- Joined
- Dec 28, 2007
- Messages
- 20,404
- Reaction score
- 7,286
sounds like you with floydI don't know what it is about Loma but some people are really emotionally invested with the guy. They can't admit he's not flawless.
sounds like you with floydI don't know what it is about Loma but some people are really emotionally invested with the guy. They can't admit he's not flawless.
So then by your same logic, you could make an argument for the first 6 rounds going to Loma because they were that close. So we've gone from "Haney won the first 6" to "either Haney or Loma won the first 6" using the same logic you used to make the first statement.That's not how boxing is scored. Sounds silly. Rounds are scored individually with ZERO consideration of even splitting or combining anything that was close. If the rounds were that close then you are literally admitting that 6-0 Haney is justifiable. People who really don't understand scoring still don't get how consistently judging swing rounds can widen the score. Thus, the overall score is not indicative of how close a fight really was in many scenarios.
Thats exactly why its not a robbery or clear victory.So then by your same logic, you could make an argument for the first 6 rounds going to Loma because they were that close. So we've gone from "Haney won the first 6" to "either Haney or Loma won the first 6" using the same logic you used to make the first statement.
Try not to tie your brain in a knot with all those mental gymnastics.
Round 10 for Haney is an arrestable offense. But of course nothing will happen.
Honestly, it sounds like you wanted Loma to win as much as Ward wanted Haney to win.Throughout the fight, there were flurries where Loma would throw 6-7 punches and maybe 3 would land. Promptly, Andre Ward: "None of those are landing"
Yes, they were Andre... You had blinders on because you wanted your guy to win and called the fight as such. Embarrassing performance.
Thats why you didn't see a close fight. You had already made up your mind before the bell rang.. I half expected Loma to get screwed though.
I've been following the sport for 18 years. Longer than I've followed MMA. I'm perfectly aware of how scoring works. Get tf over yourself.Thats exactly why its not a robbery or clear victory.
Thats literally how boxing scoring works. Its not mental gymnastics. Its you having no idea how scoring works but then pretending like you're some authority on it.
Seemed like he was trying to insinuate that the reason people don't like Haney is because his race and "the chains" and "showing off". When in reality it's just fight style. Same people who clown Haney love Spence and Crawford just because they're dawgs in comparison.he was saying don't call it a robbery, because it was a close, competitive fight between two great fighters and regardless of people's bias, they should respect the judges decision.
Floyd was a winner, I never had to make excuses for Floyd.sounds like you with floyd
Loma fans have said I hate him because of his race for years, even though I'm white.Seemed like he was trying to insinuate that the reason people don't like Haney is because his race and "the chains" and "showing off". When in reality it's just fight style. Same people who clown Haney love Spence and Crawford just because they're dawgs in comparison.
Haney isn't popular. If they were going to rob someone, it would have been Haney. Loma is the one with the story. You could see the fans were on his side.I had loma winning or could’ve been a draw. I felt that Haney living in vegas and this fight being in vegas, loma was going to need at least one knock down.