It was a prick letter to send for sure, but it touches on a valid point. As a society, we openly frown upon smoking, drinking to excess, drinking and driving, etc, yet none of those kill as many people as obesity does. If we won't let a newscaster smoke on TV because of the message it would portray, why allow an obese newscaster on TV?
Hero how?
That's a prick thing to say.
Being fat is a stupid choice, but so is being an asshole.
I don't see her sending letters to that dude telling him to change his asshole ways because it sends a very negative message to the next generation of people.
same way rosa parks was a hero
take back your self worth, you are more than just a number on a scale!
It was a prick letter to send for sure, but it touches on a valid point. As a society, we openly frown upon smoking, drinking to excess, drinking and driving, etc, yet none of those kill as many people as obesity does.
In fairness his comment about not letting fat people on tv is someone of a valid point from a purely scientific view.
Social learning theory tells us that behaviour can be learned by watching role models, particularly same sex role models (as Bandura's study shows). This can occur via vicarious reinforcement i.e watching said role model be rewarded/ punished can encourage/discourage the behaviour. Now applied to this scenario, some kids may see journalists as successful, respectable role models and considering this story itself present this woman as a role model as "Livingston is still hearing from kids and adults who view her as a much-needed hero" must consider that fat people on TV encourages children to be fat.
I'm not trying to be a dick but...