Law No more nationwide injunctions from district judges

[DanSavage]

Just like someone can't be unmurdered or a woman can't be unraped, EOs that have immediate, irreversible effects can't be fixed.

Also EOs have zero, absolutely zero deliberatibe process unlike those things you mentioned, Trump could just go full gatling gun with these EOs firing tens if not hundreds a day, meanwhile Congress and Judiciary review are by design slow and thorough.

Basically the same as arguing online where you can take tens of minutes writing a perfect response and the other guy can reply "LOL NO U! TRIGGERED" in one second.

So, you're saying that neither Congress, nor the USSC can reverse or overturn an EO?

I guess the next President can't reverse an EO issued by the outgoing President, either?

 

[SKYNET]

Facts are facts and I think there is little chance of the boomers rallying behind Pete.

In the end you will be shamed, regardless of your evidence and reasoning. It's such a turn off.

 

[Crazy Source]

Not quite
They want themselves to have absolute power over the other branches, and the executive in particular to have the power to enact a social and political transformation in line with their specific partisan views. Trump is a vessel for undoing the civil rights era shift toward progressive government and toward permanent or quasi permanent reactionary power concentration.

Trump is a vessel for what they have been trying to do forever. I love your breakdowns, but they always make me pissed off. Thanks for fighting the fight.

 

[Crazy Source]

In the end you will be shamed, regardless of your evidence and reasoning. It's such a turn off.

That's really mean.

 

[scoopj]

So where is your line to accept you are wrong? You are now actively advocating direct defiance against the decisions and authority of the Congress, POTUS, SCOTUS. What more does it take to realize who is really threatening "democracy"?

He doesn’t have one. That’s the problem with leftists. Not their knowledge, but their egos.

 

[avenue94]

Yes. How does “lowest quality” = “dumber than average”. Was that your gotcha? LOL if so.

Due to the fact that you’re now completely ignoring my point, becoming overly emotional and bringing up completely irrelevant arguments as to what my position is, I will not respond to this drivel.

I had a higher opinion of you than I should have. Have a good afternoon.

Dumber than average (justice) is my colloquial way of repeating your position. Unless there's another metric of quality you're assessing beyond intelligence?

Like I said, you're insistent that these justices are the lowest quality but can't elucidate even the most bare bones critique of their backgrounds or competence on the bench.

And now, of course, when you get challenged and realize you don't know shit about the judiciary, you want to take your ball and go home. Cheers.

 

[Rob Battisti]

In the end you will be shamed, regardless of your evidence and reasoning. It's such a turn off.

They’d be dumb not to go with Shapiro

 

[Crazy Source]

District judges are limited to the district they are appointed for.

The injunctions would be for their district.

You are just twisting it as best you can. An unlawful act can continue, and that should give you pause.

 

[Crazy Source]

He doesn’t have one. That’s the problem with leftists. Not their knowledge, but their egos.

Well, you guys are fucking it up, brother. Execute what you want. In the shadows. Trump does fuckall and it makes headlines and you clap like seals.

Obama deported more people than Trump. Let that sink in. You have a feckless leader that has a nubbin.

 

[SKYNET]

They’d be dumb not to go with Shapiro

I don't disagree, but I can see a scenario where Pete is favored by the DNC and not supporting him will be shameful.

 

[scoopj]

The talent pool for selection has always been artificially limited. In fact, there were more contenders for Jackson's appointment than there was for Marshall's.

So again, are you arguing that Marshall's nomination was a DEI? Jackson had an equivalent or higher rating than Marshall from the ABA, so either accept your logic's conclusion or explain why it's an exception.

That you can't even highlight what part of her CV is subpar is as plain as day.

Are you actually trying to argue that Thurgood Marshall,’s appointment was influenced by DEI policies? Something that just took hold recently, like the last 10 years? What exactly is your argument? Seems to me he was appointed on merit, whereas she was appointed on gender and ethnic qualifications.

 

[Deorum]

Go on, make me despise him more after his now deleted post mocking the dead people and their puppy in Minnesota which he refused to apologise for. What specifically does he have to do with this?

