the relatively short one highlighting how Luke's breaking in ROTJ is built up, you just post the same thing again and again, in this case falling back to the same semetic arguement again and again even though I made my position far clearer than that.

1. I'm very understanding of other people's opinions & I concede all the time unlike you who has to be right about everything no matter what.
   
2. It's very hypocritical for someone who makes a lot of long posts to insult me for mine.
3. Make up your mind, do I not pay attention to your pov, or are my posts too long because I give you a detailed response. Your own words are a paradox.
4. You don't see any point in responding to me & yet you did. There's another paradox
   
5. Is it all in the movie or isn't it? Spoiler, you already acknowledged that it is, despite mocking me in your previous post with some nonsense about how I think you need to read the novel to understand the movie.

It's not surprising that you mock me with that smiley & then play the innocent card. Quite often the bully doesn't consider himself the bully. To him it's just "jokey"... to use your words.



Despite them saying they were just joking... they were in fact being mean to him on purpose.

 

[Myrddin Wild]

Theory put out a pretty cool vid here about the lightsaber switch after Luke dropped his hand He also gives a nice tribute to George Lucas' writing at the end that is a good reminder of how deeply he thought about everything in this world he created that we all love.

 

[lifelessheap]

I love these...

 

[FyrFytr998]

 

[Deleted member 110072]

1. I'm very understanding of other people's opinions & I concede all the time unlike you who has to be right about everything no matter what.
   
2. It's very hypocritical for someone who makes a lot of long posts to insult me for mine.
3. Make up your mind, do I not pay attention to your pov, or are my posts too long because I give you a detailed response. Your own words are a paradox.
4. You don't see any point in responding to me & yet you did. There's another paradox
   
5. Is it all in the movie or isn't it? Spoiler, you already acknowledged that it is, despite mocking me in your previous post with some nonsense about how I think you need to read the novel to understand the movie.

It's not surprising that you mock me with that smiley & then play the innocent card. Quite often the bully doesn't consider himself the bully. To him it's just "jokey"... to use your words.



Despite them saying they were just joking... they were in fact being mean to him on purpose.

Ask yourself this, which of us ends up in repeated aggressive exchanges with multiple different posters in this thread?

You can absolutely ignore someones arguement and still come up with a very long winded post, indeed I think its a classic form of dishonest arguement on the net which you use repeatedly in this thread/s for years on end.

As I said I think its pointless to carry on any discussion with you, it takes vast amounts of time due to the above and it never goes anywhere, no real responses to any point I make and you making the same point post after post.

 

[Cool Hand Luke]

Ask yourself this, which of us ends up in repeated aggressive exchanges with multiple different posters in this thread?

You can absolutely ignore someones arguement and still come up with a very long winded post, indeed I think its a classic form of dishonest arguement on the net which you use repeatedly in this thread/s for years on end.

As I said I think its pointless to carry on any discussion with you, it takes vast amounts of time due to the above and it never goes anywhere, no real responses to any point I make and you making the same point post after post.

his e-cardio is something to be amazed at but it's true, his smoke and mirrors approach to discussing anything causes more arguments than it solves

 

[Deleted member 110072]

his e-cardio is something to be amazed at but it's true, his smoke and mirrors approach to discussing anything causes more arguments than it solves

The act of trying to win argument by shear volumne of posting and willingness to keep restating variations on the same thing many many times is pretty common on the net.

Ultimately though he was the one challanging me, had a go at a short statement I made which I clarified and then he's never really responded to the clarification just happily restated his same semantic argument again and again, seems less interested in discussion and more interested in attacking someone with a view he disagrees with however much he claims to be tolerant of them.

I'v not posted much there in the past year or more but honestly I found the same thing on the Jedi Council Forum for years talking about faults in the prequels and the sequels, not just that style of argument but it seemed like we werent even talking about the same thing. The difference between discussing an actual film and between the kind of head canon some people had built up. I mean fine if you want look at film that way nothing wrong with it but expecting others to do the same is pushing it for me.

