"Revolution possible when whites become minority"

[Pls Respond]

ITT Proof of the people that the video is talking about.


Acting the sky is falling, panick voting for Donald Trump to respond against SJW/PC shit.


Both sides are so pathetic lol.

 

[Awesomesauce]

Genocide implies intent and force.

I don't see who force would be necessary, by definition.

 

[Rod1]

I don't see who force would be necessary, by definition.

Because you cant force people to do something without force.

 

[Awesomesauce]

Because you cant force people to do something without force.

There are less then 300 people left of my tribe. If someone was to come along and offer each of them 10000 dollars in order to agree not to have children with each other, would that not be genocide?

 

[Rod1]

There are less then 300 people left of my tribe. If someone was to come along and offer each of them 10000 dollars in order to agree not to have children with each other, would that not be genocide?

Yes, that would be genocide, if the intent was indeed wiping your tribe, but then again, it would be more like assisted suicide.

How is that relevant to the point at hand i dont understand.

 

[Awesomesauce]

Yes, that would be genocide, if the intent was indeed wiping your tribe, but then again, it would be more like assisted suicide.

How is that relevant to the point at hand i dont understand.

My point was that force isn't necessary, coercion would be enough.

 

[Rod1]

My point was that force isn't necessary, coercion would be enough.

Giving you money to do something is not coercion. You can very well not take the money.

 

[Awesomesauce]

Giving you money to do something is not coercion. You can very well not take the money.

Let me frame my meaning another way. Imo, creating an environment which will tend to produce results which eliminate a culture or race regardless of method could reasonably be described as genocide and I don't think there is anything in the actual definition of genocide to suggest what I am saying is an incorrect interpretation.

 

[Rod1]

Let me frame my meaning another way. Imo, creating an environment which will tend to produce results which eliminate a culture or race regardless of method could reasonably be described as genocide and I don't think there is anything in the actual definition of genocide to suggest what I am saying is an incorrect interpretation.

Deliberate intent.

You cant simply say that capitalism is genocide, or that economic migration is genocid. Unless there is an specific intent.

Accidental genocide is not a thing.

 

[Awesomesauce]

Deliberate intent.

You cant simply say that capitalism is genocide, or that economic migration is genocid. Unless there is an specific intent.

Accidental genocide is not a thing.

I never said either of those things were, but I disagree as well. By not adopting local culture, anyone entering a "cultural zone", is intentionally subverting that culture. I suppose you could say its genocide by sloth, or apathy in some cases but there is little doubt that some members of such a community will attempt to change the local culture intentionally. Although again, that's all conflating race and culture.

By your rational much of southern Africa would now be mainly populated by whites. Left to there own economic devices, blacks in the region would have found it impossible to compete and been forced to move out of the area. Would that have been cultural genocide?

 

[Rod1]

I never said either of those things were, but I disagree as well. By not adopting local culture, anyone entering a "cultural zone", is intentionally subverting that culture. I suppose you could say its genocide by sloth, or apathy in some cases but there is little doubt that some members of such a community will attempt to change the local culture intentionally. Although again, that's all conflating race and culture.

By your rational much of southern Africa would now be mainly populated by whites. Left to there own economic devices, blacks in the region would have found it impossible to compete and been forced to move out of the area. Would that have been cultural genocide?

1.- LOL immigrants are genociders just because they exist, gotcha.

2.- No, because whites found working with the already existing population was more profitable than trying to wipe them out. Left to their own devices most of southern Africa would still be black with a white and mixed ruling elite.

 

[Awesomesauce]

1.- LOL immigrants are genociders just because they exist, gotcha.

Thats not what I said at all, I said immigrants who refuse to adopt the local culture are defacto contributing to cultural genocide. You laugh at this, but there is a reason that so many countries allow only a tiny trickle of immigrants, and this is exactly why. These countries are not willing to sacrifice the native culture to satisfy some sense of duty to outsiders.

2.- No, because whites found working with the already existing population was more profitable than trying to wipe them out. Left to their own devices most of southern Africa would still be black with a white and mixed ruling elite.

