"Revolution possible when whites become minority"

mixedracefamily-624x416.png


Genocide?
Cute family. Or a nice picture frame filler.

Hey, wait. Isn't that Phoebes dad?
 
Genocide

1.

the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial,political, or cultural group.


Adding coffee to your milk is not genocide.
Umm...yes it is, literally by the definition that you just posted the intentional promotion of integration of different groups in such a way as to eliminate a racial, political, or cultural group as they exist.

I am not even sure how I feel about it, but denying it is....weird.
 
The question is if the following would fall under genocide, or some other word:

group A deliberately implements policy to erase group B using demographics engineering (mass migrations, birth rate supression tactics, and intermixing promotion). Purpose being to eliminate the group not through violence, but for the same reasons as historical genocides.

So if someone wanted to erase the concept of an ethnic Japanese person they could employ these strategies to do that and 'The Japanese' would be essentially eliminated.

Yes, it would be genocidal in my book.
 
Umm...yes it is, literally by the definition that you just posted the intentional promotion of integration of different groups in such a way as to eliminate a racial, political, or cultural group as they exist.

I am not even sure how I feel about it, but denying it is....weird.

The horror of interracial marriages.
 
I agree from the perspective of building up a strong nation. It would only be a mistake to create divisions under that context.

I don't see it as a mistake at all though considering how heavily promoted it is, and how basic this is. Thousands of years of empire behind these decisions, it is clearly no mistake.

Creating divisions deliberately is a tactic of empire designed to weaken populations for easier exploitation and management. I think it's obvious that this is what it's about and the 'mistakes' are not mistakes at all.
See this is where we diverge just a little bit.
 
Umm...yes it is, literally by the definition that you just posted the intentional promotion of integration of different groups in such a way as to eliminate a racial, political, or cultural group as they exist.

I am not even sure how I feel about it, but denying it is....weird.

But wouldn't that be genocide of the other group also? I'm a immigrant myself and the immigrants culture won't survive also. My kids don't speak Spanish and my wife is second generation and she barely knows how to speak it herself.
 
But wouldn't that be genocide of the other group also? I'm a immigrant myself and the immigrants culture won't survive also. My kids don't speak Spanish and my wife is second generation and she barely knows how to speak it herself.

That's a good point.

It's almost as if the people who conflate interracial reproduction with genocide are unable to consider anything except from a very narrow perspective that starts with the premise that everything is being done to victimize them or their race.

Nope, nvm, those people decry identity politics and playing the victim so they wouldn't do that.
 
The world is certainly doomed with the dwindling white population. The overall population is down to about 2/3

But by 2020, over 50% of all the people under 18 will be nonwhite!

And just look at what this invasion is doing to our schools:


01_Fig1.jpg




Complete chaos and societal decay coming. But that's what the Cultural Marxists want it, so...
 
But wouldn't that be genocide of the other group also? I'm a immigrant myself and the immigrants culture won't survive also. My kids don't speak Spanish and my wife is second generation and she barely knows how to speak it herself.

If some people from group A emigrate into group B, group A still persists after the logical conclusion of this process.

Also, the term genocide requires a deliberate policy with intended end game.
 
If people from group A emigrate into group B, group A still persists after the logical conclusion of this process.
How so if group B is the majority and controls the major institutions?
 
How so if group B is the majority and controls the major institutions?

Group A in my example would be, say, Japanese. If some Japanese emigrate into Sweden and assimilate into that culture, Japanese aren't gone. Japan is still Japan and that people and culture will persist indefinitely barring other factors.
 
Group A in my example would be, say, Japanese. If some Japanese emigrate into Sweden and assimilate into that culture, Japanese aren't gone. Japan is still Japan and that people and culture will persist indefinitely barring other factors.
Oh I get you now.
 
You guys have a culture that doesn't get along with other cultures, no matter how similar, I guess. I had a Croatian friend that would insult Serbs and when I asked why, he couldn't explain why.

Nah, it's just ridiculously easy to get 2 groups of people to hate each other. You could do it even based on superficial characteristics like eye color, as proven by Jane Elliot's experiment:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/class-divided/

It took her 1 day (!) to make children fight because they have different eye color. It's not much harder to do to adults. Formula is simple: point out a true characteristic that one member of the group has, and present it like they are all like that. Repeat endlessly and congrats, you have 2 groups hating each other even though they are exactly the same.
 
