Frank Mir also has TWICE as many wins over Nogueira than Nog does over Mir.
What does this have to do with a guy that starched him twice and would a third time if they fought again?
Too much precedence is placed on "top 10 wins" which are subjective. I love how under the "only top ten wins matter" mantra, Nog gets full credit for beating Valentijn Overeem, Semmy Schilt, and Brendan Schaub, yet Mir receives no credit for subbing Brock Lesnar (who would win the title two fights later and defend it twice) or dominating Roy Nelson, both of whom were significantly better MMA fighters than any of the previous 3 I listed.
Frank Mir POUNDED NOG OUT, AND BROKE HIS ARM.
Yes he did. It doesn't mean he had a better career though.
Someone want to remind me what the hell was so special about Nog's career?
Is it simply because he had some success in Pride, and got his shit pushed in by Fedor? What has he really accomplished, that earns him this "legend" status? Good fighter for sure, but let's not pretend the man was unbeatable at any time in his career.
What in gods name is wrong with you?
Someone want to remind me what the hell was so special about Nog's career?
Is it simply because he had some success in Pride, and got his shit pushed in by Fedor? What has he really accomplished, that earns him this "legend" status? Good fighter for sure, but let's not pretend the man was unbeatable at any time in his career.