"Revolution possible when whites become minority"

[Jack Reacheround]

TS saying that only white countries are the ones encountering mass immigration - so why do you think that is? I'm betting your reason is racist and incorrect.

 

[Bald1]

I don't think that mixed individuals identifying as black is unrelated to the one drop rule that was imposed on blacks.

In Brazil the concept of mulattoes as distinct from both whites and blacks is more prevalent than it is in the US and that's because they didn't have anything like Jim Crow. In fact their racists wanted to deliberately mixed with the blacks instead of segregating them but that's besides the point. Point is the phenomena of mixed Americans identifying as blacks is the legacy of Jim Crow and not a black idea. I know people like to say that's the past but its well within living memory.

How long do we have to cling on to the past before we're allowed to let go, and move forward without that weight holding us back?

If you live your life with the burden of guilt and anger poisoning you, you're going to have a tough time improving your situation. I wasn't alive during that era, you weren't either, but most importantly neither were the most vocal people who cry "racism".

Indeed, but only one side is bitching about genocide through miscegenation.

Let them bitch. Willingly taking a mate of a different race is hardly a genocidal practice. Cheering for the disappearance of a race is pretty damned racist though.

 

[Islam Imamate]

How long do we have to cling on to the past before we're allowed to let go, and move forward without that weight holding us back?

As long as its within living memory would be a good rule of thumb

If you live your life with the burden of guilt and anger poisoning you, you're going to have a tough time improving your situation. I wasn't alive during that era, you weren't either, but most importantly neither were the most vocal people who cry "racism".
.

I don't know if its anger as much as it is a cultural conception of race. In the US you're either white or black. Maybe it will change but if it does it will be because of mixed individuals themselves, not people like you or I telling them to let it go.

 

[Bald1]

There's a whole lot of scared people in this thread exaggerating. I personally can't wait for the whole world to look like "Brazil". Less shit to fight about imo

I used to say much the same thing to any racist I'd encounter. "I can't wait until we're all light brown, cause then you'll finally stfu" is something I've shared on reservations, house parties, and family gatherings. I'm a bit more abrasive in real life.

 

[Bald1]

I don't know if its anger as much as it is a cultural conception of race. In the US you're either white or black. Maybe it will change but if it does it will be because of mixed individuals themselves, not people like you or I telling them to let it go.

This is true, and given my nature it's something I should have learned a long time ago.

 

[Awesomesauce]

People have changed a lot but havent changed at all, how does that works? In the end, you are basically equating culture with race.

Culture is not static, culture changes, even without its people changing at a genetic level, a Swede today has nothing in common with a pagan viking.

Sorry but that's not true at all. I am saying that having an area's culture changed in order to accommodate outsiders is not the same thing as an area's culture changing by the will of the community itself. Nobody of any culture should be forced to change their culture to accommodate a migrating population that won't assimilate or put another way, nobody has the right to move somewhere and try to fundamentally change the nature of that area. Move somewhere the values and culture reflect your values and/or culture. If that place is a shithole, then its probably because your values suck and you should probably reconsider them.

 

[Awesomesauce]

Let them bitch. Willingly taking a mate of a different race is hardly a genocidal practice. Cheering for the disappearance of a race is pretty damned racist though.

Nobody is talking about individuals taking mates from other races. People are talking about systematically encouraging it in order to wipe out a race/culture. This was a common practice for pretty much all of human history. Kill the males, rape the females. Virtually every culture on earth practiced this for the vast majority of human history.

Genocide was literally performed in exactly this way by the horde dozens of times as they crossed Eurasia as just one example.

 

[Metusalemi]

There's a whole lot of scared people in this thread exaggerating.

Just like in every Trump thread.

 

[Codpiece]

. Also, if you do have kids it's better to have only one, or few that way their inheritance is better, and they get all the parental attention, and resources.

Would you be able to show me where you learned this, and also explain your personal experience with family (without being too personal) that has led you to believe this? Because I could not disagree more.

I base that on my experience having three siblings and having three of my own children (13, 8, 3) and another on the way. Making time to spend with each child is critical, as is each child spending time with the other children. They all seem to be developing well.

I do not believe it is up to me to deliver them generational wealth, either. But that's my persoanl opinion and since I will be dead when they receive whatever I leave behind I'll not know whether I should have left the, a little more or had less lids so the others got a better share.

 

[Amerikuracana]

There's a whole lot of scared people in this thread exaggerating. I personally can't wait for the whole world to look like "Brazil". Less shit to fight about imo

Yeah... But you know 100% there will be more violence across the board then.

 

[M3t4tr0n]

Yeah... But you know 100% there will be more violence across the board then.

No one knows that.

 

[panamaican]

Our law is English law. Yes, culture progressed. But there are very different cultures throughout the areas that the Romans had reign over.. Based basically in the differences in the people.

You're wrong man. The "Romans" essentially colonized places like the Congo and brought their culture with them. That wasn't going to take hold once they left, I'm really sorry about that reality.

