News McGregor back in court

[Mickf]

It literally says in my profile.

I'm dealing with a razor sharp analytical mind I see.

To had already made up your mind before you learned any details about the case. That's because you are a rape apologist.

You are saying the whole Irish criminal justice system is corrupt because conor is wealthy. Based on what evidence?
Cause thats how things are based in real life. Not like the internet where its about calling people names.

 

[Ares Black]

You are saying the whole Irish criminal justice system is corrupt because conor is wealthy. Based on what evidence?

Not just Irish. Every criminal justice system favours the wealthy.

Cause thats how things are based in real life. Not like the internet where its about calling people names.

I don't think you have any idea what happens in real life. I also don't think you have actually been following the case particularly closely. I think you made up your mind years ago.

 

[Mickf]

Not just Irish. Every criminal justice system favours the wealthy.

I don't think you have any idea what happens in real life. I also don't think you have actually been following the case particularly closely. I think you made up your mind years ago.

Why don't u go back through my posts. There is a podcast called crime world that does a breakdown of each days court sessions. I posted on of their videos earlier in this thread.
Yeah i do have an idea what happens in real life. Thats why I don't have 87,000 posts on an internet forum you sad bastard.
Get off the internet and you might understand the real world.

 

[muaythaidon1]

I tend to try to look through the lens of, “What if everyone in society behaved this way….”

He’s a shitty shitty person. The world would explode if everyone behaved like Conor.

No doubt about that

 

[Can’t Handle My Riddum]

Thats why I don't have 87,000 posts on an internet forum you sad bastard.
Get off the internet and you might understand the real world.

And yet, here we all are, you included, arguing on the internet.

 

[Ares Black]

And yet, here we all are, you included, arguing on the internet.


View attachment 1071301

No way man! He's special and definitely knows what happens in the real world and he has a sharp legal mind.

 

[Ghostpepper]

Is anyone actually following the case or just reading headlines?

Conor got tore apart in cross examination today. He's guilty af. The only way he's getting out of this is if he pays off the jury

No he didn't.

 

[kellier]

Many many a trial reach a settlement, that is ALWAYS at play.

Conors lawyers will probably see how the trial plays out and if it looks like it isn't going their way, then the payment offer will come out and the NDAs.


If you believe the outcome is going to be a publicly released judges decision against Conor, prepare to be disappointed, that is extremely unlikely.

Conor is a cocky asshole who isn't used to being told no. (On many levels)

His attorneys can bill him at astronomical rates and cash out to great lengths during the trial, so if Conor wants to bet on his ego, fine with them, they get paid well for him to learn that lesson.

The end result will be a check and an NDA.

It's just a matter of if it will be a big check or a really big check.

There's no prospect of or even value in an NDA at trial. Its already in the public domain. The purpose of an NDA is to keep a settlement secret. Hence the Non Disclosure Agreement name. The defendant has incurred the reputational harm of the case reaching a public setting by trial stage.

In the event of a settlement agreed after a certain days evidence, the plaintiff barrister would literally need to walk into court the next morning and tell the judge at callover that the case isn't proceeding today because they reached a settlement... its a public forum with large media scrutiny so the settlement would be widely reported. So yep, no NDA.

The settlement sum would also come out in the wash, as its material to the level of professional fee the plaintiff legal team can claim an order for.

It wouldn't be a huge case. The potential damages aren't huge contextually. Aggravated sexual assault would be mean a serious PTSD claim, which €80-100k general damages. The bruising would have an uplift of max 10k. Maybe there's a loss of earnings claim too.

Costs aren't astronomical. Solicitors outline rates at the start of the case and give a cost budget (its a legal requirement). Prof fee for defence solicitor is max 50k on hourly rates. Insurers would have panel firms do it for 15k. Junior counsel maybe 7.5k, senior probably 20k. Personal injury isn't where the action is at for legal costs.

We'll leave it there so

 

[A Very Serious Cat]

When are people expecting a verdict?

 

[JayPettryMMA]

@JayPettryMMA any reason that Sherdog isn't covering the trial on the main page?

Conor McGregor Denies Sexual Assault Allegations in Civil Lawsuit

Conor McGregor denied that he sexually assaulted a woman in 2018 during testimony on Wednesday in a civil lawsuit filed against the UFC star, according to a report from the

www.sherdog.com

 

[Black0ut]

So he admits to having sex with her correct?

