"Revolution possible when whites become minority"

goldennirvana

Satanic black magic!
Banned
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
11,552
Reaction score
3,178


This is now Guardian-worthy. Outright hatred for an entire race of people, but is acceptable because non-whites can't be racist because power + prejudice + privilege + blood of newborn born on full moon + five plucked hairs from a poodle's asshole.

What these SJWs don't understand is that they're making the predictions of the far right come true. The far right has long predicted that the elite has it in for whites and that once whites become the minority, they will then suffer greatly.

And really people, is there still anyone out there denying that it's only countries with whites majorities that are subjected to mass immigration? For those who respond with 'yeah but Europe's fertility rate is too low, so they need immigrants'... DUMMY, WHY is Europe's fertility rate so low? Because it has left behind the traditional family and women are now in the workplace, instead of in the home raising children. And that's the REALLY funny thing about leftists - they want to take advantage of people around the world (mainly Muslims) who still place value on the traditional family, bringing them into Europe to 'have the children Europeans won't have'... but at the same time they promote the very ideas that have led to European women leaving the home and entering the workplace, which resulted in the decrease in the birthrate. So what exactly does that tell you? Of course it's a plan. Europe is under attack, and more broadly, white people are. Those who deny it are either too stupid to see it, or are lying.
 
You realize, that in most cases, the women had to enter the workplace. Were I live, unless you had a REALLY good job, you needed 2 incomes to support your family. So both partners had to work.. I would wager it is just to expensive to raise kids, so why bother.. Espeically when money that would go to raising kids, could then be used for things like fun. You know having a life. Which tends to get fucked over when you have kids.. I should know I have 2 of them..
 


This is now Guardian-worthy. Outright hatred for an entire race of people, but is acceptable because non-whites can't be racist because power + prejudice + privilege + blood of newborn born on full moon + five plucked hairs from a poodle's asshole.

What these SJWs don't understand is that they're making the predictions of the far right come true. The far right has long predicted that the elite has it in for whites and that once whites become the minority, they will then suffer greatly.

And really people, is there still anyone out there denying that it's only countries with whites majorities that are subjected to mass immigration? For those who respond with 'yeah but Europe's fertility rate is too low, so they need immigrants'... DUMMY, WHY is Europe's fertility rate so low? Because it has left behind the traditional family and women are now in the workplace, instead of in the home raising children. And that's the REALLY funny thing about leftists - they want to take advantage of people around the world (mainly Muslims) who still place value on the traditional family, bringing them into Europe to 'have the children Europeans won't have'... but at the same time they promote the very ideas that have led to European women leaving the home and entering the workplace, which resulted in the decrease in the birthrate. So what exactly does that tell you? Of course it's a plan. Europe is under attack, and more broadly, white people are. Those who deny it are either too stupid to see it, or are lying.


I don't think there's a master plan to convince white people not to breed. They make that decision themselves. If both parents have to work, yeah it breaks down the family, but women came up with that on their own because being a housewife with no options can be quite shitty. Also, if you do have kids it's better to have only one, or few that way their inheritance is better, and they get all the parental attention, and resources. It's not a conspiracy. Just individuals making choices.
 
You realize, that in most cases, the women had to enter the workplace. Were I live, unless you had a REALLY good job, you needed 2 incomes to support your family. So both partners had to work.. I would wager it is just to expensive to raise kids, so why bother.. Espeically when money that would go to raising kids, could then be used for things like fun. You know having a life. Which tends to get fucked over when you have kids.. I should know I have 2 of them..

And why do both parents have to work?

Because those at the top have conspired to crush the middle class and make a single-income household unrealistic for all but the well off.
 
Helter skelter is about to get real haha
 
I don't think there's a master plan to convince white people not to breed.

It's not white people who need to stop breeding, it's third world countries, and as far as I can see, there isn't a constant push to get women in third world countries out of the home and into the workplace, or a drive to spread feminism in these countries, especially with the same ferocity there has been to spread feminism throughout the West.

They make that decision themselves.

After they've been brainwashed with the idea that women are oppressed in the home and only after they enter the workplace, will they truly be 'liberated'. There's also calls for more female head chefs. The irony of that, eh? Leftists want MORE women in the kitchen HAHAHAHAHA... but to cook for total strangers. So apparently, cooking for your family is oppressive, but cooking for strangers in a restaurant is 'liberating'. Comical.

If both parents have to work, yeah it breaks down the family, but women came up with that on their own

They came up with what on their own? Women were brainwashed to believe they have to enter the workplace.

I'm not saying women should never work, but primarily, women should have children. Then later in life, they should enter the workplace. If women enter the workplace, lowering the fertility rate as a result, then the government decides to allow in immigrants who GREATLY value the family and have large families. What exactly do you call that? I call it an attempt to engineer a new society aka shifting demographics. It's not something that 'just happens'. It's planned and is being executed before our very eyes.

because being a housewife with no options can be quite shitty.

