Opinion Musk takes aim at law firms involved in Trump policy challenges

[oldshadow]

Trump and Musk are not doing any of this in secret.

They are telling everyone what they find.

Trump said he would handle the liberal judges opinion in a legal manner.

Let's see how fast he can bump this to the Supreme Court and what they have to say.

 

[Andy Capp]

Trump and Musk are not doing any of this in secret.

They are telling everyone what they find.

Trump said he would handle the liberal judges opinion in a legal manner.

Let's see how fast he can bump this to the Supreme Court and what they have to say.

I literally LOL'd at every word of this. Way to go.

 

[nostradumbass]

It’s not my party as I am not a democrat. That makes the entire premise of your post empty and meaningless. I get that you’re very stupid and can only post in simply 1st level thoughts. I am all for eliminating waste it just must be done legally and in accordance with the constitution.

Hahahahaha. "I'm not a democrat, bro, I'm an independent who just happens to vote for every democrat and regurgitates every single thing the party tells me to and demand waste and fraud", just like every other democrat

Not sure if you knew this, but the elected president is the head of the executive branch, and is in charge of all of these scam agencies that have been popping up at a rate of about 3/year for the last 100 years, an activist group from the losing party and a single activist judge who a guy with dementia appointed 5 minutes ago demanding continued corruption and money laundering are not.

I get it, you're a little embarrassed that you tried to use a bumper sticker slogan from the totally not your party, with a word you didn't know the meaning of, and are trying to save face. Now that you can look up the meaning of the word you embarrassingly tried to use, surely you can see how funny it is that you tried to argue that an activist judge trying to block

I also appreciate that according to you, this judge, and the groups who also not democrats, wink wink, Trump had absolutely nothing to do with the deficits from his 1st term because the president doesn't even have the ability to reduce fraud and waste.

 

[sickc0d3r]

Trump and Musk are not doing any of this in secret.

They are telling everyone what they find.

Trump said he would handle the liberal judges opinion in a legal manner.

Let's see how fast he can bump this to the Supreme Court and what they have to say.

He can just ask congress to reconsider funding he doesn’t like. It’s called the impoundment control act. He hasn’t done anything like that, hence the “liberal judges” doing the right thing and telling him to obey his pesky little oath to the constitution.

 

[jk7707]

Trump and Musk are not doing any of this in secret.

They are telling everyone what they find.

They are lying about what they're finding to try to justify their illegal actions. Don't leave those important parts out.

So transparent, nothing is secret!

Oh wait....

White House will not release visitor logs during Trump's second term

 

[Source]

Hahahahaha. "I'm not a democrat, bro, I'm an independent who just happens to vote for every democrat and regurgitates every single thing the party tells me to and demand waste and fraud", just like every other democrat

Not sure if you knew this, but the elected president is the head of the executive branch, and is in charge of all of these scam agencies that have been popping up at a rate of about 3/year for the last 100 years, an activist group from the losing party and a single activist judge who a guy with dementia appointed 5 minutes ago demanding continued corruption and money laundering are not.

I get it, you're a little embarrassed that you tried to use a bumper sticker slogan from the totally not your party, with a word you didn't know the meaning of, and are trying to save face. Now that you can look up the meaning of the word you embarrassingly tried to use, surely you can see how funny it is that you tried to argue that an activist judge trying to block

I also appreciate that according to you, this judge, and the groups who also not democrats, wink wink, Trump had absolutely nothing to do with the deficits from his 1st term because the president doesn't even have the ability to reduce fraud and waste.

You just keep proving my point over and over but you’re too dumb to realize it.

 

[Osculater]

Whatever President Musk

 

[Zazen]

Trump and Musk are not doing any of this in secret.

They are telling everyone what they find.

Trump said he would handle the liberal judges opinion in a legal manner.

Let's see how fast he can bump this to the Supreme Court and what they have to say.

DOGE is exempt from Public Records Law.

There's nothing on the website. https://doge.gov/

It's just whatever he feels like posting on X and most of that is completely made up.

 

[nostradumbass]

You just keep proving my point over and over but you’re too dumb to realize it.

Concession accepted.

 

[jk7707]

Concession accepted.

Here's a question for you. Under what Constitutional authority does the President have the power to unilaterally stop funding allocated by congress to a certain agency created by congress?