The point about ROTJ and the difference in Luke "snapping" is I think a good and honest one, how much time and skill that film invests in building up to that moment compared to TLJ rather than simply "Leia being his weakness".. The difference between simply stating a characters motivation and building drama effectivenly on screen.

 

[Myrddin Wild]

You can absolutely ignore someones arguement and still come up with a very long winded post, indeed I think its a classic form of dishonest arguement on the net which you use repeatedly in this thread/s for years on end.

I'm not aware of anything I haven't addressed. You seem to be of the mind my posts are too long & detailed, yet you can't be bothered to tell me what exactly it is I'm not addressing.

As I said I think its pointless to carry on any discussion with you, it takes vast amounts of time due to the above and it never goes anywhere, no real responses to any point I make and you making the same point post after post.

Here it is nice & simple:

1. You said Luke attacked Kylo based off a feeling.
   
2. I said it was ongoing prior to that night.
3. You said "was that in the movie"
4. I dictated exactly from the movie where it says that.

How is that not addressing your concern?
You said, "well I wanted them to build up to it more."

However that doesn't change the fact that it is in the movie. It's simply YOUR OPINION. & that's fine, but you won't admit that. You tried to make it out like I was telling you it's necessary to read the novel. Go back & read your posts... it's all documented.

Lets finish this right now. Is it or is it not in the movie? (#2 above) This is a very simple question I've asked you multiple times that you keep avoiding.

 

[Myrddin Wild]

Ask yourself this, which of us ends up in repeated aggressive exchanges with multiple different posters in this thread?

You mean like this:

moreorless87 said: ↑
Honestly a lot of the debate just strikes me as either people being driven by politics or just blindly defending the Starwars brand​

You don't consider those insults? Your reducing my pov to being null of content & only being presented due to a political stand or blindly defending SW's.

Here's a nice convenient list of things you haters have said to others. Not all were said to me, but I personalized it to make the point.

@C-H-L (aka @Cool Hand Luke) @GearSolidMetal @Mcountry @StoneColdSteveAustin @morningstar @FyrFytr998 @moreorless87 @Phisher

All of these things were said from the card carrying SW's resistance listed above...who have said these hard things to the support.

1. I'm a movie fascist
2. I'm a bitch
3. I'm a bigot
   
4. I lack taste
5. I'm toxic
   
6. I have low standards
7. I'm pathetic
8. nobody cares about my interpretation
9. I'm a twit
10. I'm a Stan (per the eminem song I found out)
11. I'm a little kid
    
12. I'm a SJW
13. I'm a box that needs checked
14. I'm claiming victim status
    
15. my pov that the movies are good, is wrong
16. I got no critical thinking
17. my information isn't jack shit
18. I just parrot Disney PR
    
19. I'm only in it for a moral & social victory
20. I couldn't be a long term fan if I like those movies.
21. My opinion is wrong
22. My communication is all smoke & mirrors
23. I'm a Sensitive Nancy

#22 he posted while I was writting this!!! #23 is the response just after this post. Yet I'm the only one "being aggressive?" Teh fook? #22 is from a hater who constantly harrasses me even though I rarely tag him. @Cool Hand Luke has been riding my ass for 3 fucking years, including hijacking my celebration thread that took me a week to prepare for with live content being moved to the op, getting the schedule... & we even had a guy in attendance that I was posting news & pictures from live. He came in & shit on everything & drove everyone out Oh but I'm the bad guy right?

it's true, his smoke and mirrors approach to discussing anything causes more arguments than it solves

C-H-L said: ↑
@Myrddin Wild and @A.A. Riggs are the perfect movie fascists

C-H-L said: ↑
to say that myrddin was 'simply asking for politeness' is untrue. time and time again, if someone comes in with a differing opinion, he is the one who ramps it up all while claiming victim status when someone responds in kind.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
quit being a little bitch about it.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
Its one thing to know when you're beat and keep on fighting anyway, but jesus christ man stop acting like such a bitch.