That's the exact kind of propaganda Western women have had pumped into their heads for the past 50+ years. Women can do far more than just raise children. I'm not denying that. But first & foremost, they should be bringing new life into the world. This COMPLETELY shuts down the argument for mass immigration. If native women are having enough children, no need to import loads of immigrants. Simple.

Also, if you do have kids it's better to have only one

/facepalm

That's the exact problem Europe has right now. Better to have only one? If all of humanity went down that route, they'd go extinct. Two is best. Some will have three, and some only one. It evens itself out.

or few that way their inheritance is better and they get all the parental attention, and resources.

You've bought the propaganda hook, line & sinker. Better Inheritance? LOL! Fuck inheritance - you work for your own money. You won't get any 'parental attention' if the mother is out at work, so that's a moot point. And resources? Eh?

It's not a conspiracy. Just individuals making choices.

I have explained quite clearly how it most certainly is a conspiracy. The left has promoted ideas which have resulted in Western women leaving the house & entering the workplace. THEN they say that mass immigration is necessary due to 'low birthrates'. But why are the birthrates low now? Because women entered the workplace. LOL how can you not understand this?
 
Oh noes itz the end timez!
 
Because those at the top have conspired to crush the middle class and make a single-income household unrealistic for all but the well off.

Only if you want to spoil your children all the time. It really isn't difficult to take care of 2-3 children, financially... IF you do it correctly. Answer: don't spoil your children, turning them into little brats who have everything handed to them.
 
Increasingly insular behavior is inevitable as a communities standard of living falls. Its perfectly natural, long term serious problems could arise between these communities. But obviously its unlikely to happen as the OP suggests.
 
You said a bunch of stuff, but for most women living as a homemaker without the option of divorce, and possible employment sucked. The guy could beat you, molest the children, be a drunk, and what could you do? If you leave him, and there's no job you're fucked. Maybe men should have treated their wives better, and not as many would want to work.
 
You said a bunch of stuff, but for most women living as a homemaker without the option of divorce, and possible employment sucked. The guy could beat you, molest the children, be a drunk, and what could you do? If you leave him, and there's no job you're fucked. Maybe men should have treated their wives better, and not as many would want to work.

How many men treated their wives badly? Or drunkenly beat them?
You say that living as a homemaker sucked for most women. Do you have the statistics to back this up?

You've said a bunch of stuff, but for most women living as a homemaker, without the necessity of employment, to be able to an active and consistent part of their children's lives, was the preferred option. Few men were trashy wife-beaters, and society didn't support it. Most children that are abused by a parent are victims of mothers, not fathers. Society changed and forced new roles onto women, which they have come to accept, but just because that's the way it is it doesn't mean that's the way the majority wanted it to be.
See how easy that is to say?

You're just throwing out oft-repeated political talking points as if they're axiomatic, because you've been trained to believe things without thinking for yourself.
 
BTW, the anti-white SJW thing is an american thing.

In Europe, being white or non-white isn't really on people's mind.
 
BTW, the anti-white SJW thing is an american thing.

In Europe, being white or non-white isn't really on people's mind.

Fuck-White-People-Wits-2016-2-620x330.jpg


12654489_1250057141689057_8104512276596627153_n.jpg


University in South Africa.
 
BTW, the anti-white SJW thing is an american thing.

In Europe, being white or non-white isn't really on people's mind.
I was in Germany and France, not too long ago.
Especially with France. I was listening to the news about the no-go zones. That was silly.
I walked all over Paris and did not feel threatened for a second.
I saw some women wearing hijabs, so maybe I should have freaked out?

Edit: there was one gypsy woman that got to me, trying to scam me.
But I just told her to fuck off and she was polite and listened.
 
I was in Germany and France, not too long ago.
Especially with France. I was listening to the news about the no-go zones.
I walked all over Paris and did not feel threatened for a second.
I saw some women wearing hijabs, so maybe I should have freaked out?

Well there are messed-up districts in Paris and real no-go zones in the suburbs.

But I was referring to the white / non-white thing. It's mainly an american obsession. People don't really think in these terms in Europe.
 
Well there are messed-up districts in Paris and real no-go zones in the suburbs.

But I was referring to the white / non-white thing. It's mainly an american obsession. People don't really think in these terms in Europe.
There really are no-go zones?
I walked around without any maps and just enjoyed the city.
There was this huge FOX scare report about Paris, a little earlier than when I went.
I went into some neighborhoods where there were obviously mostly Muslim people and I enjoyed their falafel roll.
That was about it, really.
 
Back
Top