Crime Some kind of mass shooting at the Superbowl parade



Very sad but true. As an independent moderate, this is precisely why I hate the left way more than I hate the right. They have spent a decade making the unfounded claim that “racism is the #1 issue plaguing America” and “racism is a public health crisis” but this kind of stuff is really the only racism we see today, and the reality is it happens to be anti-white.

I have gone through several articles and none of them mention the names, race, or photos of the assailants (besides one NY Post article which showed one photo of one of the perps).

In identical cases where the assailant is white, the name, photo, and race is mentioned constantly throughout the article.

It’s funny how asking that people get treated equally is deemed a “controversial, far right” viewpoint in 2024. Being against *actual* racism is now deemed unsavory lol

@My Spot
 
Most shootings ARE in cities with strict gun laws, gangs/criminals ignore them.

because lax guns and culture have created a sprawling black market not found in other first world countries. Even Mexico and Canada's illegal guns are coming from us, it's not just spilling over in other states the problem is so big it's effecting all of north america
 
because lax guns and culture have created a sprawling black market not found in other first world countries. Even Mexico and Canada's illegal guns are coming from us, it's not just spilling over in other states the problem is so big it's effecting all of north america

Which has ZERO to do with removing guns from law breakers.​
 
MO is an open carry state, how come those dudes were taking alive and n custody

Obviously, it's because they're white. We all know if these guys were black the cops would have stood over them and executed them on site.
 
Which has ZERO to do with removing guns from law breakers.​

Sure it does, it has to do with removing the insanely large black market that allows them to easily get guns in the first place.

The idea is make it harder for them to commit the shootings, not get the guns away after they've made mass victims.
 
Obviously, it's because they're white. We all know if these guys were black the cops would have stood over them and executed them on site.
{<huh}

All the shooters were black
Not sure if you were joking because if you were, you might want to workshop the joke a little more, before posting.
 
Sure it does, it has to do with removing the insanely large black market that allows them to easily get guns in the first place.

The idea is make it harder for them to commit the shootings, not get the guns away after they've made mass victims.

Or you do what the democrats and the left doesn't want to even talk about. You punish the criminals. I'm not talking about just after a shooting. I'm talking about the people that ileagly supply the gun or help them get them and the criminals that illegaly have them. Right now they don't. Right now is the cop catch a gangbanger with an illegal gun nothing of any consequence is done. They don't do anything of consequence to someone that got it for them.

You want to reduce the supply go after the people that get illegal guns.

How about if you are caught knowingly supplying ileagl guns to criminals you get 25 to life.

The democrats and the left don't even want to talk about that.
 
All these shooting create victims of kids and women so using them to push for measures to decrease the number of kids and women shot is not disingenuous. And like I pointed out gun control in other places leads to less suicides so another whiff for you there.
Talk about a big whiff.

I'm not going to change how I view firearms because some gang-banger, criminal or unstable person is going to use one to harm themselves or others. Applying blanket gun control to try and address some specific issues within a specific group of people is the definition of disingenuous. It's the MO for people who would rather turn a blind eye to the actual issue and try to force everyone to comply instead of the actual groups of people who should.
 
Talk about a big whiff.

I'm not going to change how I view firearms because some gang-banger, criminal or unstable person is going to use one to harm themselves or others. Applying blanket gun control to try and address some specific issues within a specific group of people is the definition of disingenuous. It's the MO for people who would rather turn a blind eye to the actual issue and try to force everyone to comply instead of the actual groups of people who should.
Why waste your time with someone who wants to ban certain guns based on how scary they look?
 
Sure it does, it has to do with removing the insanely large black market that allows them to easily get guns in the first place.

The idea is make it harder for them to commit the shootings, not get the guns away after they've made mass victims.

Making new laws do nothing about guns that are already here. Criminals with gun offenses get charged, are let right back out without even paying bail, and do it again knowing they will never have even a day of jail time. Rinse and repeat.

Think about who, why, and what, purposely by design, refuses to protect the safety and the lives of our citizens.
 
Last edited:
Guns are already here. Criminals with gun offenses charged, let right back out without paying bail, & do it again having no jail time. Rinse and repeat.

And how did such an insane black market develop here?

The argument “our approach to guns has created such a large issue we shouldn’t attempt to actually regulate it” is a poor one
 
Back
Top