Mcountry said: ↑
Are you the same twit who relentlessly defended the last jedi?

Mcountry said: ↑
only a bleeding heart sjw would have defended that crap to the bitter end.

StoneColdSteveAustin said: ↑
the OT is “great” the sequels aren’t even close to them. So how can you label the ST as “great.” because like a little kid you use the word too loosely.

FyrFytr998 said: ↑
These Stans are happy with moral and social victories.

StoneColdSteveAustin said: ↑
No long time fans like that shit.

& this was just skimming the top of a 30 day old thread.

The resistance has been attacking the support for 3 fooking years. So it's pretty fooking rich for you to now try & turn it on me like I'm the problem.

You making me the bad guy is like the criminals calling the cops.

...and how about you & the others who just spit venom at SW's day in & day out. This thread isn't called "The SW's hater's circle jerk." This isn't your place to come in & get your hater fix on. That's what the OT is for. This is a place to have decent convos, & if you weren't so busy trying to prove me wrong, you'd see that I typically only get into these convos with people who insult me first. (one acceptation aside which I publicly apologized for) You just don't like that someone's standing up against your harrassment & constant venom spitting at SW's.

This first one was a response to a timid person who kindly asked for permission to say he liked the sequels.

Mcountry said: ↑
You are allowed to have an opinion. Even one that's wrong. The sequels are dog shit to a large enough chunk of the star wars fan base that they were bad calls.

That poor fellow hasn't been back since. You & your cronies always gang up on them & that's why there's more of you in these threads. People who love things just don't typically want to deal with your hatred & harassment.

Here's some of your personal work:

​

You & all the others who spit this stuff daily are a toxic influence on this thread.

Spoiler

moreorless87 said: ↑
I think the reality is both the prequels and sequels are actually massive fuck ups.

moreorless87 said: ↑
look at all the laughably bad shit around the Holdo plo

moreorless87 said: ↑
I think you can see the intention though was that any criticism could be characterized as born of bigotry, just how swifty we saw this with The Last Jedi were the "toxic fanbase" line was being brought up in the media within a day of release I think was a real giveaway.

moreorless87 said: ↑
The sequels were really just a mess on every level IMHO, no well thought out drama or story, zero respect for the franchise tossing achievements and character advancement from the originals in the trash and honestly simply a lack of talent.

moreorless87 said: ↑
time is revealing these are just VERY bad films, confused, bland, silly messes of blockbusters that would have flopped massively without the Starwars brand.

moreorless87 said: ↑
They are the very definition of "turn your brain off" cinema for me, just a rapid fire tide of non special plotting, nostalgia, comedy and unearnt atempts at drama thrown at your face at 1000 mph. JJ Abrams should be designing theme park rides not making films.

moreorless87 said: ↑
I think his films are a fucking mess of confused underdeveloped plots full of bad comedy and cheap nostalgia which don't respect the originals at all. The Force Awakens throws pretty much every achievement of the OT in the trash, resets everything including Han's character so Abrams can do his cheap nostalgia formula.

A lot of the worst aspects of The Last Jedi follow his style as well, the whole Finn/Rose/Poe plot is full of terrible cartoonish zinger "comedy" and mawkish unearned drama. Even without the way it treated Luke it would not have been anything close to a good film for me

moreorless87 said: ↑
I wouldnt want Abrams anywhere close to any franchise I care about, the mans a hack IMHO and everything her touches turns to shite recently

moreorless87 said: ↑
his disrespect for the franchise. Rey as a Mary Sue like character defined by being better than the existing characters and a tendancy to erase the achievements seen in the franchise plot previously.
moreorless87 said: ↑
I believe there intention was probably to play up some negative reaction from conservatives as a marketing tool.

moreorless87 said: ↑
The "story group" to me generally gave the appearance of a load of media studies collage grads trying to bullshit their way into a creative career.

