Crime Jeffrey Epstein Dead

How do ya think Epstein died?


  • Total voters
    586
Similar to the dude from that TV show Glee except the guy was young, handsome, and into child porn. But the second he was convicted, it was suicide by hanging.
 
depositphotos_178029602-stock-video-friends-in-foil-on-the.jpg
 
Ok, no jokes.

People should seriously talk about how this guy was murdered in prison.

He was on suicide watch already.

He literally couldn't have committed suicide.

I 100% agree with you. He was either murdered, or he was swapped out and isn't really dead.

Im not a conspiracy theorist. Hes was in a federal prison under suicide watch which includes 24 hour video surveillance. Its simply not possible.
 
Why couldn't Dick Cheney plant nuclear weapons in Iraq? Are you seriously asking me that?

He didn't have to plant nukes. Just some anthrax or small amounts of wmd. One meth truck basically was all they needed to plant. It should be an easy job compared to 911.

latest
 
Ok I might be a conspiracy guy now. A guy under suicide watch still ending up committing "suicide". This shit stinks to high heaven.
 
He didn't have to plant nukes. Just some anthrax or small amounts of wmd. One meth truck basically was all they needed to plant. It should be an easy job compared to 911.

latest

You do realise Anthrax has a unique signature to the lab that developed it. It's why the Anthrax posted to Congress after 9/11 was found to be of the AMES strain produced out of Fort Dettrick and not sent by mohammed Atta and given to Iraqi's as supposedly witnessed by Israeli intelligence in Prague (meeting never happened)

A little knowledge is dangerous as they say.

You've read a bit bit nowhere near enough.

"In October 2001, Northern Arizona University microbiologist Dr. Paul Keim identified that the anthrax used in the attack letters was the Ames strain, a development he described as “chilling” because that particular strain was developed in U.S. government laboratories."
 
You do realise Anthrax has a unique signature to the lab that developed it. It's why the Anthrax posted to Congress after 9/11 was found to be of the AMES strain produced out of Fort Dettrick and not sent by mohammed Atta and given to Iraqi's as supposedly witnessed by Israeli intelligence in Prague (meeting never happened)

A little knowledge is dangerous as they say.

You've read a bit bit nowhere near enough.

Why couldn't they have forged shit like they did on 911? The anthrax case is still basically unresolved too. Cheney could have set that up. You believe everything the government tells you?
 
I just came for the conspiracy theories.
The guy who killed seth rich was hired as a prison guard when this case first came to light, look into guards hired around that time. I wouldn't be surprised if he previously worked at a well known pizza parlor
 
The FBI has launched an investigation into Epstein's death. Not in itself suspicious, given it's the death of a high profile inmate in Federal custody.
 
Listen if you want tutored we need to agree a rate.

I know of no "forged shit" on 9/11.


The NAS committee released its report on February 15, 2011, concluding that it was "impossible to reach any definitive conclusion about the origins of the anthrax in the letters, based solely on the available scientific evidence".[167] The report also challenged the FBI and U.S. Justice Department's conclusion that a single-spore batch of anthrax maintained by Ivins at his laboratory at Fort Detrick in Maryland was the parent material for the spores in the anthrax letters.[166][168][169]

So, there goes your story. The NAS can't find its origins, but you can?

Things didn't need to be forged to pull off 911? lol
 
So we can unseal all the documents now, right?

The victims are suing to get them out, so why not release them?

So we can release the details of the plea deal now, right?

What's the point of keeping it sealed of the victims themselves want it public?
 
The NAS committee released its report on February 15, 2011, concluding that it was "impossible to reach any definitive conclusion about the origins of the anthrax in the letters, based solely on the available scientific evidence".[167] The report also challenged the FBI and U.S. Justice Department's conclusion that a single-spore batch of anthrax maintained by Ivins at his laboratory at Fort Detrick in Maryland was the parent material for the spores in the anthrax letters.[166][168][169]

So, there goes your story. The NAS can't find its origins, but you can?

Things didn't need to be forged to pull off 911? lol

Your source doesn't exist, so i can't check it. Please make sure all references are accessible before posting please.

In the process of checking your sources you seem to have misread the report. They're not denying it was AMES strain they're denying.

The report challenged the FBI and U.S. Justice Department’s conclusion that a single-spore batch of anthrax maintained by Ivins at his laboratory at Fort Detrick in Maryland was the parent material for the spores in the letters.

I.e. that Ivins sent the anthrax from one parent material, in other words the person acting alone theory they don't believe, which actually strengthens the CT angle.

As i say a little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing, google scholars are a pain to deal with, so i'm going to leave you to grasp at straws.
 
The NAS committee released its report on February 15, 2011, concluding that it was "impossible to reach any definitive conclusion about the origins of the anthrax in the letters, based solely on the available scientific evidence".[167] The report also challenged the FBI and U.S. Justice Department's conclusion that a single-spore batch of anthrax maintained by Ivins at his laboratory at Fort Detrick in Maryland was the parent material for the spores in the anthrax letters.[166][168][169]

So, there goes your story. The NAS can't find its origins, but you can?

Things didn't need to be forged to pull off 911? lol
That didn't stop the fbi from trying to pin it on multiple people, giving them essentially death sentences.
 
Back
Top