You took the words right out of my mouth, but my ultimate point, is that Rousey is so predictable every time she fights, yet no other fighters can beat her, then it is the fighters, and the division that is weak.
Ronda Rousey is not the greatest because the division is just so weark, it's ridiculous.
Ronda will do the same thing over, and over in every fight, yet fighters can't stop it, or won't stop it, plus, Ronda has bad knees, so she can't kick, yet fighters still can't beat her. This goes to show that the UFC is milking this cash cow for all its worth, and it goes to show the UFC is aware of this advantage.
Ronda Rousey is great at judo in a weak division. Bethe was never a tried, and true mixed martial aritsts, yet the UFC made her out to be a brawler, which is completely false.
Let's face it, Ronda Rousey is the female version of the one-trick pony that is named Palhares.
That's a completely false conclusion. She's the best at what she does because she's one of the best in the world for her weight class in or out of WMMA at what she does.
Did you not see what Demian Maia did to Neil Magny (and SO many others) once it hits the ground? Is that because his division is weak or that his skill on the ground is among the best in the world for his weight class?
You don't seem to understand that even if the women's division was as developed as the men's, it would still be highly unlikely that anyone at 135 would be able to stop her in the clinch, stop her take downs or stop her arm bars.
If you took ALL the 135 women wrestlers, judoka and MMA fighters in the world and stuck them in a cage with Rousey tomorrow, the list of fighters that could stop her when she's in the clinch would still be very, very, very short and even shorter if it's under MMA rules. And that's not because Women's 135 is a weak division (which it is), it's because she's a World Class, Medal winning Olympian Judoka.
Rousey is a world class athlete with a world class skill set that translates extraordinarily well to MMA. And that skill set alone would make her a terror whether you're talking today or 10 years from now. She also happens to be in a division that isn't fully developed.
Would she be as dominant if you dropped her in the Octagon in 20 years? Of course not. Would she still be the Champ? Quite possibly. Would she still be top 5 no matter who comes into women's 135? I think so.
Does that make her the greatest MMA fighter of all time? No. Does it make her the greatest Women's fighter we've ever seen? I would say she has as good a case as anyone. Is she the greatest woman fighter in history? Who knows? History is a really, really long time. However, it's going to be quite a long time before anyone is good enough to even challenge that title as far as WMMA is concerned.
Look at it this way. Wilt Chamberlain was the greatest basketball player that the world had ever seen when he played. It was 3 decades before Michael Jordan showed up and was even considered to be on the same level. Even 5 decades on, Wilt is still considered by some to be the greatest though most now consider Jordan to be the greatest.
Will Rousey hold up as well with the test of time? Maybe. However, just that it's even possible speaks to her significance to the sport of Women's MMA and women's fighting in general.