Oh, nothing much. Just Mike Lee and the GOP doing their usual number trying to sell off millions of acres of public land, wilderness, and wildlife habitat to shitbag plutocrats, private developers, multinational corporations, and foreign governments. Thankfully, they just got dealt a generational defeat. Not a single acre. It was Republicans own constituents in western states who lit them on fire and broke the provision in half. Dems were 100% opposed from the start.

TR smiles down on the nation from the heavens, his greatest legacy preserved for another generation of Americans.

Breaking: Mike Lee's Public Land Sale Plan Is Dead

Sources in Washington D.C. say the public-land provision in the Senate reconciliation bill is officially dead thanks to pressure from hunters and conservationists.

www.outdoorlife.com

Facing overwhelming opposition from all Democrats and a growing number in his own party, Utah Republican Senator Mike Lee tonight withdrew his proposal to sell millions of acres of public land to help balance the federal budget.

Senate leaders, hurriedly working to get the budget to a floor vote this weekend, gave Lee the opportunity to pull his provision, pages 202 to 211 of the thousand-page Big Beautiful Bill, knowing that it would have faced certain defeat by the Republican-majority Senate. That language would have forced the sale of BLM land in 11 Western states to offset tax cuts and royalty rebates to gas and oil drillers.

The language in those pages, sponsored and revised over the last two weeks by Lee, would have created the largest disposal of public land since the Homestead Act. Tens of thousands of hunters, anglers, hikers, and public-land recreationists have pummeled the offices of their congressional delegations with increasingly strident demands to kill Lee’s bill.

That continued pressure from a broad and vocal coalition of rural hunters, suburban hikers, livestock producers, Main Street business owners, anglers, dirtbag climbers, and whitewater rafters made the difference, says Montanan Randy Newberg, host of Fresh Tracks and a vocal public-land advocate.

“Mike Lee did something that we’ve not been able to do, to have all Americans become focused on one issue, no partisanship, no Rs, no Ds, and in the process I hope they have sent a message that public lands are that third rail of American politics,” says Newberg, one of several social-media personalities who rallied his audience around defending public lands. “I think you could also say the same of the Senate, they put partisanship aside to kill this bad idea.”

 

[avenue94]

Are you actually trying to argue that Thurgood Marshall,’s appointment was influenced by DEI policies? Something that just took hold recently, like the last 10 years? What exactly is your argument? Seems to me he was appointed on merit, whereas she was appointed on gender and ethnic qualifications.

My argument is that if you oppose Jackson's nomination because Biden was specifically looking for a black women, you would oppose Marshall's nomination because Johnson was specifically looking for either a black male or a female nominee.

Both had strong records and recommendations prior to being appointed.

The DEI comment is just me mocking people who check under their bed for DEI every night.

 

[fingercuffs]

Oh, nothing much. Just Mike Lee and the GOP doing their usual number trying to sell off millions of acres of public land, wilderness, and wildlife habitat to shitbag plutocrats, private developers, multinational corporations, and foreign governments. Thankfully, they just got dealt a generational defeat. Not a single acre. It was Republicans own constituents in western states who lit them on fire and broke the provision in half. Dems were 100% opposed from the start.

Anyone in good conscience thinking this was ever a good idea is the epitome of un American. We essentially stole this land in the first place so selling it off to the highest bidder? Shame on all of them.

But the main thing that got me was killing off our wildlife. Literally killing them.

 

[scoopj]

My argument is that if you oppose Jackson's nomination because Biden was specifically looking for a black women, you would oppose Marshall's nomination because Johnson was specifically looking for either a black male or a female nominee.

Both had strong records and recommendations prior to being appointed.

The DEI comment is just me mocking people who check under their bed for DEI every night.

What evidence do you have that race and/or gender was a prerequisite in Marshall’s appointment? I just want to be sure we’re comparing apples to apples.

 

[Deorum]

At least he took it out of the bill last minute.

How about we get this re-upped and passed?

