- Joined
- Jun 14, 2009
- Messages
- 28,964
- Reaction score
- 15,423
Like clockwork....
Apparently I was supposed to consider them the slave class?
And you guys whine over people "not caring about your issues".
<puh-lease75>
Like clockwork....
Uh, no shit?
If not them, then who? Lmfao.
Rent controls are a tough cookie to bite into though, there's no way that i've seen to do it gracefully. In ATX for instance, i'm (as a middle class person) finding myself priced out of Austin despite making more than enough to be self sufficient. I make too much for the controlled apartments, but not enough to live downtown without adjusting my lifestyle to an unreasonable degree. You risk pricing out the middle class instead of the poor, which can be more harmful to local economies. It's a hard issue to address.
I don't think people working part time at Burger King is your textbook definition of working class. And raising minimum wage will only cut those people hours and will not get them more money
There are no union members making minimum wage. They're concerned because they negotiate their wages off the area's prevailing non-union wages
That's what happens when you open your doors to Californians who bring their left wing policies to Texas and make it just as expensive as California. You better hope single payer dies here or you are getting new neighbors
I expect there will be an uptick in jobs.
"you guys".... ha...Apparently I was supposed to consider them the slave class?
And you guys whine over people "not caring about your issues".
<puh-lease75>
I'm sorry you're going to get paid less nowWhy does the GOP hate the working class?
Pretty sure Austin becoming a tech hub and a mecca for skilled technical workers is what increased prices, but thanks for your uninformed input.
Yeah because that didn't happen in California too...
DEFINITION of 'Working Class'
A socioeconomic term used to describe persons in a social class marked by jobs that provide low pay, require limited skill and/or physical labor, and have reduced education requirements. Unemployed persons or those supported by a social welfare program are often included in this group.
Read more: Working Class http://www.investopedia.com/terms/w/working-class.asp#ixzz4mAqzPAYe
working class
Socioeconomic class consisting of individuals that are paid an hourly wageand considered to be lower-middle class. Typically these individuals work blue-collar jobs such as manufacturing, retail sales, or food service. Also called lower class.
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/working-class.html
work·ing class
ˈwərkiNG ˈˌklas/
noun
adjective
- 1.
the social group consisting of people who are employed for wages, especially in manual or industrial work.
"the housing needs of the working classes"
https://www.google.com/search?q=working+class
- 1.
relating to people belonging to the working class.
"a working-class community"
<puh-lease75>
Loooool.
When I got out of high school in 95 and wanted to work a bit I built refrigerators for min wage. Made 35k a year for 37 hour weeks. With 6 weeks paid vacation.
Well, then I expect there won't be a downtick in jobs.No, there won't be. The wage was only in affect for a few weeks.
This is really one of the most offensive and blatant shots at the urban poor by disaffected rural whites that I've seen. While I oppose Illinois proposed statewide minimum wage (because of the market variance between Chicago and rural Illinois), this was both a humble increase ($10) and done at the correct political level (municipal) that it wouldn't adversely affect rural markets and would provide desperately needed assistance to working class St. Louisans.
Honestly, wage floors should always be instated at the municipal or county level and should only be overridden in very clearly political or unreasonable scenarios. GOP congressmen from rural areas telling St. Louis it can't raise the wages of its workers is so fucking backwards that it perplexes me that someone could think it consistent with conservative and federalist principle. This bill affected them in no way, yet on principle they want to impoverish urbanites by infringing on the sovereignty of an independent city.
(For reference, St. Louis has a large amount of minimum wage jobs and the persons who assume those jobs are concentrated in very-dilapidated North City neighborhoods. For instance, in one of these neighborhoods the average household income is $20,000 and unemployment was 17%. The residents, the plurality of whom work in minimum wage positions, would benefit tremendously from a slight bump in the minimum wage and its reflection of the area's comparatively higher living costs. Instead, they continue to live in abject poverty.)
Anyone who tries to defend this is a piece of shit.
Your own example implies more lower class than 'working class'. BTW You really side stepped the last sentence.
So if businesses came in and paid more, thus attracting people that make more, thus causing landlords to raise rent prices, why are you blaming "people from california" instead of the market?
Jesus, this is textbook supply and demand, but you're blaming California. You're a caricature.
Because those people politically created an atmosphere of higher taxes and high regulations that made business in California toxic and business in Texas appealing. Now those same people are creating the exact same atmosphere for Austin as the one that they left in the first place. pretend like the problem is 'too many people' is ignoring why those people left in the first place. It also explains why you prefer Austin to Dallas.