The horror of interracial marriages.
I think you misunderstand me. I have no problem with interracial marriage. I am interracial myself. But your post was factually wrong and it is an important issue because western cultures are being expected to commit suicide where no other group on earth are being attacked on the same issue.

It seems to be only white countries that get attacked for wanting to preserve their cultural identity. In fact for the most part other countries are lauded for fighting off western cultural imperialism. Britain is no longer the same country I visited back in the 70's. It has been fundamentally altered and will never go back. If you were to talk about the exact same thing happening in a middle eastern or Asian nation from white invasion there would be a ton of screaming over the issue.

I'm not even saying that this kind of social evolution is necessarily a bad thing, I'm saying that there is a double standard and western are having there cultures destroyed.
 
Nah, it's just ridiculously easy to get 2 groups of people to hate each other. You could do it even based on superficial characteristics like eye color, as proven by Jane Elliot's experiment:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/class-divided/

It took her 1 day (!) to make children fight because they have different eye color. It's not much harder to do to adults. Formula is simple: point out a true characteristic that one member of the group has, and present it like they are all like that. Repeat endlessly and congrats, you have 2 groups hating each other even though they are exactly the same.

It really is. That psychology is a core part of war propoganda.
 
If people from group A emigrate into group B, group A still persists after the logical conclusion of this process.

Also, the term genocide requires a deliberate policy with intended end game.


How? Group A will be absorbed into B. Their language and culture will also change. I don't know where you live. Mexicans from California are nothing like the ones in Mexico. I'm originally from El Salvador but my kids get a diluted version of my culture. My family and I are group A in your example. My wife is not Salvadoran. My sister married a French Canadian. My family members have married and had kids with Whites, African-American, Mexicans along with Salvadoran. I understand you are into conspiracy theories. But human migration is nothing new.
 
How? Group A will be absorbed into B. Their language and culture will also change. I don't know where you live. Mexicans from California are nothing like the ones in Mexico. I'm originally from El Salvador but my kids get a diluted version of my culture. My family and I are group A in your example. My wife is not Salvadoran. My sister married a French Canadian. My family members have married and had kids with Whites, African-American, Mexicans along with Salvadoran. I understand you are into conspiracy theories. But human migration is nothing new.

I clarified what I meant with Kafir-kun. I think I worded it awkwardly.
 
I think you misunderstand me. I have no problem with interracial marriage. I am interracial myself. But your post was factually wrong and it is an important issue because western cultures are being expected to commit suicide where no other group on earth are being attacked on the same issue.

It seems to be only white countries that get attacked for wanting to preserve their cultural identity. In fact for the most part other countries are lauded for fighting off western cultural imperialism. Britain is no longer the same country I visited back in the 70's. It has been fundamentally altered and will never go back. If you were to talk about the exact same thing happening in a middle eastern or Asian nation from white invasion there would be a ton of screaming over the issue.

I'm not even saying that this kind of social evolution is necessarily a bad thing, I'm saying that there is a double standard and western are having there cultures destroyed.

No country on the face of earth is the same country that was in the 70s.

And lol at fighting western cultural imperialists, you are talking about intellectual elites that nobody listens to, there is no country in the world that has resisted western cultural influence, none. Maybe some of the Islamic ones because of how intolerant Islam tends to be.

Islam in europe is certainly a problem im concerned about, im also concerned about the rise of China, but i trust that western values will trump in the end, like it did during the cold war.
 
Last edited:
No country on the face of earth is the same country that was in the 70s.

And lol at fighting western cultural imperialists, you are talking about intellectual elites that nobody listens to, there is no country in the world that has resisted western cultural influence, none. Maybe some of the Islamic ones because of how intolerant Islam tends to be.

Islam in europe is certainly a problem im concerned about, im also concerned about the rise of China, but i trust that western values will trump in the end, like it did during the cold war.
Thats ridiculously untrue. In Europe alone Finland, Switzerland, much of eastern Europe, China, Korea...I could go on for some time have remained largely culturally isolated from the outside.

Bullshit, its mostly the religious leaders not the intellectual leaders that argue for resistance to cultural imperialism but there are plenty of countries that as a whole remain resistant to outside cultural influences.
 
Back
Top