Crime Jeffrey Epstein Dead

[KnightTemplar]

So we can unseal all the documents now, right?

The victims are suing to get them out, so why not release them?

So we can release the details of the plea deal now, right?

What's the point of keeping it sealed of the victims themselves want it public?

What documents?

 

[Fight To Win]

It would be easier for a sitting President to order the hit.

Wasn't Bill confirmed to be on the plane whereas Trump has not been? I could be wrong. But yeah Bill definitely has motive. And we know Hillary isn't shy about cutting loose ends either.

 

[JonesBones]

Your source doesn't exist, so i can't check it. Please make sure all references are accessible before posting please.

You see those orangish/reddish numbers? They are citations. lol. Your argument just blew up in your face. lol. You haven't provided a single source for your claims. You claimed to know where the anthrax came from. Where did you get this information? The FBI. So you are buying the FBI story over the scientists?

 

[Fergelmince]

And Bush couldn't even plant WMD in Iraq yet pulled off 911.

"The most widely used definition of "weapons of mass destruction" is that of nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weapon_of_mass_destruction#Definitions_of_the_term

 

[AndroidRage]

Wasn't Bill confirmed to be on the plane whereas Trump has not been? I could be wrong. But yeah Bill definitely has motive. And we know Hillary isn't shy about cutting loose ends either.

Trump had just been confirmed to have been on the plane. Just as this shit went down. Strange coincidence? Or was it the Trump crime family cutting loose ends?

 

[FierceRedBelt]

Banging a secretary seems casual for a guy fucking kids on a private island. I guess they did not care about Monica

It's like getting caught for stealing a candy bar when you're a murderer.

 

[OverCoronavirus Pressure]

I don't even get what your point is then.

So are you saying that Epstein's death was fishy or not?

What I've said is very simple but I'll reiterate.
1. CT conclusions are never the most likely explanation for a given event.
2. A lack of data is not in itself data. This isn't fully reported and the facts aren't fully known, therefore
3. Many are leaping to wild speculation fueled by speculation, dipped in suspicion.
4. The most likely explanation is human error and suicide.

Fishy circumstances? Yes.
Therefore, CT? No.

 

[HockeyBjj]

Tinfoil hat- on a Friday night as well when the nation and news are all still talking the mass shootings we had

 

[The Merchant]

You see those orangish/reddish numbers? They are citations. lol. Your argument just blew up in your face. lol. You haven't provided a single source for your claims. You claimed to know where the anthrax came from. Where did you get this information? The FBI. So you are buying the FBI story over the scientists?

I know click them and see what happens. Man you're slow.

In the process of checking your sources you seem to have misread the report. They're not denying it was AMES strain they're denying.

The report challenged the FBI and U.S. Justice Department’s conclusion that a single-spore batch of anthrax maintained by Ivins at his laboratory at Fort Detrick in Maryland was the parent material for the spores in the letters.

I.e. that Ivins sent the anthrax from one parent material, in other words the person acting alone theory they don't believe, which actually strengthens the CT angle.

As i say a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing, google scholars are a pain to deal with, so i'm going to leave you to grasp at straws.

 

[Jack V Savage]

Fake news NBC trying to say he wasn't on suicide watch

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...zDlLlzl_-6M1mS9pcStXsaFbx6ubvfJZvIHlwlOnlfyGI

From your link:

In July, two sources told NBC News that Epstein was on suicide watch.

Not at the time he did it, though.

 

[Fight To Win]

Trump had just been confirmed to have been on the plane. Just as this shit went down. Strange coincidence? Or was it the Trump crime family cutting loose ends?

I had not heard about that specifically but I remember just hours before he apparently "killed himself," there was some hubbub over Eppstein so I could see where that might have been him revealing Trump was on the plane. I didnt look into it at the time but I need to.

 

[The Merchant]

You see those orangish/reddish numbers? They are citations. lol. Your argument just blew up in your face. lol. You haven't provided a single source for your claims. You claimed to know where the anthrax came from. Where did you get this information? The FBI. So you are buying the FBI story over the scientists?

If you had brains you'd be dangerous is common saying over here.

is PBS good enough source.

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/paul-keim-we-were-surprised-it-was-the-ames-strain/

Your mistaking scientists not believing one guy could create the strains from one culture with nobody knowing what strain it is.

New scientist good enough?

Anthrax bacteria likely to be US military strain

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/articl...ikely-to-be-us-military-strain/#ixzz5wDLQNWXA

 

[ToxicShocker]

Fake news NBC trying to say he wasn't on suicide watch

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...zDlLlzl_-6M1mS9pcStXsaFbx6ubvfJZvIHlwlOnlfyGI

New York Post said the same thing, "He had been on watch two weeks ago"

 

[JonesBones]

I know click them and see what happens. Man you're slow.

In the process of checking your sources you seem to have misread the report. They're not denying it was AMES strain they're denying.

The report challenged the FBI and U.S. Justice Department’s conclusion that a single-spore batch of anthrax maintained by Ivins at his laboratory at Fort Detrick in Maryland was the parent material for the spores in the letters.

I.e. that Ivins sent the anthrax from one parent material, in other words the person acting alone theory they don't believe, which actually strengthens the CT angle.

As i say a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing, google scholars are a pain to deal with, so i'm going to leave you to grasp at straws.

Why does the NAS disagree with the DOJ?

 

[COHAB]

Interesting how some want to characterise the people discussing the information as opposed to the information itself.

A logical fallacy in debate.

Calm down...it's just a meme

Everyone who has more than 2 neurons knows this suicide is really suspicious.

 

[The Merchant]

Why does the NAS disagree with the DOJ?

in general or do you have a specific point? It's going to be funny when you suddenly realise the mistake you're making, i'm literally running a clock on how long it takes you to figure it out.

 

[COHAB]

Ok I might be a conspiracy guy now. A guy under suicide watch still ending up committing "suicide". This shit stinks to high heaven.

 

[Hard To Tell]

Trump had just been confirmed to have been on the plane. Just as this shit went down. Strange coincidence? Or was it the Trump crime family cutting loose ends?

Nah, Trump once flew on one of Epstein's planes but never the 'Lolita Express' like Clinton did, multiple times. Trump, as far as we know, also never visited Epstein's private island, which is the biggest incriminating peice of evidence in all of this. Whereas again, Clinton did, multiple times.

 

[JonesBones]

in general or do you have a specific point? It's going to be funny when you suddenly realise the mistake you're making, i'm literally running a clock on how long it takes you to figure it out.

I asked a question. Why does the NAS disagree with the DOJ?

 

[AndroidRage]

It's like getting caught for stealing a candy bar when you're a murder.

Or like getting caught paying pornstars for sex when you have a rape charge against you that alleged you raped a 13 year old girl with Epstein at one of his parties .......