Dee, leave this goof and take half lol

 

[Mohawk Banditó]

Nobody is apologising for a rapist you fucking mug, its a discussion about an ongoing case.

Say alleged, not supposed.

 

[Hellowhosthat]

Conor McGregor Denies Sexual Assault Allegations in Civil Lawsuit

Conor McGregor denied that he sexually assaulted a woman in 2018 during testimony on Wednesday in a civil lawsuit filed against the UFC star, according to a report from the

www.sherdog.com

I'm pleased it's getting covered now. It wasn't at the time I tagged you.

 

[Rollio98]

No he didn't.

Must just be me so that thought he was made look like a lying pos today

 

[Dana's Moonface]

I gotta stay out of this thread. Too many piece of shit rape apologists.

Pond scum
We all have our silly debates regarding who we like, don't like etc, etc but rape apologists is fucking disgusting

 

[Hellowhosthat]

Yeah this civil case wouldn't be happening if it wasn't for his net worth. I can guarantee u she wouldn't be taking james lawrence to court.

She supposedly turned down a million hush money to try and take it to criminal trial

 

[Chaotic Progressor]

My understanding is that she never had an issue with Mr Lawrence. I think Mr Lawrence was told to say he had sex with her. That statement brought him into a picture and when Nikita was told of this statement she more or less said she was surprised because she doesn't recall having any issues with him. In court she denies having sex with Mr Lawrence and told the court she believes Mr Lawrence is lying about them having sex.

For some reason, ppl have it that she accused him of rape. Others can't wrap their heads around why she had sex with him etc I think too many ppl are reading headlines and not the details of that's being said in court, cross examinations etc

I also don't see why she would lie about this whereas i can see why he would lie. I think it's an attempt at trying to cover for Conor and paint her in a bad light. I also believe that Conor would have thrown this guy under the bus if it wasn't for the fact Conors DNA was found everywhere on her. Likewise Danielle likely has more to gain from supporting Conor than Nikita. I don't think she's a credible witness. She apparently denied sleeping with Mr Lawrence in her initial statements and later changed her statements and said "i didn't think it was relevant to the case"

Also, it hasn't been confirmed by gardai but Mcgregor refusing to hand over his phone is interesting. God knows what they would find in his phone. They also mentioned also that he gave a "prepared statement" and that he later changed it to add more details. Does this mean he was given time to think about what he wanted to say in relation to the charges?

But she's suing James also, for damages, for sexual assault.

If she believes he's lying and they didn't have sex, why is she suing him :/

 

[Chaotic Progressor]

Watch him in the run up to the Cowboy and first Poirier fight. He's good at faking sincerity.

...true.

 

[krelianx]

Who knows, maybe the boyfriend beat the shit out of her when he found out she chested.

You are beyond repair.

 

[krelianx]

I am just going to leave this here, since a few idiots here seem to be introducing doubt into something fairly straightforward:

We have the medical report by the doctor, by an expert on sexual assault, and by enforcement officer who saw her. This describes multiple injuries across her body as being severe, and even beyond what the experts had seen.

We have Conor's DNA. We have confirmed testimony of a tampon incrusted into her vagina that was surgically removed that indicates possible vaginal tear.

We have evidence of her clothes being torn.

We have records of her being traumatized, incapable of working, having panic attacks, for long after the incident.

We know she tried to pursue a criminal case, not civil. There are reports of her refusing a million payout.

We know of her house being broken into.

We have precedent of Conor being aggressive, and multiple accusations that overlap in significant ways to this, involving physical and sexual violence.

We don't have James' DNA in her.

We have footage of CCTV showing her with Lawrence oscillating back and forth in the hotel after Conor left, that's it.

So, what are we to conclude? That she beat herself up and faked trauma for years, fooling doctors of her mental distress? That Lawrence had sex with her but left no traces of it in her body, miraculously? That she pursued criminal charges and refused a buyout because that way she would later cash in more? That her boyfriend beat her up for being a bad girl and then she decided they could fake this as being caused by Conor? That despite people saying the injuries were abnormal, they were either self-inflicted or derived from elsewhere?