Law Preferred Pronouns at Schools - Fascist Appeals court sides against Ohio school district’s pronoun policy

In another win for the Nazi dictator, now Ohio schools can't compel students to use the preferred pronouns of our most vulnerable students.

They say it's against "free speech" to compel people to use certain language.

WTF is this decision? This will increase suicides and genocide if they're not called ze/zir.

I might have to move out of the country and apply for asylum in Canada if this trans genocide continues.

Appeals court sides with parent group in fight over Ohio school district’s pronoun policy

The William McKinley Monument is silhouetted near the Ohio Statehouse, April 15, 2024, in Columbus, Ohio. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File)

The William McKinley Monument is silhouetted near the Ohio Statehouse, April 15, 2024, in Columbus, Ohio. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster, File)

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — A divided federal appeals court in Ohio ruled against the state’s fourth largest school district on Thursday in a case that pitted its gender pronoun policies against the rights of students who believe there are only two genders.

The full Sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the suburban Olentangy Local School District cannot prohibit students from using gender-related language deemed offensive by others, siding with Parents Defending Education, which had argued the policies were unconstitutional.

The national membership organization first filed suit against Olentangy in 2023, saying the district’s policies requiring the use of peers’ “preferred pronouns” were a violation of students’ rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The district argued the rules were aimed to prevent bullying and discrimination.

The lawsuit had captured broad national attention, with a number of conservative policy groups, the American Civil Liberties Union and Christian, Jewish, Muslim and Hindu rights organizations lining up against the policy and leading LGBTQ+ rights and schools groups lining up generally in defense of it.

The court found the district “has fallen far short” of meeting the standard that allowing such speech would “materially and substantially disrupt” school activities or infringe the legal “rights of others” in the school community.

“Our society continues to debate whether biological pronouns are appropriate or offensive — just as it continues to debate many other issues surrounding transgender rights,” Circuit Judge Eric Murphy wrote for the majority. “The school district may not skew this debate by forcing one side to change the way it conveys its message or by compelling it to express a different view.”

Circuit Judge Jane Stranch retorted in a dissent written entirely without the use of gendered, third-person pronouns for individuals.

While “it may be a new phenomenon for many to use new pronouns or to avoid using pronouns, it is certainly possible,” Stranch wrote, adding that “social mores around pronouns have shifted over the course of American history, and these shifting mores have not suddenly rendered people unable to speak.”

It is not clear how far-reaching the impacts of the ruling might be. One Ohio teachers’ union had told the court that Olentangy’s policies are substantially similar to those used by districts around the state.

A three-judge panel of the 6th Circuit had found against the organization in July 2024, ruling that the school district had sufficiently shown that the speech it sought to prohibit would disrupt classroom instruction. That earlier decision also held that those policies did not compel students and families represented by the parents’ group to use any certain pronouns to address LGBTQ+ students nor suppress alternative viewpoints.

Thursday’s ruling reversed that decision and sent the case back to U.S. District Judge Algenon Marbley in Columbus to issue a preliminary injunction against Olentangy enforcing the pronoun policies.

At issue in the case were overlapping district policies that prohibited the use of gender-related language that other students might deem insulting, dehumanizing, unwanted or offensive and call for the use of peers’ “preferred pronouns.”

The district’s electronic devices policy — which applies both on and off school time — prohibits transmitting “disruptive” material or material that could be seen as harassing or disparaging other students based on their gender identity or sexual orientation, among other categories.


A separate antidiscrimination policy prohibits students from saying or writing “discriminatory language” when they’re under the school’s authority. The policy bans derogatory comments, jokes or slurs based on a range of factors, including gender identity.

The district’s code of conduct echoes many of the same themes a third time.
If anyone watches the entire video it’s 100% accurate .💯

 
Does your son lack common sense?
His entire family most likely does since he’s the head of household as parents are usually the ones who pass down most of what their kids learn and how their kids will behave .

Of course there’s a chance to be smarter and more logical then the parent like myself but in his case I’d say he’s used to getting his way and that’s why he’s so dumb bc he never listens . Lol
 
Nobody has to refer to anyone by their pronouns. Just call people by their name. In California prisons, staff are supposed to refer to inmates by their preferred pronouns as well. Of course if you don't want to you just refer to them by their last name like they've done for centuries. It's just simple way to disregard pronouns.
 
Lol@sincerely believing this lawsuit was brought on behalf of students who felt emotionally or idellogically harmed by calling another student something they dont think they actually are.

As if kids dont spend all day doing that sh*t to each other voluntarily anyway
 
I'm a straight white guy
Doubt.
I don't give one fuck what someone wants to be called
i don't care but let me do some schizoposting about it
and the fact that y'all do shows how absolutely abysmal your cognitive thinking is.
cognition as in recognizing common sense patterns as compared to fantasies?
sounds like you lot are the one with the cognitive thinking.
Like, chockablocked
lol
with shit and misinformation and lies and
everybody clap for the side of empathy and serene contemplation of life and
ah yes, this too.
 
Doubt.

i don't care but let me do some schizoposting about it

cognition as in recognizing common sense patterns as compared to fantasies?
sounds like you lot are the one with the cognitive thinking.

lol

everybody clap for the side of empathy and serene contemplation of life and

ah yes, this too.
That s really bizarre I can‘t find the post you are quoting. But seeing the username i wouldn‘t be surprised if that cream puff blocked me. But i still should be able to read his oestrogen soaked nonsense should i not?
 
That s really bizarre I can‘t find the post you are quoting. But seeing the username i wouldn‘t be surprised if that cream puff blocked me. But i still should be able to read his oestrogen soaked nonsense should i not?
how bizarre. i don't see it either anymore.
what i quoted in my reply was most of it.

it was the usual yelly pms screeching.
 
One of the funniest of some of the excesses of left-wing identity politics is the same folks that became pronoun champions and very enthusiastic about calling people the way they want to be called very overzealously use the terms CIS and latinx that it appears pretty much nobody that's in those groups want to be called.

So the message is basically "we have words for you we get to use whether you like it or not, but you must call us by the terms we want". The complete lack of self-awareness is amazing.
 
One of the funniest of some of the excesses of left-wing identity politics is the same folks that became pronoun champions and very enthusiastic about calling people the way they want to be called very overzealously use the terms CIS and latinx that it appears pretty much nobody that's in those groups want to be called.

So the message is basically "we have words for you we get to use whether you like it or not, but you must call us by the terms we want". The complete lack of self-awareness is amazing.
It’s just activism to make miserable people feel good about themselves.
 
Back
Top