• We are requiring that all users add Two-Step Verification (2FA) to their accounts, as found here: https://forums.sherdog.com/account/security Within one week, we will automatically set this up, so please make the necessary arrangements. Reach out to an admin if you encounter issues, and we apologize for any inconvenience.

POLL: Who Faced Better Strikers? Pereira/Adesanya vs. Anderson Silva

Who Faced Better Strikers? Pereira/Adesanya vs. Anderson Silva

  • Pereira/Adesanya

    Votes: 13 86.7%
  • Anderson Silva

    Votes: 2 13.3%

  • Total voters
    15

Dreyga_King of Sherbums

Your 2024 Poster of The Year
Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2019
Messages
22,161
Reaction score
48,736
Alright, Sherbums, I need your help settling an argument with my buddy. We’re debating which group of fighters faced the better strikers: Alex Pereira/Israel Adesanya or Anderson Silva during his legendary UFC run. My stance? The striking level on Pereira’s and Adesanya’s resumes is clearly better, and here’s why:

Pereira/Adesanya’s Resume Highlights:

• Alex Pereira fought Adesanya twice in MMA (beating him once), Sean Strickland, and Jan Błachowicz. Say what you want about Jan, but his kickboxing and power aren’t to be ignored.

• Israel Adesanya faced an absolute murderer’s row of strikers, including:

• Robert Whittaker (twice), one of the most versatile and effective strikers in MMA.

• Kelvin Gastelum, Paulo Costa, Jared Cannonier, and even Yoel Romero (unorthodox, but striking-heavy).

• Let’s not forget his title unification bout with Alex Pereira, one of the most decorated kickboxers to ever enter MMA.

Anderson Silva’s Resume Highlights:

• Anderson Silva certainly fought greats, but were the strikers on his resume as good overall? Here are some of the key names:

• Vitor Belfort—arguably Silva’s best striker opponent, but his style was more power boxing-focused than diverse striking.

• Dan Henderson—a legend, but his striking was mostly about that right hand.

• Rich Franklin—had effective striking but wasn’t at the level of Pereira or Adesanya’s opponents.

• Forrest Griffin—a fun fight, but Griffin wasn’t exactly known for his elite striking.

My Argument:

The diversity and technical level of striking on Pereira’s and Adesanya’s resumes far outclasses Silva’s. They’ve faced fighters with more dynamic striking skills, while Silva often dealt with one-dimensional opponents. Yes, Anderson’s dominance and creativity are legendary, but that doesn’t mean his competition was the strongest when it came to striking.


I’ll drop a poll below, but let me hear your takes: Who faced the better strikers—Pereira/Adesanya or Silva? Let’s settle this once and for all!
 
Yeah, I honestly wanted to see a Vitor rematch because it ended so quickly and crazy with that front kick.

On the other hand, a very old Anderson Silva still gave Adesanya a pretty competitive fight at the end of his career.
 
its easier to strike when your opponents wants to strike only
look what happened to izzy when he faced ddp
 
MW division didn't have top strikers back then. Vitor is pretty good and Silva smoked him. Maybe he wasn't tested as much as Izzy, but when he fought strikers he dismantled them even more dominant than Izzy has.

Cote, Marquardt, and Leben deserve a mention for decent strikers Silva fought. Izzy/Pereira had better strikers though and it's really not debatable.
 
No one beats Final Form Anderson "The Spider" Aldo

qdfrkvwcqrg71.jpg
 
This is a disingenuous argument. The point you're trying to make is that Pereira or Adesanya are better than Silva. They faced better strikers by default due to their kickboxing records.

Actual UFC performance and stats though?

Andy is the king of ko's and mma striking. Even as an old, past prime version, he had a close fight with Izzy. While we'll never see Pereira vs Silva, Pereira is far too hittable for me to comfortably pick him over Silva.
 
Back
Top