Our law is English law...and English law is heavily influenced by the legal tenets put forth by Rome. Which is my point. We've preserved Roman cultural components long after the Romans presented them. They became English law and then American law and the law of plenty of other nations influenced by England but never directly influenced by Rome. But their origin remains Roman.

As for Rome and the Congo, now you're just making things up. Rome never came close to colonizing the Congo. They never went much south of the Mediterranean coastal regions.

 

[Rod1]

Sorry but that's not true at all. I am saying that having an area's culture changed in order to accommodate outsiders is not the same thing as an area's culture changing by the will of the community itself. Nobody of any culture should be forced to change their culture to accommodate a migrating population that won't assimilate or put another way, nobody has the right to move somewhere and try to fundamentally change the nature of that area. Move somewhere the values and culture reflect your values and/or culture. If that place is a shithole, then its probably because your values suck and you should probably reconsider them.

What its fundamentally? because the Meiji restoration fundamentally changed japanese culture and society, WW2 fundamentally changed japanese culture and society.

In the end, you claim that culture is all that matters and i agree, but your logical followup doesnt matches that claim.

Ethnic makeup is a non-issue on the face of cultural supremacy. Absolutely nobody claims that Alexandre Dumas wasnt a full fledged Frenchman, despite the fact that he was 1/4th black, his father a Thomas-Alexandre Dumas was a general in chief of the French Army of the Alps with massive victories against the Austrian, nobody thought he was something else but a frenchman.

Simply because the french practiced hyperdescent, a frenchman having a child with his slave was his son, and as his son he deserved the best, so he was taken from his mother and sent to france to be educated as the son of a nobleman.

 

[Bald1]

Nobody is talking about individuals taking mates from other races. People are talking about systematically encouraging it in order to wipe out a race/culture. This was a common practice for pretty much all of human history. Kill the males, rape the females. Virtually every culture on earth practiced this for the vast majority of human history.

Genocide was literally performed in exactly this way by the horde dozens of times as they crossed Eurasia as just one example.

I get your point, but "flooding the market" with people of different races, and encouraging interbreeding isn't what I'd call genocide. Maybe they're making a go at it, but the lack of force leaves me skeptical.

 

[Amerikuracana]

Our law is English law...and English law is heavily influenced by the legal tenets put forth by Rome. Which is my point. We've preserved Roman cultural components long after the Romans presented them. They became English law and then American law and the law of plenty of other nations influenced by England but never directly influenced by Rome. But their origin remains Roman.

As for Rome and the Congo, now you're just making things up. Rome never came close to colonizing the Congo. They never went much south of the Mediterranean coastal regions.

I was taking a shot at your assertion that all of Europe is somehow "Roman culture." White people were in the Congo in the 19th century and later. They built some decent cities and made movies there and things like that. They had serious science facilities. They left. None of it was maintained.

 

[TemujinKhan]

People that think like you are scary.

White people aren’t as stupid as you’re implying. Low birth rates, mass immigration, white guilt, feminism, other forms of brainwshing and hatred for white people will without a doubt remove whites from any targeted country overtime.

A homogeneous society is one that can be unified.

What is real in your face racism?

Plenty of white people get brutally raped and murdered every year by non whites. Where are the extermination camps?

You are a sick person. White people fought and died to end that kind of shit. Closing and securing borders and being very selective with who you let in does not mean extermination of non whites. Being against multiculturalism and diversification of everything white does not turn you into Hitler.

I think it would take many consecutive murders and serious terrorist attacks for there to be a forceful removal of people from a country.

Idiot, where did I say all white people, I was specifically referring to radical white nationalists and neo conservatives. If you don't fall into that category then who gives a fuck. When the hell did I say white people never experience racism or brutality, I've spoken out on double standards of racism against whites before so quit tripping kid.

And white people are not going anywhere pal, theres well over a billion of y'all all over the world. White people will still be around long after you're dead and gone, I think fools like you will be surprised when you're an old man and look around and realize theres still a shitload of white people around and your retarded fantasies of the extermination of the white race were never fufilled.

So don't trip, there's still going to be plenty of white blonde girls around to bang for the rest of your life.

 

[RIPWarrior]

Idiot, where did I say all white people, I was specifically referring to radical white nationalists and neo conservatives. If you don't fall into that category then who gives a fuck. When the hell did I say white people never experience racism or brutality, I've spoken out on double standards of racism against whites before so quit tripping kid.

And white people are not going anywhere pal, theres well over a billion of y'all all over the world. White people will still be around long after you're dead and gone, I think fools like you will be surprised when you're an old man and look around and realize theres still a shitload of white people around and your retarded fantasies of the extermination of the white race were never fufilled.

So don't trip, there's still going to be plenty of white blonde girls around to bang for the rest of your life.

Pathetic.

Hitler is not going to rise again.

