• Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it.

Law Joe Rogan attempts to distance himself from the Republican party- Calls the Trump Inauguration Bizarre!

imagine thinking that centrists or moderates don't exist, if that doesn't show you that you are biased or brainwashed your done. One extreme or the other extreme being the only positions that exist in your mind is extremely dangerous.
 
Guests of differing thoughts. He had dem candidates on long before any republican. Tulsi and Sanders (endorsed). He's anti religion, pro gay, pro recreational drug use, universal healthcare and income. For us on the right... the only things he aligns is pro gun and hunting..just because he has peeps on different than him doesn't mean hes all of a sudden right wing.


Post 2020 he has not. Any long time listener has seen the change. He has drifted to the right on most things and you can see it
 
Post 2020 he has not. Any long time listener has seen the change. He has drifted to the right on most things and you can see it
What items specifically?
 
imagine thinking that centrists or moderates don't exist, if that doesn't show you that you are biased or brainwashed your done. One extreme or the other extreme being the only positions that exist in your mind is extremely dangerous.
This is actually a phenomenon I have been encountering lately. Fascinating how the group think / hivemind mentality has spread so far and run so deep.

The scary part is the lack of self reflection as there is a noticeable, palpable rage over "the others" being in a cult, when they themselves are making odd cultish determinations for individuals that identify within their group
 


594ae9b4-4307-4e2d-bac7-d8c8efaddf35_text.gif
 
I totally agree with what he said in the video about how people should never attach themselves to a party and that its more normal to be moderate than it is to superficially align yourself with just one side and pick a team..

but he is kinda naïve if he thinks his recent words and actions didn't make it look like he was in full support of the Republican party.

Kind of gaslighting listeners here lol

"Me? A republican? Of course not.. yeah I had him on my podcast and went to the inauguration.. but its YOU who is crazy to think that!"
 
{<hhh]

Decriminalizing sex work is. In the case that a sex worker is raped or assaulted, they aren't scared to report the abuse....But participating in the exchange is certainly misogynstic. You are literally paying woman in a vulnerable position to fuck you...Have you heard of the predatory male feminist arc type? That literally represents Hasan.


He isn't just "participating" in capitalism. He makes more than enough money without merch. He doesn't need to profit off other people's labor to live like a king.

And yeah, he is very much Pro-Hamas and CCP.
I agree that Hassan is a douche, but let me get this straight, you male feminists support women’s rights to do what they want with their bodies including selling their pussy, yet you’re against them ever having any clients?
 
That's such a shame to see you feel that way Mandy, you are always so pleasant and cordial with everyone here.
He and I are cool tho. He's a good dude that's a liberal pinko commie. What ya gonna do? Nobody's perfect
 
This is actually a phenomenon I have been encountering lately. Fascinating how the group think / hivemind mentality has spread so far and run so deep.

The scary part is the lack of self reflection as there is a noticeable, palpable rage over "the others" being in a cult, when they themselves are making odd cultish determinations for individuals that identify within their group
It's become so polarized that even to think about voting against the party is blasphemy. In reality the independent voters are a crucial part of having the pendulum swinging back and forth. Alienating this group will ensure they will vote the other way imo.
 
He had John Fetterman on this fall.
That's true. Because he's opened up as more of a centrist democrat who is reasonable about various things. I am curious about the dems on here and their feelings about Fetterman at this point.
 
That's true. Because he's opened up as more of a centrist democrat who is reasonable about various things. I am curious about the dems on here and their feelings about Fetterman at this point.
I lived in PA when he was elected and voted for him. The other choice was Dr. fucking Oz. He’s clearly a Democrat and not the “woke” kind.
 
He and I are cool tho. He's a good dude that's a liberal pinko commie. What ya gonna do? Nobody's perfect
I do think he's deep down a good soul (the pinko crap notwithstanding)

I personally am rooting for him to succeed as WR Pres, he may not think I do but I do
 
I do think he's deep down a good soul (the pinko crap notwithstanding)

I personally am rooting for him to succeed as WR Pres, he may not think I do but I do
He takes the internet way too seriously. Also thinks I’m running two accounts and now ducking me when I asked if he wanted to do a bet on it.
 
He takes the internet way too seriously. Also thinks I’m running two accounts and now ducking me when I asked if he wanted to do a bet on it.
He's flawed no doubt, but aren't we all, who am I to judge. The more antagonistic he gets, the more I want to reply with something positive. Holding that much in has to be rough
 
I totally agree with what he said in the video about how people should never attach themselves to a party and that its more normal to be moderate than it is to superficially align yourself with just one side and pick a team..

but he is kinda naïve if he thinks his recent words and actions didn't make it look like he was in full support of the Republican party.

Kind of gaslighting listeners here lol

"Me? A republican? Of course not.. yeah I had him on my podcast and went to the inauguration.. but its YOU who is crazy to think that!"

it's definitely optically contradictory but as you say, or as he says, never attach yourselves to one party - there will be plenty of times throughout our lives where we might agree with the left or the right and be vocal about our support. right now, he's vocal about his support of some right leaning issues but there are PLENTY of instances in the past 15 years where his support for left leaning issues was just as vocal.
 
it's definitely optically contradictory but as you say, or as he says, never attach yourselves to one party - there will be plenty of times throughout our lives where we might agree with the left or the right and be vocal about our support. right now, he's vocal about his support of some right leaning issues but there are PLENTY of instances in the past 15 years where his support for left leaning issues was just as vocal.

I agree with what he said in the video, but I don't think it aligns with his actions in this past election. Part of that is the democrats fault though for not even wanting to work with him. I don't know if he'd actually have Kamala/Walz on like he did for Trump/Vance, but in his defense it sounded like only 1 side even really tried to make it happen.. but I'd also argue that the optics are bad to only have one side on, have their allies on repeatedly (Elon), endorse one (Trump), and then celebrate at their inauguration.

But yes I do remember in the past him supporting other sides like Bernie Sanders for example. I was really only talking about this specific election cycle.
 
I agree with what he said in the video, but I don't think it aligns with his actions in this past election. Part of that is the democrats fault though for not even wanting to work with him. I don't know if he'd actually have Kamala/Walz on like he did for Trump/Vance, but in his defense it sounded like only 1 side even really tried to make it happen.. but I'd also argue that the optics are bad to only have one side on, have their allies on repeatedly (Elon), endorse one (Trump), and then celebrate at their inauguration.

But yes I do remember in the past him supporting other sides like Bernie Sanders for example. I was really only talking about this specific election cycle.

I've listened to his podcast quite a bit in the past few months, Fettermans, Trumps, Gibsonm, Theo etc. and according to what he said, he claims Kamala was only willing to do 45 minutes, quite a few topics off the table and he had to travel to them. I don't know if that's true, I don't see why he would go on record for something that could be easily disputed by Kamala, and as far as I know, hasn't been yet, but after listening to him, I do believe he was willing to have both on but without any constraints and of course, they come to him, which Trump eventually did. I kind of get the feeling Trump was let in on Kamala's reservations about Rogans format and agreed to do the interview before her. Optically, very poor for Kamala regardless if it was an opportunistic thing for Trump or not. In the end, Trump came on, Kamala didn't and it appears that they both had open invites.
 
Back
Top