- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 62,657
- Reaction score
- 44,800
Raising minimum wage means you will not get 40 hours a week, this isn't hard to understand.
Glad to see I was spot on.
You haven't had a hard day of work in your life kid.
Raising minimum wage means you will not get 40 hours a week, this isn't hard to understand.
I lean more toward the right, but not on this issue. I believe the left shares blame here too. The left believe in taxing more & wasting more tax money. That same money could be left on the table for businesses to spend on their employees instead of giving it the government to blow.This is one of the most disgusting things I see coming from righties like @TheStruggle
Like someone who works 40+hrs at a burger joint doesn't deserve to also to able to afford to eat at the burger joint.
They have a incredibly condescending attitude toward the working poor that serve them food every day.
It makes me think people like @TheStruggle haven't had a hard day of work in their life.
It's like they enjoy having a lower class to shit on and make themselves feel better.
Just shut up already... My point is the government trying to control too much.. But I wasn't talking to your dumb ass anyway.Wow, way to show everyone you don't know what you're talking about yet again.
A city setting a minimum wage has no effect on the size of the federal government.
I lean more toward the right, but not on this issue. I believe the left shares blame here too. The left believe in taxing more & wasting more tax money. That same money could be left on the table for businesses to spend on their employees instead of giving it the government to blow.
Just shut up already... My point is the government trying to control too much.. But I wasn't talking to your dumb ass anyway.
$550 exists there, but damn, that would be a really really bad spot. Good point about services & public trans. Both of which are expected to see cuts and canceled projects.I was actually pleasantly surprised by the results in Seattle given it was such a dramatic shift. It seemed pretty obvious at the time that ~$13 would have been a sweeter spot, but of course it was as much a political virtue signaling as it was an earnest attempt at sensible policy.
And public transportation is shit, and the areas are fairly far away from just about anything you need service-wise. Best case scenario for a father of two children living in North City is that he gets a one-bedroom for $550 a month and only half of his earnings go directly to rent and transportation. The other $5,000-8,000 will have to feed and take care of the family for the year.
I know that, but lowering the minimum wage isn't the answer. If minimum wage can't keep up with the cost of living, why would anyone bother working? If things continue to get worse, people won't even bother working & then small business won't have any employees. Theres comes a point when it no longer makes sense to work & I can see things reaching that point within the decade.
Let's be honest. This all boils down to taxes. The government taxes businesses & citizens so much that neither can afford to make it. Maybe if small businesses were taxed less, they could afford to pay $10 per hour. Then you have all the welfare people sponging off tax payers. Not to mention all of the other ways the gov blows tax money. I work at a section 8 apartment & I could make an opening documentary of all the tax money being abused
In the 1950's, the medium rent was $42, with gas, milk and theater tickets being extremely cheap (roughly .30 cents a gallon). At a minimum wage of .75 cents an hour, it was still possible for one man to pay a month's worth of rent for a family of 4. Inflation went up a bit by the 60s, but still, a $1 an hour minimum wage job was capable of paying a months worth of rent in under 2 weeks of work.Minimum Wage was never suppose to be a living wage. You are not suppose to be able to support a family of 4 working at Carl Jrs. and Government inventions for the sake of compassion will only make things worse.
Really? I thought that's exactly why Roosevelt made the minimum wage. So that a person could make it on their own.Minimum Wage was never suppose to be a living wage. You are not suppose to be able to support a family of 4 working at Carl Jrs. and Government inventions for the sake of compassion will only make things worse.
I know it was initially a joke but the shit South Park made fun of with how they built up the area around Kenny's house to make it "more attractive" to outside investors is a very real thing.In the 1950's, the medium rent was $42, with gas, milk and theater tickets being extremely cheap (roughly .30 cents a gallon). At a minimum wage of 75 cents an hour, it was still possible for one man to pay a month's worth of rent for a family of 4. Inflation went up a bit by the 60s, but still, a $1 an hour minimum wage job was capable of paying a months worth of rent in under 2 weeks of work.
I don't think raising the minimum wage will magically fix everything, but it IS true that inflation has far outpaced wages. That is an issue, and needs to be addressed somehow.
Raising minimum wage means you will not get 40 hours a week, this isn't hard to understand.
$550 exists there, but damn, that would be a really really bad spot. Good point about services & public trans. Both of which are expected to see cuts and canceled projects.
You're a moron. Raising minimum wage doesn't magically convert people working 40 hours to working 20. The exact amount of hours need to be served: so long as you're not paying overtime, there's no difference between two 20's and one 40, except that the former is wildly less efficient given the need to train and the tendency for productivity to be slow at the outset and end period of shifts. Will management try to eliminate labor and lower costs spent on labor to raise prices? Of course, they will be trying to do that always, always, always, and nothing is going to stop that. We can make sure that persons who give their time and earning hours to that enterprise be given a living wage, though.
Instead of us taxpayers subsidizing those employees' mere survival in the form of entitlements while the employer makes billions hand over hand.
You don't have an argument to stand on, as per usual. This is just a partisan reaction for you: your position was already cut out for you by persons smarter than you who profit off of your boot licking.
Minimum Wage was never suppose to be a living wage. You are not suppose to be able to support a family of 4 working at Carl Jrs. and Government inventions for the sake of compassion will only make things worse.



Thats exactly what it was supposed to be.Minimum Wage was never suppose to be a living wage. You are not suppose to be able to support a family of 4 working at Carl Jrs. and Government inventions for the sake of compassion will only make things worse.
How much was taxes to pay for rapefugees ?
It's a good plan. Keep wages down so poor people will be forced to seek govt assistance, then rant about all the entitlements and how we need to cut them because the poor are lazy and taking advantage of tax payers and you can get the poor to hate the really poor.