You are thinking all this hatred for white people and the diversification of their towns and cities is going to cause them to start fighting “all non white males with unrelenting force”. I’m the fool? look at the shit you wrote:

"You kill one of us, we will kill 10,000 of you and not feel an ounce of remorse,"

White people aren't going to start massacring non whites.

The removal of white people from certain countries is a slow process and it can be seen over time. Progressives can’t see it though because of all the brainwashing that is needed to convince the masses that this is what’s best for the future.

I’m not trippin at all, son. I like to accept the truth about the world. The main goal isn’t to kill off white people. The plans are much more sinister.

 

[TemujinKhan]

Pathetic.

Hitler is not going to rise again.

You are thinking all this hatred for white people and the diversification of their towns and cities is going to cause them to start fighting “all non white males with unrelenting force”. I’m the fool? look at the shit you wrote:

"You kill one of us, we will kill 10,000 of you and not feel an ounce of remorse,"

White people aren't going to start massacring non whites.

The removal of white people from certain countries is a slow process and it can be seen over time. Progressives can’t see it though because of all the brainwashing that is needed to convince the masses that this is what’s best for the future.

I’m not trippin at all, son. I like to accept the truth about the world. The main goal isn’t to kill off white people. The plans are much more sinister.

Wheres all this hatred for white people you claim? If you're talking about hate crimes against them from certain minority groups, asians actually suffer more from that on a disproportionate level. If you're talking about double standards then practice what you preach and stop the BS double standards against asians. When a presidential candidate can say "I hate all g00ks' and not a peep from the media, then you will know what double standards are all about.

Dumbass if you think white people are being erased from their homelands then you only have your own people to blame for that, breed more and elect better leaders. And progressives are not the problem at that point but rather apathy, greed and selfishness. FROM YOUR OWN PEOPLE!!

So channel your rage towards them instead of some innocent Indian families in the GTA who immigrated to a 100 year old country, who as a group have low crime rates, low rate of social assistance and are productive to society. Oh but they speak a different language or eat different food and that triggers the shit out of your petty existence.

And neocons have no remorse for anything, they are willing to murder 10s of millions in far away lands without batting an eyelash. 100 million civilians murdered by the US army in the last century, 95% of those non-white peoples. So it can happen, it does happen and if these types gain full power a billion non-white people being murdered is not far of a stretch. And the reason its so scary is because unlike the muslims these people have the tech, the resources and the military to make it happen.

 

[Awesomesauce]

What its fundamentally? because the Meiji restoration fundamentally changed japanese culture and society, WW2 fundamentally changed japanese culture and society.

In the end, you claim that culture is all that matters and i agree, but your logical followup doesnt matches that claim.

Ethnic makeup is a non-issue on the face of cultural supremacy. Absolutely nobody claims that Alexandre Dumas wasnt a full fledged Frenchman, despite the fact that he was 1/4th black, his father a Thomas-Alexandre Dumas was a general in chief of the French Army of the Alps with massive victories against the Austrian, nobody thought he was something else but a frenchman.

Simply because the french practiced hyperdescent, a frenchman having a child with his slave was his son, and as his son he deserved the best, so he was taken from his mother and sent to france to be educated as the son of a nobleman.

I think again you misunderstand me. Your conflating racial and cultural genocide. You said that encouraging cross breeding between ethnic groups could very much be construed as a classical form of genocide. Southern Italians and northern Italians are fundamentally different people at this point. If you were to perform the exact same mixing on northern Italians that happened to southern Italians, then northern Italians would cease to exist as a racial/ethnic group.

I'm not even saying I care about this, Culture is far more important to me then specific genetic legacy. But that doesn't change the fact that it is factually a type of genocide and historically probably the most common.

The only reason this becomes an issue is the hypocritical behavior of some groups on the subject. Israel being a prime example, they have actively encouraged racial mixing in other nations and even applied political and economic pressure to ensure it happens all while being utterly draconian about their own genetic legacy.

I get your point, but "flooding the market" with people of different races, and encouraging interbreeding isn't what I'd call genocide. Maybe they're making a go at it, but the lack of force leaves me skeptical.

I don't consider it a big deal, but claims about the importance and value of diversity become somewhat incongruous when these self same groups seem set on creating the caramel utopia. I say this as a half breed myself, and one without a particular ax to grind concerning race or race mixing.

I'm more about ensuring intellectual honesty on the subject then anything else.

 

[Rod1]

I think again you misunderstand me. Your conflating racial and cultural genocide. You said that encouraging cross breeding between ethnic groups could very much be construed as a classical form of genocide. Southern Italians and northern Italians are fundamentally different people at this point. If you were to perform the exact same mixing on northern Italians that happened to southern Italians, then northern Italians would cease to exist as a racial/ethnic group.

I'm not even saying I care about this, Culture is far more important to me then specific genetic legacy. But that doesn't change the fact that it is factually a type of genocide and historically probably the most common..

Genocide implies intent and force.