No they didn't. The boars had a working relationship with the blacks to a certain extent but they were mostly just farmers, by the time South Africa as a nation had reached the position to institute apartheid it was an attempt to mollify both the blacks who were quickly being displaced, the whites who were tired of the crime and violence, and the international community that considered the pay to leave schemes that the South Africans were considering (and by some reports had already instituted). Left completely on economic grounds, there would be a minuscule number of blacks in South Africa.

But again, your conflating race and culture. I said cultural genocide. One could argue that cultural genocide in South Africa already happened (I think it clearly has) but there are definitely those that are motivated by the idea of turning back the clock and turning South Africa into what it was before whites came.

 

[Rod1]

Thats not what I said at all, I said immigrants who refuse to adopt the local culture are defacto contributing to cultural genocide. You laugh at this, but there is a reason that so many countries allow only a tiny trickle of immigrants, and this is exactly why. These countries are not willing to sacrifice the native culture to satisfy some sense of duty to outsiders.



No they didn't. The boars had a working relationship with the blacks to a certain extent but they were mostly just farmers, by the time South Africa as a nation had reached the position to institute apartheid it was an attempt to mollify both the blacks who were quickly being displaced, the whites who were tired of the crime and violence, and the international community that considered the pay to leave schemes that the South Africans were considering (and by some reports had already instituted). Left completely on economic grounds, there would be a minuscule number of blacks in South Africa.

But again, your conflating race and culture. I said cultural genocide. One could argue that cultural genocide in South Africa already happened (I think it clearly has) but there are definitely those that are motivated by the idea of turning back the clock and turning South Africa into what it was before whites came.

1.- Immigrants dont write immigration laws, if a country decides to accept a bunch of people that have no desire of assimilation then its all on the host country, so blame democracy i guess.

2.- Apartheid South Africa is exactly what i said "majority black with white and mixed ruling elite".

3.- The Boer people still exist and the reason why their numbers are dwindling has more to do with white flight and low birthrates. A better example would be Zimbabwe.

 

[RIPWarrior]

Wheres all this hatred for white people you claim? If you're talking about hate crimes against them from certain minority groups, asians actually suffer more from that on a disproportionate level. If you're talking about double standards then practice what you preach and stop the BS double standards against asians. When a presidential candidate can say "I hate all g00ks' and not a peep from the media, then you will know what double standards are all about.

Dumbass if you think white people are being erased from their homelands then you only have your own people to blame for that, breed more and elect better leaders. And progressives are not the problem at that point but rather apathy, greed and selfishness. FROM YOUR OWN PEOPLE!!

So channel your rage towards them instead of some innocent Indian families in the GTA who immigrated to a 100 year old country, who as a group have low crime rates, low rate of social assistance and are productive to society. Oh but they speak a different language or eat different food and that triggers the shit out of your petty existence.

And neocons have no remorse for anything, they are willing to murder 10s of millions in far away lands without batting an eyelash. 100 million civilians murdered by the US army in the last century, 95% of those non-white peoples. So it can happen, it does happen and if these types gain full power a billion non-white people being murdered is not far of a stretch. And the reason its so scary is because unlike the muslims these people have the tech, the resources and the military to make it happen.

You are all over the place and are not focused. You’re irrational. This will be my last post. Progressives can’t think anymore or do research.

If you have to ask where it is then you are blinded by your own arrogance.

Genius, you greatly underestimate the power of subversion. If the masses were fed the truth instead of lies, this wouldn’t be happening. It is very easy to herd the sheep. Unfortunelty not everyone can resist like others do.

Some innocent Indian family? There it is. You believe all these immigrants coming from incredibly racist countries are all innocent victims. Indians can be very fucking racist. You have not worked with them. You do not know how they can operate. They are capable of being just as racist as any white man. I’m happy with my existence. I most certainly do not see it as petty. There’s different levels of truth. I like climbing the ladder. It's a wonderful and horrifying experience when you reach the top.

Yeah white people just really want to murder non whites. Religion has nothing to do with it (sarcasm). Yes there is a fourth. Judaism, Christianity, Islam and..... take a guess!

The rest of your post screams desperation. Sorry man you lost this one.