Here's some more from your gang who infect these threads daily with hatred. You know if you hate it so much, then split. Do something you love. Talk about something you love. This insatiable need to spit venom at SW's isn't healthy for you... & it certainly isn't healthy for us to have to listen to daily.

Spoiler

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
Everything she's directly associated with in development has been shit.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
absolutely shitty scripts for all three sequel movies.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
a cancer that almost killed it.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
Kathleen Kennedy - "We didn't have any source material!" Shut Up Bitch.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
a forgetable shit film that triggers the idealogical opponents.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
the first mistake Bob Igur made was hiring Kathleen Kennedy.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
Don't get me started on TLJ. I'd be here typing all day about that shit film.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
Oh sure, alienating and insulting over half your fanbase was a great marketing tool. Brilliant

StoneColdSteveAustin said: ↑
The movies are so bad even the dude who plays luke hates them and so does the rest of the cast

StoneColdSteveAustin said: ↑
Every actor hates the sequels and wants nothing to do with them again. That tells you a lot

StoneColdSteveAustin said: ↑
No long time fans like Lukes portrayal in the sequel trilogy.
Hmm... funny, I like em & I thought maybe 40 years of fandom made me a long term fan.

Morning Star said: ↑
Pablo is a complete asshole. The guy is so bitter everything that he had a part in was hated

Morning Star said: ↑
Can't wait till Kathleen Kennedy is gone. Everything she touches goes to shit. I just think she's power hungry but has zero vision and leadership ability. She's a fraud and is desperately clinging for power. If she had a dick she would have been fired already.

Lovestorm said: ↑
That guy was like the P4P fart sniffer. I hope he got zapped by Sidious when he outlived his usefulness.

Mcountry said: ↑
Oh I can't wait to not watch a fucking thing that ugly bitch is a part of!

fungi said: ↑
What a steaming pile of dogshit!

Crash Lance said: ↑
everything that Kathleen Kennedy touches transforms into feces. So far, the Walt Disney Corporation era of Star Wars has been nothing but FECES.

Mcountry said: ↑
That stupid bitch is worth 300 m? She has barely enough braincells to make coffee ffs.
300m to guide your sure shot franchise into a steamy pile of shit, until she was bailed out by two straight white men.

Phisher said: ↑
Kennedy and the idiots that she hired have cost Disney far more money than any bad press for getting rid of her would.

The fact that Hollywood has let the corrupt trade publications and Twitter distort the reality about what the general public actually wants boggles the mind.

Phisher said: ↑
Every Star Wars movie that she had direct control over had chaotic production and multiple reshoots, except TLJ, where she let Rian Johnson destroy the canon without supervision.

Phisher said: ↑
She has no business whatsoever running a studio. By this point, it should be obvious to anybody with a functioning brain that she didn't have anything whatsoever to do with creative on most of the iconic movies that she had producers credits on. Lucas must kick himself every day for handpicking her to preserve the franchise.

Phisher said: ↑
There's a big group of people from the top down in that company who hate old Star Wars and its fanbase.

It's every day with this stuff for these people​

 

[Mcountry]

You mean like this:

moreorless87 said: ↑
Honestly a lot of the debate just strikes me as either people being driven by politics or just blindly defending the Starwars brand​

You don't consider those insults? Your reducing my pov to being null of content & only being presented due to a political stand or blindly defending SW's.

Here's a nice convenient list of things you haters have said to others. Not all were said to me, but I personalized it to make the point.

@C-H-L (aka @Cool Hand Luke) @GearSolidMetal @Mcountry @StoneColdSteveAustin @morningstar @FyrFytr998 @moreorless87 @Phisher

All of these things were said from the card carrying SW's resistance listed above...who have said these hard things to the support.

