Like clockwork, the second someone loses, they're not that good. The second their top wins start to lose, their wins were never any good. It's so easy to pick apart wins outside of context, shit on records, opposition and do anything you can to break down a man's resume to make sense of why he lost a fight you thought he should have won.
You can do this with everyone after the fact. Maybe it's just a ridiculously difficult sport to maintain dominance in and the amount of disciplines makes it even more cumbersome. When someone is 20-0 and fights the top guys, they're going to eventually lose. MMA isn't based off of one discipline. Smarten up.
You could add Vettori to that list before he beat Jack. Again, context matters. This thread sucks.