Lawmakers working on Great American Outdoors Act renewal

The law has wide bipartisan support, though one prominent Senate Republican could be a hurdle.

www.eenews.net

Top senators have begun working on reauthorizing the Great American Outdoors Act, a sweeping bill passed during President Donald Trump’s first term to fund maintenance projects at the nation’s national parks.

The law is set to run out of funding in mid-2025, while the deferred maintenance backlog at the Park Service it was intended to address continues to grow. When the bill was signed in 2020, the backlog was at roughly $17 billion, adjusted for inflation. According to the latest figures from fiscal year 2023, that figure has now grown to $23 billion.

That’s despite yearly infusions of $1.9 billion from the law into the Legacy Restoration Fund, which was created by the act to address the deferred maintenance backlog. The bill was passed with an overwhelmingly bipartisan vote in 2020 and signed into law by Trump, who has since returned to the White House.

 

[scoopj]

Well, you guys are fucking it up, brother. Execute what you want. In the shadows. Trump does fuckall and it makes headlines and you clap like seals.

Obama deported more people than Trump. Let that sink in. You have a feckless leader that has a nubbin.

I detest Trump as much as you do. But my god, to suggest that Obama was harder on illegal immigration than Trump is laughable. Obama did it when the political climate was more sane. Everyone was behind it because it was rational. Trump had to take a hard line because leftists went full retard.

 

[avenue94]

What evidence do you have that race and/or gender was a prerequisite in Marshall’s appointment? I just want to be sure we’re comparing apples to apples.

Primary sources, as well as the diaries of his and his wife. We also know the small handful of nominees that were considered before settling on Marshall.

As I told rob, this is super basic civics. How can you read Johnson's comments regarding Marshall's nomination, "[it's] the right thing to do, the right time to do it, the right man and the right place" as anything other than an acknowledgment of intentionally picking a black justice.

The language is nearly verbatim of those who voted for Obama because they thought it was time for a black president.

 

[Rob Battisti]

Are you actually trying to argue that Thurgood Marshall,’s appointment was influenced by DEI policies? Something that just took hold recently, like the last 10 years? What exactly is your argument? Seems to me he was appointed on merit, whereas she was appointed on gender and ethnic qualifications.

He’s equating Johnson later on saying it “felt right” to what Biden did with Jackson. There’s no definitive evidence that Johnson explicitly stated he would only choose a Black man for the Supreme Court seat that went to Marshall.

Historical records, including Johnson’s own statements and accounts from aides, suggest he was strongly motivated to appoint a Black justice to break racial barriers and advance his civil rights legacy, but they don’t indicate he restricted his choice to a Black man specifically or exclusively.

Opposed to Biden saying he would only be selecting a black woman.

My argument is that if you oppose Jackson's nomination because Biden was specifically looking for a black women, you would oppose Marshall's nomination because Johnson was specifically looking for either a black male or a female nominee.

Both had strong records and recommendations prior to being appointed.

The DEI comment is just me mocking people who check under their bed for DEI every night.

If Jackson, someone who was nominated from an artificially limited pool based on race and gender isn’t a “DEI hire” no one is. That is to say, she is the definition of a “DEI hire”.

What evidence do you have that race and/or gender was a prerequisite in Marshall’s appointment? I just want to be sure we’re comparing apples to apples.

There is no direct evidence remotely similar to Biden’s exclamation. Nothing was made public. Having expressed personal desires to continue civil rights progress communicated to a spouse does not equal what Biden did.

 

[Fergelmince]

Kirk has expanded on this multiple times. You're intentionally leaving out the context of his comments being based on DEI initiatives. He's had to reiterate this several times when he does debates.




Islam isn't a race.


Not liking something Kirk says about race doesn't automatically make him racist. He makes informed comments on race and can cite all of his sources.

for some reason the retard is ok when black people are skeptical of black pilots.

"We're very nervous flyers. Right? We don't like to get on planes. First thing we do when we get on this plane? We see who's flying this motherfucker. We look in the cockpit. If we look and see a black guy, WE will stop and say, 'Hey...how long you been flying, bro?"