1. I'm a movie fascist
2. I'm a bitch
3. I'm a bigot
   
4. I lack taste
5. I'm toxic
   
6. I have low standards
7. I'm pathetic
8. nobody cares about my interpretation
9. I'm a twit
10. I'm a Stan (per the eminem song I found out)
11. I'm a little kid
    
12. I'm a SJW
13. I'm a box that needs checked
14. I'm claiming victim status
    
15. my pov that the movies are good, is wrong
16. I got no critical thinking
17. my information isn't jack shit
18. I just parrot Disney PR
    
19. I'm only in it for a moral & social victory
20. I couldn't be a long term fan if I like those movies.
21. My opinion is wrong
22. My communication is all smoke & mirrors

That last one is just a post or 2 above that he posted while I was writting this!!! It's from a hater who constantly harrasses me even though I rarely tag him. @Cool Hand Luke has been riding my ass for 3 fucking years, including hijacking my celebration thread that took me a week to prepare for with live content being moved to the op, getting the schedule... & we even had a guy in attendance that I was posting news & pictures from live. He came in & shit on everything & drove everyone out Oh but I'm the bad guy right?




You making me the bad guy is like the criminals calling the cops.

...and how about you & the others who just spit venom at SW's day in & day out. This thread isn't called "The SW's hater's circle jerk." This isn't your place to come in & get your hater fix on. That's what the OT is for. This is a place to have decent convos, & if you weren't so busy trying to prove me wrong, you'd see that I typically only get into these convos with people who insult me first. (one acceptation aside which I publicly apologized for) You just don't like that someone's standing up against your harrassment & constant venom spitting at SW's.

This first one was a response to a timid person who kindly asked for permission to say he liked the sequels.

Mcountry said: ↑
You are allowed to have an opinion. Even one that's wrong. The sequels are dog shit to a large enough chunk of the star wars fan base that they were bad calls.

That poor fellow hasn't been back since. You & your cronies always gang up on them & that's why there's more of you in these threads. People who love things just don't typically want to deal with your hatred & harassment.

Here's some of your personal work:
You & all the others who spit this stuff daily are a toxic influence on this thread.

Spoiler

moreorless87 said: ↑
I think the reality is both the prequels and sequels are actually massive fuck ups.

moreorless87 said: ↑
look at all the laughably bad shit around the Holdo plo

moreorless87 said: ↑
I think you can see the intention though was that any criticism could be characterized as born of bigotry, just how swifty we saw this with The Last Jedi were the "toxic fanbase" line was being brought up in the media within a day of release I think was a real giveaway.

moreorless87 said: ↑
The sequels were really just a mess on every level IMHO, no well thought out drama or story, zero respect for the franchise tossing achievements and character advancement from the originals in the trash and honestly simply a lack of talent.

moreorless87 said: ↑
time is revealing these are just VERY bad films, confused, bland, silly messes of blockbusters that would have flopped massively without the Starwars brand.

moreorless87 said: ↑
They are the very definition of "turn your brain off" cinema for me, just a rapid fire tide of non special plotting, nostalgia, comedy and unearnt atempts at drama thrown at your face at 1000 mph. JJ Abrams should be designing theme park rides not making films.

moreorless87 said: ↑
I think his films are a fucking mess of confused underdeveloped plots full of bad comedy and cheap nostalgia which don't respect the originals at all. The Force Awakens throws pretty much every achievement of the OT in the trash, resets everything including Han's character so Abrams can do his cheap nostalgia formula.