 

[Source]

Here's a question for you. Under what Constitutional authority does the President have the power to unilaterally stop funding allocated by congress to a certain agency created by congress?

Do you think that guy has read the constitution? He clearly doesn’t care if it’s legal or not. I mean blah blah blah democrats!

 

[nostradumbass]

Here's a question for you. Under what Constitutional authority does the President have the power to unilaterally stop funding allocated by congress to a certain agency created by congress?

Was that a real question? You don't think any agency in the executive branch is allowed to come in under budget, or in this case, have any control over how much administrative bloat they'll reimburse in the grants they hand out? I mean obviously none of these agencies are in the constitution in the first place, but obviously the NIH have the authority to set grant requirements and restrictions, and aren't constitutionally obligated to approve unlimited bloat to anybody who asks for it.

Just a couple months ago, you all told me the SCOTUS had just given Trump king like powers, and now you're claiming that neither the president nor any of his appointees have any authority at all and don't even have any say in requirements for their own grant approvals.

 

[jk7707]

Was that a real question? You don't think any agency in the executive branch is allowed to come in under budget, or in this case, have any control over how much administrative bloat they'll reimburse in the grants they hand out? I mean obviously none of these agencies are in the constitution in the first place, but obviously the NIH have the authority to set grant requirements and restrictions, and aren't constitutionally obligated to approve unlimited bloat to anybody who asks for it.

Just a couple months ago, you all told me the SCOTUS had just given Trump king like powers, and now you're claiming that neither the president nor any of his appointees have any authority at all and don't even have any say in requirements for their own grant approvals.

Yes. It was a real question that you clearly can't answer.

Since you clearly consider yourself a Constitutional scholar, please explain to all of us normals the distribution of the powers between the three branches of our government.

 

[tastaylvr]

how did musk emasculate trump so badly? What do his fans think? Seems so uncharacteristic of trump lol

 

[filthybliss]

Elon is Trump's handler at this point...By the time that Trump Supporters' neurons make a connection. It'll be too late.

 

[nostradumbass]

Yes. It was a real question that you clearly can't answer.

Since you clearly consider yourself a Constitutional scholar, please explain to all of us normals the distribution of the powers between the three branches of our government.

Well that's quite a dick tuck after your silly question flopped. Do you even know who was being sued here and what it was over? Doesn't really sound like you do. You might also be bummed to find out how the judicial branch works, and that a district judge is not the top of the branch.

 

[ShadowRun]

Do the democrats actually think this is a good look to normal people.

They are going crazy and throwing temper tantrums over exposing waste and corruption of taxpayers money.

Some of the videos I've seen of congress has been nothing but performative and its pitiful.

Water yelling at the security guy "you going to shoot us?" We are congress.

Warrens fake outraged for the BS fiscal protection department she came up with 12 years ago or so.

 

[ShadowRun]

 

[gentel]

Warrens fake outraged for the BS fiscal protection department she came up with 12 years ago or so.

• $17.5 billion – The amount of money the CFPB has put back in Americans’ pockets in the form of monetary compensation, principal reductions, canceled debts, and other consumer relief resulting from CFPB enforcement and supervision work

The CFPB made the economy safer to participate in, which boosts economic activity and growth. Not sure why getting rid of an agency that targets financial crimes and scams would be a good thing

 

[ShadowRun]

• $17.5 billion – The amount of money the CFPB has put back in Americans’ pockets in the form of monetary compensation, principal reductions, canceled debts, and other consumer relief resulting from CFPB enforcement and supervision work

The CFPB made the economy safer to participate in, which boosts economic activity and growth. Not sure why getting rid of an agency that targets financial crimes and scams would be a good thing

• Constitutional Challenges: In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Seila Law v. CFPB that the CFPB's structure, which protected the director from removal by the President, was unconstitutional. This decision increased presidential oversight of the agency.
• Political Tensions: The CFPB has been a target of criticism from some political groups and financial institutions. Posts on X (formerly Twitter) indicate ongoing debates, with some arguing the agency protects consumers from Wall Street abuses, while others claim it overregulates and benefits big financial interests. For example, posts found on X highlight the CFPB's efforts to cap credit card fees and penalize banks, but also note concerns about its potential "deletion" under certain administrations.
• The agency has been a focal point for political debate regarding its funding, independence, and regulatory scope. It's criticized by some for overreach and by others for not doing enough to protect consumers.