There is a reason the director of public prosecutions declined to pursue it in a criminal court. But im sure you are more of an expert on Irish law than them.I gotta stay out of this thread. Too many piece of shit rape apologists.
There is a reason the director of public prosecutions declined to pursue it in a criminal court. But im sure you are more of an expert on Irish law than them.I gotta stay out of this thread. Too many piece of shit rape apologists.
Yes. The prospects of convicting a rapist is low in general, especially a very wealthy rapist.There is a reason the director of public prosecutions declined to pursue it in a criminal court. But im sure you are more of an expert on Irish law than them.
If the other female and male involved aren’t lying for Conor, and are being sincere on their view of events and what they have perceived to have saw/heard. Then I have no idea what to think anymore; jury will struggle with this one.
They dpp said there was insufficient evidence to pursue a criminal prosecution or a reasonable prospect of a criminal conviction against either man.Yes. The prospects of convicting a rapist is low in general, especially a very wealthy rapist.
Yes. I wonder why?They dpp said there was insufficient evidence to pursue a criminal prosecution or a reasonable prospect of a criminal conviction against either man.
AbsolutelyThere is a very good reason there is a certain bar or level of evidence for a criminal conviction as courts very often have tried to be manipulated or weaponised by people.
YesThat bar is there to keep innocent people out of jail. On this occasion is it keeping a guilty man out if jail.
That's because you have poor judgement.Its definitely possible but I personally doubt it.
He can afford it. And it's a gamble.OR should i say two people out of jail. Remember james is only there because he "self incriminated" himself. How much money would Conor have to pay someone to go to prison for rape?
Yeah this civil case wouldn't be happening if it wasn't for his net worth. I can guarantee u she wouldn't be taking james lawrence to court.![]()
No he didn't.Is anyone actually following the case or just reading headlines?
Conor got tore apart in cross examination today. He's guilty af. The only way he's getting out of this is if he pays off the jury
Yeah, because it would have proceeded as a criminal case.Yeah this civil case wouldn't be happening if it wasn't for his net worth. I can guarantee u she wouldn't be taking james lawrence to court.
He can afford it. And it's
Where are u from?Yeah, because it would have proceeded as a criminal case.
It literally says in my profile.Where are u from?
She don't need too. That clown took himself to courtYeah this civil case wouldn't be happening if it wasn't for his net worth. I can guarantee u she wouldn't be taking james lawrence to court.
Unfortunately that's not an option. He will just be less rich.Has he been sentenced to life behind bars yet?!
This guy has no interest in actually understanding what happened.She don't need too. That clown took himself to court
Dunno what court case you were following soNo he didn't.