A lot of the worst aspects of The Last Jedi follow his style as well, the whole Finn/Rose/Poe plot is full of terrible cartoonish zinger "comedy" and mawkish unearned drama. Even without the way it treated Luke it would not have been anything close to a good film for me

moreorless87 said: ↑
I wouldnt want Abrams anywhere close to any franchise I care about, the mans a hack IMHO and everything her touches turns to shite recently

moreorless87 said: ↑
his disrespect for the franchise. Rey as a Mary Sue like character defined by being better than the existing characters and a tendancy to erase the achievements seen in the franchise plot previously.
moreorless87 said: ↑
I believe there intention was probably to play up some negative reaction from conservatives as a marketing tool.

moreorless87 said: ↑
The "story group" to me generally gave the appearance of a load of media studies collage grads trying to bullshit their way into a creative career.

Here's some more from your gang who infect these threads daily with hatred. You know if you hate it so much, then split. Do something you love. Talk about something you love. This insatiable need to spit venom at SW's isn't healthy for you... & it certainly isn't healthy for us to have to listen to daily.

Spoiler

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
Everything she's directly associated with in development has been shit.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
absolutely shitty scripts for all three sequel movies.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
a cancer that almost killed it.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
Kathleen Kennedy - "We didn't have any source material!" Shut Up Bitch.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
a forgetable shit film that triggers the idealogical opponents.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
the first mistake Bob Igur made was hiring Kathleen Kennedy.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
Don't get me started on TLJ. I'd be here typing all day about that shit film.

GearSolidMetal said: ↑
Oh sure, alienating and insulting over half your fanbase was a great marketing tool. Brilliant

StoneColdSteveAustin said: ↑
The movies are so bad even the dude who plays luke hates them and so does the rest of the cast

StoneColdSteveAustin said: ↑
Every actor hates the sequels and wants nothing to do with them again. That tells you a lot

StoneColdSteveAustin said: ↑
No long time fans like Lukes portrayal in the sequel trilogy.
Hmm... funny, I like em & I thought maybe 40 years of fandom made me a long term fan.

Morning Star said: ↑
Pablo is a complete asshole. The guy is so bitter everything that he had a part in was hated

Morning Star said: ↑
Can't wait till Kathleen Kennedy is gone. Everything she touches goes to shit. I just think she's power hungry but has zero vision and leadership ability. She's a fraud and is desperately clinging for power. If she had a dick she would have been fired already.

Lovestorm said: ↑
That guy was like the P4P fart sniffer. I hope he got zapped by Sidious when he outlived his usefulness.

Mcountry said: ↑
Oh I can't wait to not watch a fucking thing that ugly bitch is a part of!

fungi said: ↑
What a steaming pile of dogshit!

Crash Lance said: ↑
everything that Kathleen Kennedy touches transforms into feces. So far, the Walt Disney Corporation era of Star Wars has been nothing but FECES.

Mcountry said: ↑
That stupid bitch is worth 300 m? She has barely enough braincells to make coffee ffs.
300m to guide your sure shot franchise into a steamy pile of shit, until she was bailed out by two straight white men.

Phisher said: ↑
Kennedy and the idiots that she hired have cost Disney far more money than any bad press for getting rid of her would.

The fact that Hollywood has let the corrupt trade publications and Twitter distort the reality about what the general public actually wants boggles the mind.

Phisher said: ↑
Every Star Wars movie that she had direct control over had chaotic production and multiple reshoots, except TLJ, where she let Rian Johnson destroy the canon without supervision.

Phisher said: ↑
She has no business whatsoever running a studio. By this point, it should be obvious to anybody with a functioning brain that she didn't have anything whatsoever to do with creative on most of the iconic movies that she had producers credits on. Lucas must kick himself every day for handpicking her to preserve the franchise.

Phisher said: ↑
There's a big group of people from the top down in that company who hate old Star Wars and its fanbase.

Holy shit you can add sensitive Nancy to the list because you are one.

The movies were dog shit. They were bad ideas that have now ended in dead ends and cancelations. Their main purpose was to INCREASE merch sales, instead they've decreased merch sales. Basically everything that the producers had set out to do, they failed at doing. They tore their audience apart. What fucking good has resulted from these 3 movies?

Can you like em? Sure. Were they bad ideas? Yup.