- Joined
- Dec 7, 2007
- Messages
- 40,675
- Reaction score
- 13,431
Would you prefer the hundreds of thousands of migrants Republicans bussed all over the country live in the street?
If the sanctuary cites can't take care of them on their own then yes.
Would you prefer the hundreds of thousands of migrants Republicans bussed all over the country live in the street?
They should not be involved in support for illegals.
You can feel that way but it was Congressionally approved funding, nothing illegal or fraudulent about it.They should not be involved in support for illegals.
If the sanctuary cites can't take care of them on their own then yes.
You can feel that way but it was Congressionally approved funding, nothing illegal or fraudulent about it.
Should the red states that accept SSP funding to house migrants also give the money back?
But it's not corruption, so far it's all above board.Which is why thus needed to be exposed, so taxpayers will know and hold the people that did this responsible.
Are they still taking care of them, just sharing the enrichment and fully cooperating with ICE then they should get the money.
If any sanctuary cities change their mind and go to fully cooperating with ICE then they get their funding back.
Holy shit, you guys actually thought "democracy" meant whatever the democrat party want? An unelected DEI district judge trying to block executive orders signed by the elected president and are supported by the majority of voters, on behalf of the losing party with like 30% approval to protect their waste, fraud and payouts to their friends isn't what "democracy" means.
What in the absolute hell are you babbling about? Do you not have anybody in your real life who can intervene and get you some help for the obvious nervous breakdown you've had since the election? We don't have a democracy, we never did, and I only found out it in this thread that none of the people who thought we did even know what the word means. Out of several million federal employees, how many are elected by a national vote?So you plan was just to use the dumbest terms to describe the judicial branch and then demand it doesn't work in our democracy that explicitly creates it in our Constitution?
Edgy. Retarded, but edgy.